lame 320K to V0? |
  |
lame 320K to V0? |
 Mar 3 2011, 07:35
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 3-March 11 Member No.: 88659  |
it is the first time 320k to V0 , how about the loss? it is obvious?
This post has been edited by aozora: Mar 3 2011, 07:36 |
 |
 
|
|
Mar 3 2011, 07:38
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 178 Joined: 25-May 10 Member No.: 80883 |
There will be some loss though you'll have to do some ABX tests to see if you hear any difference. My opinion not worth the effort for the small amount of space you will save.
This post has been edited by Billytheonion: Mar 3 2011, 07:42 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2011, 10:34
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 913 Joined: 22-October 01 From: the Netherlands Member No.: 335 |
QUOTE (aozora @ Mar 3 2011, 08:35)  320k to V0 , how about the loss? it is obvious? There will be some sort of "loss" in both cases. The difference between them however, will be very small when you try to ABX them (if you can at all). |
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2011, 12:24
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 3-March 11 Member No.: 88659 |
thanks！
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2011, 13:36
Post
#5
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 933 Joined: 3-June 02 From: USA Member No.: 2204 |
-------------------- Complexity of incoherent design.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2011, 10:41
Post
#6
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 118 Joined: 16-February 11 Member No.: 88210 |
Encoding lossy to lossy will surely degrade its quality. But about being obvious, everyone's has a difference in perception, so an ABX would be the most likely method to prove this to yourself
-------------------- sin(α) = v sound/v object = Mach No.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2011, 20:14
Post
#7
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 512 Joined: 18-January 04 From: bethlehem.pa.us Member No.: 11318 |
Many people generally agree (from a "purist" perspective) that going from one lossy encoding to another is A Bad Idea™. However, if you're looking to just squeeze out a small percentage of filesize (which is really all you'll get, going from 320kbps CBR to V0 VBR), MP3packer is your best bet and will have no further loss.
This post has been edited by Zarggg: Mar 4 2011, 20:14 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 5 2011, 18:15
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 118 Joined: 16-February 11 Member No.: 88210 |
QUOTE (Zarggg @ Mar 5 2011, 03:14) MP3packer is your best bet and will have no further loss. Yeah. maybe this is the only way to go. I've heard that it's lossless. So be it 
-------------------- sin(α) = v sound/v object = Mach No.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 5 2011, 18:48
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 85 Joined: 22-March 09 Member No.: 68252 |
Why not just convert from lossless to V0?Converting from lossy to lossy just distorts the already compressed and deleted samples even further than if you were to do from lossless.The file size will be smaller, but the quality would be even worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 18:30 |
