Output Component Support in 0.9.1 SDK ? |
  |
Output Component Support in 0.9.1 SDK ? |
| Guest_nRaecheR_* |
  Apr 23 2006, 21:43
Post
#1
|
|
Guests  |
Hi,
I still cannot find the output component support in the new 0.9.1 SDK or the sources for the new "official" ASIO component. It seems that the developers of foobar2000 don't want that other developers are creating output components for fb2k.... Do I miss something ?  nRaecheR |
 |
 
|
|
Apr 23 2006, 22:00
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 576 Joined: 4-January 03 From: Scotland Member No.: 4415 |
QUOTE (nRaecheR @ Apr 23 2006, 09:43 PM)  It seems that the developers of foobar2000 don't want that other developers are creating output components for fb2k.... It certainly looks that way, but nothong official has been said. Last I heard was that the output SDK hadn't been completely finalised. BUT - I am satisfied with the output plugin we have right now. What did you have in mind? -------------------- http://www.animarecordings.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 23 2006, 23:37
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Super Moderator Posts: 2741 Joined: 26-July 02 Member No.: 2796 |
I second what Funkstar said. Too many uninformed users were using things like ASIO and Kernel Streaming just because they're more technical/esoteric, not because they're in any way superior (they're not, especially for an audio player, where latency is a negligible issue).
This post has been edited by Canar: Apr 23 2006, 23:38 -------------------- an aliencat ate my dog
|
|
|
|
 Apr 24 2006, 21:26
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 2 Joined: 24-April 06 Member No.: 29981 |
It's me again, nRaecheR, it seems that my original account has been closed/disabled/etc. after I wrote the prevoius forum post, now I always get a message that I haven't got permission to access the forums
 ....and the "contact the forum moderator" email address is invalid (mailer@)....so I created a second account....  QUOTE (Funkstar De Luxe @ Apr 23 2006, 10:00 PM) BUT - I am satisfied with the output plugin we have right now. What did you have in mind? I'm the author of the OpenAL output component and I just want to port/update it to foobar2000 0.9.x...I'm not very happy with the missing support for 3rd party components of the new version of fb2k. In my opinion the extensibility of foobar2000 was one of the best features of it, for my part I will stick with 0.8.3 as long as there is no real support for 3rd components and I believe others will do the same or they will switch to other players... |
|
|
|
|
Apr 24 2006, 23:24
Post
#5
|
|
 Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 1203 Joined: 10-February 02 From: Endless Water Member No.: 1305 |
Nonsense.
1) generally, 3rd party components are obviously supported, please be more accurate. 2) as has been said before, 3rd party output components will likely be supported in the future, however at the moment the output api is not finalized. No FUD please. -------------------- A riddle is a short sword attached to the next 2000 years.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 25 2006, 06:29
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 2 Joined: 24-April 06 Member No.: 29981 |
QUOTE (ssamadhi97 @ Apr 24 2006, 11:24 PM) 2) as has been said before, 3rd party output components will likely be supported in the future, however at the moment the output api is not finalized. But when will the output API be finalized ? Why are there a couple of components (KS, DS, ASIO) when the API is not "final" ? When is a API "final" ? The API seems final enough to release two non-beta versions of fb2k....okay, we have to wait but some kind of roadmap would be very nice.... |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th September 2010 - 08:09 |
