What's diskwriter's "use replaygain" actually do?, I accidentally had it on ... |
![]() ![]() |
What's diskwriter's "use replaygain" actually do?, I accidentally had it on ... |
Mar 23 2005, 23:31
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 26-July 02 Member No.: 2804 |
I had foo_discwriter's "use replaygain" on accidentally while encoding a few CD rips lossless (to flac). By the time I noticed it I already had deleted the .wavs of the first few albums. I was able to do a bit compare for the last album though, and the .wav and .flac came out identical.
That'd mean it did not modify the input data, but it didn't add gain tags to the .flacs either. Does anyone know for sure what this option does? Should I rerip just to be sure? C. |
|
|
|
Mar 23 2005, 23:45
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1428 Joined: 10-April 03 Member No.: 5916 |
QUOTE (Fallen Guru @ Mar 24 2005, 12:31 AM) I had foo_discwriter's "use replaygain" on accidentally while encoding a few CD rips lossless (to flac). By the time I noticed it I already had deleted the .wavs of the first few albums. I was able to do a bit compare for the last album though, and the .wav and .flac came out identical. That'd mean it did not modify the input data, but it didn't add gain tags to the .flacs either. Does anyone know for sure what this option does? Should I rerip just to be sure? C. The discwrite will only use replaygain when converting those files that already have replaygain info added to them. If the files don't have replaygain info added it won't use replaygain of course. Basically it works the same way as the replaygain settings for playback. |
|
|
|
Mar 24 2005, 01:00
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 26-July 02 Member No.: 2804 |
Thanks! I thought it might have done a RG scan alongside the encoding.
|
|
|
|
Mar 24 2005, 05:14
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 31 Joined: 22-March 05 Member No.: 20818 |
So to be clear, checking RG in diskwriter only transfers the RG Metadata? Is that correct? I wasn't sure if it possibly wrote the new file(s) at the RG levels.
Cheers, Pete |
|
|
|
Mar 24 2005, 09:31
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 225 Joined: 10-April 03 From: Tampere, Finland Member No.: 5911 |
No, the new files will be written at the RG levels... As in, if you run the replaygain on them it comes out as 0dB.
-------------------- Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe
|
|
|
|
Mar 30 2005, 08:36
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 19-March 05 Member No.: 20746 |
On a related subject... may I beg somebody knowledgeable on this to have a look here: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=31006
Any help would be greatly appreciated. |
|
|
|
Apr 2 2005, 10:17
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 31 Joined: 22-March 05 Member No.: 20818 |
For additional clarification:
My main goal is to transcode lossless files to a lossy format for play on an iPod. Of course I use foo_pod extensively. Foo-pod usage aside, here are my questions: Question1) Will there be any difference, quality or otherwise when using these different processing schemes?(Lossless files have already been RG) SchemeA) Step1. Transcoding from lossless to AAC/MP3 using Diskwriter. Step2. Running AACGain/MP3Gain on the AAC/MP3 SchemeB) Step1. Transcoding from lossless to AAC/MP3 using Diskwriter with RG SchemeC) Step1. Trancoding from lossless to AAC/MP3 using Diskwriter. Step2. Running Replaygain on the AAC/MP3 files. Now I realize that SchemeC is inherently different than A and B. It is my understanding that in C only metadata is affected and the player must support RG to adjust the volume. The problem I think with C is that if I scan the AAC/MP3 file with AACGain/MP3Gain the files frequently show clipping. Which leads me to the second question. Question2) If the AAC/MP3 are clipped and I RG them and play them in Foobar, is the clipping played back or not?(I am specifically referring to clipping that would have been eliminated by running AACGain/MP3Gain on the lossy files. I hope my questions are intelligible. Thank you in advance for your replies. Cheers, Pete This post has been edited by Yamabushi: Apr 2 2005, 10:18 |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd November 2009 - 03:52 |