Weird results using foo_flaccer |
![]() ![]() |
Weird results using foo_flaccer |
Feb 5 2004, 19:34
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 28 Joined: 13-July 03 Member No.: 7742 |
Hi,
foo_flaccer.dll seems to act very strange for me. Whenever I encode a file using foo_flaccer (I'm keeping full albums stored as single FLAC files) and want to play it back afterwards, seeking is terribly slow. Also, some of the tracks (I'm using a seperate .CUE file) can't be played back at all. The console just comes up and says something like this: QUOTE ERROR (CORE) : error opening file for playback : INFO (CORE) : location: "file://F:\FLAC\Black HipHop, RnB\Obie Trice\(2003) Cheers\Obie Trice - (2003) Cheers.cue" (6) It also seems that decoding is very slow. The weird thing is, when I'm using the CLI encoder along with flac.exe (1.1.0) from the FLAC homepage, seeking is almost instantly and all the tracks can be played back. Decoding is quite fast too. The playback generally seems much smoother. I don't know if that helps, but I'm using an AthlonXP2200+, fully patched WinXP SP1, an SBAudigy Player and foobar0.8b6. The problem exists in foobar 0.7.7b too as far as I saw. Thanks in advance. Edit: I just noticed this might fit better in the Support forum, but didn't find a move or delete function anywhere so... sorry This post has been edited by greeny: Feb 5 2004, 19:40 |
|
|
|
Feb 5 2004, 21:21
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 202 Joined: 13-February 02 From: Sweden Member No.: 1318 |
Just tested it and I can confirm it. (fb2k 0.8 beta 6 + foo_flaccer 0.4.0).
The output flac-file is missing the SEEKTABLE block, thus making seeking very slow for large files. |
|
|
|
Feb 5 2004, 21:42
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 28 Joined: 13-July 03 Member No.: 7742 |
I just noticed that one of my CLI-encoded FLAC files has got the same problem with one track not being able to be played back... anyone know what's up with that?
I got suspicious because I added replaygain info to alle the tracks and one of them says +0.00dB. The file has obviously been skipped. If I try to play it back I get the error described above. All the other tracks from the album play fine. Kind of weird as it is the same file for all of them. Edit: I uploaded an image for you to see.
This post has been edited by greeny: Feb 5 2004, 21:46 |
|
|
|
Feb 5 2004, 22:19
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 394 Joined: 31-October 01 Member No.: 386 |
Hi Greeny,
Sorry for going off topic, but are those percentages in your screenshot ("FLAC(62%)") the compression ratios? If so, how do you get them? |
|
|
|
Feb 5 2004, 22:24
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 28 Joined: 13-July 03 Member No.: 7742 |
QUOTE (Speek @ Feb 5 2004, 01:19 PM) Hi Greeny, Sorry for going off topic, but are those percentages in your screenshot ("FLAC(62%)") the compression ratios? If so, how do you get them? It's the FLAC files' sizes compared to the WAVs' sizes. You can do it like that: CODE $muldiv(%__bitrate%,100,1411)
This post has been edited by greeny: Feb 5 2004, 22:25 |
|
|
|
Feb 5 2004, 22:33
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 394 Joined: 31-October 01 Member No.: 386 |
That's nice. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Feb 6 2004, 18:18
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2041 Joined: 19-October 01 From: Finland Member No.: 322 |
I am tired of FLAC library and won't be working on foo_flaccer anymore. People who need FLAC support should stick to using flac.exe
|
|
|
|
Feb 6 2004, 18:58
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 210 Joined: 17-April 02 From: Vancouver, Canada Member No.: 1807 |
Too bad a good file format seems to have an developer-unfriendly library. I guess we can still use the CLI for FLAC.exe. Unless someone else picks up on Case's good work.
-------------------- http://goweropolis.no-ip.org:8080/blog/
|
|
|
|
Feb 6 2004, 18:59
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 28 Joined: 13-July 03 Member No.: 7742 |
Fair enough, thanks for the response Case.
But I still wonder why I can't seek up to certain tracks. It works if I embed the cuesheet in the FLAC file, but can it be that the format NEEDS to have seekpoints where the tracks begin? I rather think there's some bug in foo_flac, but tell me if I'm wrong |
|
|
|
Feb 6 2004, 19:06
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2041 Joined: 19-October 01 From: Finland Member No.: 322 |
QUOTE (greeny @ Feb 6 2004, 07:59 PM) But I still wonder why I can't seek up to certain tracks. It works if I embed the cuesheet in the FLAC file, but can it be that the format NEEDS to have seekpoints where the tracks begin? I rather think there's some bug in foo_flac, but tell me if I'm wrong Bug in libflac. It has been reported to Coalson and as far as I know he has been sent links to samples where this occurs. |
|
|
|
Feb 6 2004, 20:51
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 28 Joined: 13-July 03 Member No.: 7742 |
Ok, thanks for the information.
|
|
|
|
Mar 23 2004, 05:49
Post
#12
|
|
|
FLAC Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1526 Joined: 27-February 02 Member No.: 1408 |
OK, the problem that was causing playback to stop after some seeks has been fixed in libFLAC in CVS (see end of thread here).
as for the problem with slow seeking on large files with no seektable, I have a patch that speeds that up drastically; I haven't committed it yet until I do some more testing. Josh |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 13:19 |