lossyWAV 1.3.0 Delphi to C++ Translation Thread, Added noise linear PCM bitdepth reduction method. |
![]() ![]() |
lossyWAV 1.3.0 Delphi to C++ Translation Thread, Added noise linear PCM bitdepth reduction method. |
Dec 16 2012, 23:11
Post
#76
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
Got sidetracked again - I'm going to add an option to convert any valid input audio (9-bit to 32-bit signed integer) to Float16, with or without adaptive / fixed noise-shaping. This will require the same messing about with the WAV handling code that I had to do for TransPCM. ETA is sometime early in the new year.
-------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Jan 3 2013, 16:44
Post
#77
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 16-August 12 Member No.: 102388 |
any progress on lossywav?
|
|
|
|
Jan 3 2013, 23:28
Post
#78
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
Still working on it, still distracted by the Elite: Dangerous KickStarter....
-------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Jan 7 2013, 18:17
Post
#79
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 58 Joined: 4-October 11 From: VA Beach, VA Member No.: 94145 |
I've been experimenting with various compression levels in FLAC and -q X, and I've found that for certain tracks, -0 compresses much more efficiently than higher levels, and is practically equivalent with at least one of the tracks I tested at -8. Extraportable combined with -0 might very well make for the most overall efficient decode combination ever. Exciting stuff.
-------------------- FLAC -2 w/ lossyWAV 1.3.0i -q X -i
|
|
|
|
Jan 18 2013, 21:26
Post
#80
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
lossyWAV beta 1.3.0g attached to post #1 in this thread.
-------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Jan 20 2013, 08:25
Post
#81
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 58 Joined: 4-October 11 From: VA Beach, VA Member No.: 94145 |
lossyWAV beta 1.3.0g attached to post #1 in this thread. Neat! I'm getting an average of 2 to 3 kbps reduction at level 0 compression for the material I've tested so far. It also seems to average faster processing than 1.3.0a, which is what I was using previously. -------------------- FLAC -2 w/ lossyWAV 1.3.0i -q X -i
|
|
|
|
Jan 20 2013, 18:00
Post
#82
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
I'm getting an average of 2 to 3 kbps reduction at level 0 compression for the material I've tested so far. I've carried out a FLAC settings comparison test (based on my 55 problem sample test set) and will post the results this evening.-------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Jan 20 2013, 22:44
Post
#83
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
I did a bit of testing with my 55 problem sample set (12:43.933 of audio) processed using "-q X" and got the following results:
CODE +------------------+---------------------+
| FLAC | Relative | | Encoder +----------+----------+ | Setting | Size | Time | +------------------+----------+----------+ | -8 -m -r 8 -p | 97.66% | 2187% | | -8 -r 8 -p | 97.66% | 2089% | | -8 -e -r 8 -p | 97.66% | 2094% | | -8 -e -m -r 8 -p | 97.66% | 2105% | | -8 -e -p | 97.66% | 1599% | | -8 -p | 97.66% | 1615% | | -8 -m -p | 97.66% | 1616% | | -8 -e -m -p | 97.66% | 1634% | | -6 -e -m -r 8 -p | 98.06% | 1689% | | -7 -e -r 8 -p | 98.06% | 1694% | | -6 -e -r 8 -p | 98.06% | 1695% | | -7 -e -m -r 8 -p | 98.06% | 1697% | | -4 -e -m -r 8 -p | 98.06% | 1701% | | -7 -r 8 -p | 98.06% | 1705% | | -7 -m -r 8 -p | 98.06% | 1710% | | -5 -e -m -r 8 -p | 98.06% | 1723% | | -5 -e -r 8 -p | 98.06% | 1799% | | -7 -e -p | 