[misunderstanding] From: Representing frequency of n Hz needs sampling, From Topic ID: 93588 |
- No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service
![]() ![]() |
[misunderstanding] From: Representing frequency of n Hz needs sampling, From Topic ID: 93588 |
Feb 18 2012, 21:35
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4129 Joined: 2-September 02 Member No.: 3264 |
Put another way it is impossible to know with any certainty the amplitude of a pure tone with only two regularly spaced points per cycle. Ah, no, this isn't true. The only point at which reconstruction falls over is when the sampled waveform frequency reaches exactly half the sampling frequency or exceeds it. I suspect you've misread greynol's point, as you seem to be in agreement with him on the substance of his point. |
|
|
|
Feb 18 2012, 23:35
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 23-July 11 Member No.: 92474 |
Put another way it is impossible to know with any certainty the amplitude of a pure tone with only two regularly spaced points per cycle. Ah, no, this isn't true. The only point at which reconstruction falls over is when the sampled waveform frequency reaches exactly half the sampling frequency or exceeds it. I suspect you've misread greynol's point, as you seem to be in agreement with him on the substance of his point. Yes, you're right. Sorry greynol, I misunderstood your meaning. w -------------------- wakibaki.com
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 22:05 |