<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Hydrogenaudio Posts</title>
	<description>Latest posts from Hydrogenaudio</description>
	<link>http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php</link>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:39:58 +0100</pubDate>
	<ttl>5</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>DSP Filter design software?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=76328&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description>How about a good old stream of ints in C++ or Java. Is there anything to wish for?</description>
		<author>rpp3po</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:18:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">7dc8ed2b555cf76c939155b4096f78fa20cda9b6</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Players not reading metadata from WAV ripping.</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=76334&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=668795:date=Nov 20 2009, 13&#58;23:name=Mind4Music)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Mind4Music &#064; Nov 20 2009, 13&#58;23) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=668795"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I'm now going to re-record everything across in FLAC.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br />Removing the existing tags in Media Monkey and then converting the wav files for example with foobar2000 may be faster.<br /><br />Also you might consider to use <a href="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showforum=68" target="_blank">WavPack</a> which is my favorite lossless format.]]></description>
		<author>Robertina</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:17:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">46adc4914ace3fd7baacbf577c6b26449010c803</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Just had my ears cleaned</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=76262&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description></description>
		<author>Axon</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:27:48 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">0c9e00debb4404c0eabfcad0c2a1b366df7fbc77</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Cover art not displayed in iTunes</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=76341&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,<br /><br />I use iTunes 9.x. I have a problem to read correctly the cover art.<br />The cover art is correctly decoded with the file explorer, Windows Media Player and foobar2000 but not iTunes. I don't know why...<br /><br />When I display the file properties : iTunes detects an image but displays a white square.<br /><br />I upload a MP3 which generates the problem. You can download it at:<br /><a href="http://www.luminescence-software.org/download/cover_art_itunes.mp3" target="_blank">http://www.luminescence-software.org/downl..._art_itunes.mp3</a><br /><br />What is wrong? My MP3? iTunes?<br /><br />Thanks for your help.]]></description>
		<author>Cyber Sinh</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:15:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">18acb21ec0af2381891b891b6ede86f3f005f9c8</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>TagScanner 5.1</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=74450&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[any chance to add TagScanner to the context menu? (like "scan this folder with tagscanner")<br />I liked that about Tag&Rename (which I abandoned now :&gt;)]]></description>
		<author>Firehawk</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:51:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=74450</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Why are SOME songs not for sale digitally?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=76309&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description>You can buy Toys in the Attic on Amazon in mp3 but there all marked as album only so you have to buy the full album to get the songs.</description>
		<author>A_Day_Without_Me</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:13:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">12520627a160c066f40a79638aa08fd46e971df4</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Recording Problem</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=76331&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the reply mate and the heads up on the correct terminology! I think you've got the gist of my set-up, everything you said made perfect sense, I have tried the balance and the mixer and other audio options offered by the sound card and everything seems to be correct.<br /><br />Yeah so the problem is not like something loose inside the actual line-in connection but rather the ext. sound card. perhaps something went wrong with the installation or my computer cannot fully support it somehow. My sister seemed to think that wasn't the problem but that was before I had experimented fully with all possibilities, maybe her opinion would be different now. I seen a similar problem from a member here and they solved it by re-installing the sound card or something and using a different PCI slot, now I don't know what a PCI slot is but my computer only has one says my sister, it's a 'Shuttle' and not a fully featured PC, no CD drive and other limitations which is why I had to go down the route of external sound card rather than a soundchip which is exactly what I had before and it was so easy to use and of course took up no extra space and USB slots.<br /><br />So yeah I'll give my sis the extra info I've gotten through experimenting and yourself and see what I can do, she works with a computer company and it's no problem to get a new sound card to try out, I didn't even pay for this one I have now so it's not as if I'm losing out on anything. Looks like I'll have to get a better, more powerful ext. sound card.<br /><br />I've just this minute tried my Creative Zen connected to the line-in and it works perfectly, sound from both speakers, which now rules out it being a problem with the line-in connection so I think it's officially the sound card.<br /><br />Thanks for the help Doug! <img src="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />]]></description>
		<author>Logy</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:26:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">2ccd049c35999580940d787d1c6794d02d37b60f</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>lossyWAV 1.2.0 Development Thread</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=65499&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description>I meant that the revised --altpreset setting at --standard is more onerous than the existing setting at --portable. (revised above).</description>
		<author>Nick.C</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:32:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">923c09e5256e875ba42d7f6b027fabbb6e0f8f34</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>A multicore MP3 encoder</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=73790&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=668274:date=Nov 18 2009, 19&#58;01:name=GeorgeFP)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GeorgeFP &#064; Nov 18 2009, 19&#58;01) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=668274"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Bad news: The Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition does not accept the solution file that was created by the Professional Edition <img src="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/sad.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":(" border="0" alt="sad.gif" /><br /><br />But it's possible to download a trial version of the Professional Edition. I will try it the next days.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br />Thanks for keeping us updated! Even bad news is news, and that you've already found an alternative is great to hear too!<br /><br />I hope the trial isn't as restricted as the Express Edition, as in "dear god I hope it will compile on that"   <img src="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" /><br /><br />Good luck!]]></description>
