IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages V  « < 6 7 8  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
foo_musicbrainz, MusicBrainz Tagger
noiselab
post Jul 29 2012, 20:24
Post #176





Group: Members
Posts: 18
Joined: 13-August 07
Member No.: 46162



When trying to retrieve tags by TOC, the track length in samples must be divisible by 588. Can support for files encoded at 48000hz (eg Opus files) be implemented for when retrieving tags by TOC?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Seeker
post Aug 21 2012, 14:18
Post #177





Group: Members
Posts: 96
Joined: 15-June 04
From: Buxton, UK
Member No.: 14694



Does foo_musicbrainz write ID3v2.4 tags? If so, can it be changed to write ID3v2.3?


--------------------
Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rarn
post Aug 28 2012, 08:21
Post #178





Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 26-July 11
Member No.: 92568



I believe this plugin is writing MusicBrainz IDs to the incorrect tags. At the very least it is writing them differently than Picard, and I believe Picard is the reference standard.


The full tag mappings are here:
http://musicbrainz.org/doc/MusicBrainz_Picard/Tags/Mapping

As you can see, Picard tags Album ID in ID3v2.3 in "TXXX:MusicBrainz Album Id"
However, foo_musicbrainz tags Album ID to MUSICBRAINZ_ALBUMID

this also occurs with Artist IDs (though not Track IDs strangely)


This can be tested easily by tagging an album in foobar first with foo_musicbrainz, and then tagging the album again in Picard (make sure to not have it delete all prior tags before writing). You'll have redundant tags, with both "MUSICBRAINZ ALBUM ID" and "MUSICBRAINZ_ALBUMID" populated with the same data.

I'm not sure which is correct, but I would lean toward Picard. Regardless they should be doing the same thing.

What should I do if I want to adhere to musicbrainz standards?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
marc2003
post Aug 28 2012, 14:30
Post #179





Group: Members
Posts: 3287
Joined: 27-January 05
From: England
Member No.: 19379



QUOTE (The Seeker @ Aug 21 2012, 14:18) *
Does foo_musicbrainz write ID3v2.4 tags? If so, can it be changed to write ID3v2.3?


i don't use this but i'm guessing it uses the foobar core to write tags. check the settings under file>preferences>advanced>tagging>mp3>id3v2 revision and quirks.

(these days foobar writes id3v2.3 by default but if you've continuously upgraded from older versions it may have remembered the old default of using 2.4)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
skrech
post Jan 12 2013, 15:33
Post #180





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 30-September 11
Member No.: 94074



Hey,
Does this plug-in do a fingerprint of the track? I think it should do, but I can't manage to find the option/button for this.
As it is written in the first post:
QUOTE
Fetches data by automatically calculated MusicBrainz Disc ID


The only musicbrainz related buttons are in RMB->Tagging->Get Tags From MusicBrainz (artist and album tags // musicbrainz album id). My understanding is that the music album id option should calculate the fingerprint and querry the server, but instead it just ask me to manually enter the ID. Is this the intended behaviour?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jesus2099
post Jan 12 2013, 20:01
Post #181





Group: Members
Posts: 97
Joined: 13-December 06
From: Paris
Member No.: 38657



Just insert your cd and it will find it in MB instead of using FreeDB or CDDB for instance.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
soulsearchingsun
post Feb 6 2013, 14:25
Post #182





Group: Members
Posts: 143
Joined: 27-January 05
Member No.: 19370



QUOTE (skrech @ Jan 12 2013, 15:33) *
Does this plug-in do a fingerprint of the track? I think it should do, but I can't manage to find the option/button for this.
No, it doesn't. If you want full musicbrainz features, use Picard or any of the provided third party alternatives (see mb homepage).

QUOTE (skrech @ Jan 12 2013, 15:33) *
QUOTE
Fetches data by automatically calculated MusicBrainz Disc ID
Yes, but only for lossless sources. You can't derive disc ID's from sources that don't preserve the 588 sample sector layout of Redbook-CDs, as do most (all?) lossy codecs.

QUOTE (skrech @ Jan 12 2013, 15:33) *
My understanding is that the music album id option should calculate the fingerprint and querry the server, but instead it just ask me to manually enter the ID. Is this the intended behaviour?
Yes, as said above, the plugin doesn't support fingerprinting. Additionally you're misunderstanding said option. It only works if either the album ID is present already or you can provide it manually. Fingerprinting has nothing to do with album IDs, because fingerprinting can only identify tracks, not albums. It's up to the application to use a smart algorithm for clustering single tracks to albums.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
skrech
post Feb 11 2013, 23:10
Post #183





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 30-September 11
Member No.: 94074



Thanks, soulsearchingsun smile.gif

Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

8 Pages V  « < 6 7 8
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 20:12