alternate (custom) settings to -normal (psytel 2.12) |
![]() ![]() |
alternate (custom) settings to -normal (psytel 2.12) |
Mar 1 2002, 13:00
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 11 Joined: 1-March 02 Member No.: 1424 |
i'm wondering which settings other people use for psytel aac (but i'd like to know ;-)
-br 160 -vbrhi -c 20000 -low_ath -ihsc is it good / bad / better or worse than -normal? files seem to be smaller than with normal setting but i don't need the higher cutoff rate. i don't have ears like a bat. i'm just a user and not an expert, so i don't want to play around with 'hidden switches' if i don't have to. currently i'm just looking for best setting which shouldn't go over 200 bitrate. between 150 and 200 would be nice. (-extreme is a bit too high for most of the songs). thanks for your comments. |
|
|
|
Mar 1 2002, 17:58
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 336 Joined: 27-December 01 From: Stockholm, Sweden Member No.: 780 |
I use "-vbrhi -ihsc -safems" which I (and some of my friends) find quite good... Produces bitrates between 150 to 180 kbit/s.. Though in some rare occations, it can produce bitrates as low as 80 kbit/s (short single channel encodings) and up to 215 kbit/s (only reached this high with a couple of techno/trance songs)...
I´ll do some thorough testing once I get hold of some better listening equipment... My current $20 Sony head phones are quite bad... They make 96kbit --alt-preset Lame encodings sound the same as the original CD:s... :/ Hehe... But I´m not an expert either... I just use what seems to be good... |
|
|
|
Mar 5 2002, 20:41
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 11 Joined: 1-March 02 Member No.: 1424 |
thanks for your answer.
i remember ivan posted that the presets should provide the best results. however, i like to experiment with new settings. i'm now using -br 160 -vbrhi -ishc -low_ath -safe_ms. which bitrate are you using? (-br?) i think it has quite an influence (base bitrate). i hope other people will post their settings, too. would be quite interesting what other people believe sounds good. ps: does aacenc crash on some files on your system too? i had to restart encoding several times, but it happens only with some, and i don't think it depends on the settings (it's the same with -normal preset). dos window just quits with 'abnormal program' error (don't know what it is in english). |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2002, 22:46
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 336 Joined: 27-December 01 From: Stockholm, Sweden Member No.: 780 |
QUOTE Originally posted by Dark Shadow
1. I´m not using -br at all... I let -vbrhi decide the most suitable bitrate... Works just fine for me... thanks for your answer. i remember ivan posted that the presets should provide the best results. however, i like to experiment with new settings. i'm now using -br 160 -vbrhi -ishc -low_ath -safe_ms. which bitrate are you using? (-br?) i think it has quite an influence (base bitrate). i hope other people will post their settings, too. would be quite interesting what other people believe sounds good. ps: does aacenc crash on some files on your system too? i had to restart encoding several times, but it happens only with some, and i don't think it depends on the settings (it's the same with -normal preset). dos window just quits with 'abnormal program' error (don't know what it is in english). 2. No it doesn´t crash... Some older versions does but ever since the corrected version 2.12 was released, it has been dead stable... What OS and version of PsyTEL AACEnc are you using? |
|
|
|
Mar 10 2002, 22:08
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 11 Joined: 1-March 02 Member No.: 1424 |
ad 1) in readme.txt or somewhere else i found that standard bitrate is 128, so your standard bitrate is 128 i guess (i don't think -vbrhi does make any decision for standard bitrates).
ad 2) it could be that (maybe) the wav's are corrupt. i compressed them with a beta/alpha version of monkey's lossless encoder some time ago. i had some difficulties decompressing them. after some time thinking, i decided that -normal should still give the best results, but files get larger than with my custom -br 160 settings. i've also seen on this forum that ivan recommended not to use -safems without a profile. i'd like to know if this is still the case with the latest version (2.15). guess only ivan can answer this. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 07:43 |