98.06% | 1215% | | -6 -e -p | 98.06% | 1220% | | -6 -e -m -p | 98.06% | 1222% | | -7 -m -p | 98.06% | 1222% | | -7 -e -m -p | 98.06% | 1224% | | -7 -p | 98.06% | 1225% | | -5 -e -p | 98.10% | 983% | | -5 -e -m -p | 98.10% | 1020% | | -4 -e -m -p | 98.18% | 825% | | -8 -r 8 | 98.36% | 368% | | -8 -m -r 8 | 98.36% | 370% | | -8 -e -m -r 8 | 98.36% | 374% | | -8 -e -r 8 | 98.36% | 379% | | -8 -e -m | 98.36% | 249% | | -8 -m | 98.36% | 249% | | -8 | 98.36% | 250% | | -8 -e | 98.36% | 250% | | -3 -e -m -r 8 -p | 98.69% | 1449% | | -6 -e -m -r 8 | 98.80% | 294% | | -7 -e -r 8 | 98.80% | 295% | | -7 -r 8 | 98.80% | 295% | | -5 -e -r 8 | 98.80% | 296% | | -7 -e -m -r 8 | 98.80% | 296% | | -6 -e -r 8 | 98.80% | 296% | | -4 -e -m -r 8 | 98.80% | 298% | | -7 -m -r 8 | 98.80% | 298% | | -5 -e -m -r 8 | 98.80% | 318% | | -6 -e -m | 98.81% | 174% | | -7 -e -m | 98.81% | 175% | | -6 -e | 98.81% | 176% | | -7 -m | 98.81% | 177% | | -7 -e | 98.81% | 183% | | -7 | 98.81% | 189% | | -3 -e -m -p | 98.82% | 605% | | -5 -e | 98.86% | 127% | | -5 -e -m | 98.86% | 138% | | -4 -e -m | 98.95% | 105% | | -3 -e -m -r 8 | 99.40% | 261% | | -6 -m -r 8 -p | 99.42% | 201% | | -6 -r 8 -p | 99.42% | 205% | | -5 -r 8 -p | 99.42% | 206% | | -5 -m -r 8 -p | 99.42% | 209% | | -4 -m -r 8 -p | 99.42% | 215% | | -6 -m -p | 99.42% | 137% | | -6 -p | 99.42% | 138% | | -5 -m -p | 99.45% | 106% | | -5 -p | 99.45% | 108% | | -4 -m -p | 99.51% | 87% | | -3 -e -m | 99.55% | 71% | | -3 -m -r 8 -p | 99.86% | 209% | | -3 -m -p | 99.95% | 88% | | -6 -m -r 8 | 99.97% | 28% | | -6 -r 8 | 99.97% | 31% | | -5 -m -r 8 | 99.97% | 32% | | -4 -m -r 8 | 99.97% | 33% | | -5 -r 8 | 99.97% | 33% | | -6 -m | 99.97% | 6% | | -6 | 99.97% | 7% | | -5 -m | 100.00% | -1% | +------------------+----------+----------+ | -5 | 100.00% | 0% | +------------------+----------+----------+ | -4 -m | 100.06% | -5% | | -3 -m -r 8 | 100.44% | 27% | | -3 -m | 100.52% | -9% | | -3 -e -r 8 -p | 100.54% | 678% | | -3 -e -p | 100.69% | 279% | | -3 -e -r 8 | 101.28% | 102% | | -3 -e | 101.45% | 9% | | -3 -r 8 -p | 101.76% | 78% | | -3 -p | 101.87% | 20% | | -3 -r 8 | 102.37% | -15% | | -3 | 102.48% | -30% | | -4 -e -r 8 -p | 102.59% | 846% | | -4 -e -p | 102.74% | 403% | | -4 -e -r 8 | 103.33% | 130% | | -4 -e | 103.50% | 28% | | -4 -r 8 -p | 104.08% | 85% | | -4 -p | 104.19% | 22% | | -4 -r 8 | 104.64% | -8% | | -4 | 104.76% | -28% | | -2 -e -m -r 8 -p | 108.34% | 113% | | 0 -e -m -r 8 -p | 108.34% | 114% | | 0 -e -m -r 8 | 108.34% | 114% | | -2 -e -m -r 8 | 108.34% | 115% | | -1 -e -m -r 8 | 108.34% | 115% | | -1 -e -m -r 8 -p | 108.34% | 117% | | -2 -e -r 8 -p | 108.34% | 118% | | -2 -e -r 8 | 108.34% | 119% | | -2 -r 8 | 108.50% | -4% | | 0 -m -r 8 -p | 108.50% | -3% | | 0 -m -r 8 | 108.50% | -3% | | -1 -m -r 8 -p | 108.50% | -2% | | -2 -r 8 -p | 108.50% | -1% | | -2 -m -r 8 | 108.50% | -1% | | -1 -m -r 8 | 108.50% | 0% | | -2 -m -r 8 -p | 108.50% | 5% | | -2 -e -m -p | 108.65% | -2% | | -2 -e -m | 108.65% | -1% | | -1 -e -m -p | 108.65% | -1% | | 0 -e -m -p | 108.65% | -1% | | 0 -e -m | 108.65% | -1% | | -1 -e -m | 108.65% | 2% | | -2 -e -p | 108.65% | 5% | | -2 -e | 108.65% | 7% | | 0 -m | 108.71% | -28% | | 0 -m -p | 108.71% | -28% | | -1 -m | 108.71% | -27% | | -2 -m -p | 108.71% | -27% | | -2 | 108.71% | -27% | | -2 -m | 108.71% | -25% | | -2 -p | 108.71% | -23% | | -1 -m -p | 108.71% | -21% | | 0 -e -r 8 -p | 110.94% | 30% | | 0 -e -r 8 | 110.94% | 35% | | 0 -r 8 -p | 111.12% | -31% | | 0 -r 8 | 111.12% | -28% | | 0 -e | 111.29% | -29% | | 0 -e -p | 111.29% | -25% | | 0 -p | 111.37% | -41% | | 0 | 111.37% | -34% | | -1 -e -r 8 -p | 113.83% | 34% | | -1 -e -r 8 | 113.83% | 44% | | -1 -r 8 -p | 114.06% | -27% | | -1 -r 8 | 114.06% | -24% | | -1 -e -p | 114.18% | -20% | | -1 -e | 114.18% | -19% | | -1 -p | 114.31% | -39% | | -1 | 114.31% | -38% | +------------------+----------+----------+ This post has been edited by Nick.C: Jan 23 2013, 22:20 -------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Jan 23 2013, 22:19