		<author>smeargol</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:58:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">f01a2b7434a2a97be8b4fc525b015904226fe88f</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Does Koss make good headphones?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=76314&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I've never listend to the Porta Pro, but as far as sound quality, it has reputation of being a bargain.   I'm guessing that it compares favorably with headphones going for $100 - $150.<br /><br />Koss has been around for a long time.  The Porta Pro has been around for 25 years!  They must be doing something right if a 25-year old design is still cosidered one of the best in it's price range.  And, it has a lifetime warranty!<br /><br />Not all Koss headphones have the same reputation for sound quality.  Some probably have "average" sound quality in their respective price range.    I doubt that "All Koss products suck" unless you are comparing them to $500 headphones.   I used to see Koss Pro 4AA* headphones used a lot in radio/tv stations. (I havent been in a radio or TV station for many years.)   <br /><br />In a given price range, open headphones will generally have better sound than closed phones.    <i>All</i> of the Grado models (all open back) have a reputation similar to the Porta Pro of being one of the best sounding in every price range.  But, as someone noted in your other thread, they <i>look</i> kind-of cheap.  I have a pair of Grado SR225's, and they don't <i>look</i> like I paid $200 for them, but they sound nice!<br /><br /><br />* They keep adding A's...  First, it was the Pro 4A, then the Pro 4AA, and now it's the Pro 4AAAT. <img src="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="biggrin.gif" />]]></description>
		<author>DVDdoug</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:43:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">befa4ba0dcc56533662508ebafe3f4e8b07565b5</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Another Subjective Audio Test</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=76264&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=668280:date=Nov 18 2009, 12&#58;36:name=2Bdecided)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (2Bdecided &#064; Nov 18 2009, 12&#58;36) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=668280"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=668272:date=Nov 18 2009, 16&#58;29:name=Arnold B. Krueger)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arnold B. Krueger &#064; Nov 18 2009, 16&#58;29) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=668272"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->For the longest time the widest dynamic range commercial recording that I was aware of turned out to be pop, but recently the tide turned and the widest dynamic range commercial recording that I am aware of is classical.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Go on then, I'll bite - what are they?<br /><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br />Pop - ricky Lee Jones first album<br /><br />Classical - any of the recent BIS recordings with the Minneapolis Orchestra, particularly Beethoven Symphonies]]></description>
		<author>Arnold B. Krueger</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:15:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">21bbc8f65781c8b7ebfe9f7b6ab2237778e87daf</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Spotify uses Ogg Vorbis (q5)</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=68547&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Disturbingly, one of the people at AVGuide (TAS's website) pointed this one out. Even more disturbingly, the piece seems to be remarkably factual and foo-free. Even the one response is quite sane. All of which explains why it got less views than anything else on the site.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.avguide.com/blog/spotify-the-freemium-future-music" target="_blank">Spotify - The Freemium Future of Music</a><br /><br />I mean, let's face it... the prospective future of audio is nowhere near as important as some photos of a guy unboxing a pair of crazy money loudspeakers.<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
		<author>Gag Halfrunt</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:07:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">047fb364c6599c1758b2eda993ef8b6b1ddc3752</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>why when i put a usb key with a movie in my Tv reader?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=76326&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi<br /><br /><br />i have a issue<br /><br /><br />everytime i put a movie on a usb stick , and plug on the tv or a decoder with usb , the movie become corrupted<br /><br />does somebody why?<br /><br />i used the hash to compare , and this happen only with the movie<br /><br />i mean i put in the usb key photos and music<br /><br />but the tv and the decoder did corrupt only the video<br /><br />thanks]]></description>
		<author>francesco</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:32:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">26d4764a4124bf8d9b8c7fc253a603c3a92cf12a</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>TAK 2.0 Development</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=74949&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=668560:date=Nov 20 2009, 09&#58;58:name=TBeck)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TBeck &#064; Nov 20 2009, 09&#58;58) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=668560"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Some bad news for some power hungry users: For now i have again reduced the maximum predictor count from 256 to 160.<br />  Thomas<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br />Not boring at all, about the max predictors, would a value like 192 be a reasonable compromise?<br />]]></description>
		<author>GeSomeone</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:37:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">857b2dba4802fa2516e4b17c2ff05853b41ba70a</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Newbie with two questions about headphones?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=76289&view=getnewpost]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I would avoid skullcandy, not because of any grievances about sound quality (I really wouldn't know) but because you're going to be paying extra for a tacky picture of a skull on the earcups. Skull candy spends A LOT of money on advertising, and to get their headphones into HMV.]]></description>
		<author>Chef</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:37:44 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">fbee3bcc79cb5e788d515fe970faa3fb1ce468e8</guid>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>