Post
#84
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
lossyWAV beta 1.3.0h attached to post #1 in this thread.
-------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 23:20
Post
#85
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
lossyWAV beta 1.3.0i attached to post #1 in this thread.
-------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Feb 8 2013, 22:31
Post
#86
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
lossyWAV beta 1.3.0j attached to post #1 in this thread.
-------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Feb 19 2013, 23:31
Post
#87
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 51 Joined: 6-March 07 Member No.: 41244 |
What is the penalty (if any) for using the -i switch? Slower encoding, higher risk of artifacts, or both? For someone not that concerned with filsesize, is the new noise shaping routine preferable to the default?
|
|
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 22:03
Post
#88
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
Hi Cynic,
The penalty is simply that the noise shaping is a bit more aggressive in trying to conform to the lossless audio spectrum. This saves about 1% of the resultant lossyFLAC size when compressed at --extraportable, less at higher quality levels. I am currently working on a (very) simplistic psymodel based on masking using the Bark scale. This may be a wrong turn, but it is an option for both the classic method and the --interp-curve method of determining the basis shape of the noise spectrum. Nick. -------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Mar 2 2013, 21:20
Post
#89
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 12-January 13 Member No.: 105821 |
Out of curiousity, why does the distribution include a "gpl.txt" file? I thought it is for open source software.
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2013, 17:33
Post
#90
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
When v1.40 is released, the source will be as well in a similar manner to the previous versions.
-------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2013, 21:27
Post
#91
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
lossyWAV beta 1.3.0k attached to post #1 in this thread.
[edit] updated to beta 1.3.0k2 [/edit] [edit2] updated to beta 1.3.0k3 [/edit2] This post has been edited by Nick.C: Mar 8 2013, 22:26 -------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2013, 23:04
Post
#92
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
lossyWAV beta 1.3.0m attached to post #1 in this thread.
-------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Mar 30 2013, 15:14
Post
#93
|
|
![]() lossyWAV Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1721 Joined: 11-April 07 From: Wherever here is Member No.: 42400 |
lossyWAV beta 1.3.0n attached to post #1 in this thread.
-------------------- lossyWAV -q X -i | FLAC -8 ~= 295kbps
SGS III (Rooted) + 64GB |
|
|
|
Mar 30 2013, 15:31
Post
#94
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1061 Joined: 4-May 04 From: France Member No.: 13875 |
Thanks for your work. I'm looking forward to 1.3.0 final.
-------------------- Save my friend from going homeless: http://outpost.fr/url/308w
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 06:35 |