Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Vorbis Listening Test (Read 77861 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Vorbis Listening Test

Reply #150 –
Quote
on one sample the noise was audible up to -q7. Obviously, the prebeta2 didn't solve the (or maybe "a") noise issue at high bitrate settings.

Doesn't the noise problem occur in GT3? If GT3 is better, it has the possibility of the problem of pre-echo (or block switching).
Simultaneously, I am interested in the sample.

Vorbis Listening Test

Reply #151 –
I didn't compared it with GT3 (or even with CVS encoder - only with mpc  ).
I'll probably investigate further, with the latest encoder (I used the pre-beta2).

For uploading, it's possible, but not before the next week. Sorry... (I must also find again this sample, or similar ones).
Wavpack Hybrid: one encoder for all scenarios
WavPack -c4.5hx6 (44100Hz & 48000Hz) ≈ 390 kbps + correction file
WavPack -c4hx6 (96000Hz) ≈ 768 kbps + correction file
WavPack -h (SACD & DSD) ≈ 2400 kbps at 2.8224 MHz

Vorbis Listening Test

Reply #152 –
I've done some testings on the samples cause typical Vorbis' artifacts as guruboolez already mentioned.

Brahms3: I prefer aoTuVb2.
Castanets: I prefer GT3b2.

Vorbis Listening Test

Reply #153 –
OK, somebody please point me to the EXACT encoder I should be using for my test, so that we avoid last-minute mistakes.

Thank-you.

Vorbis Listening Test

Reply #154 –
Quote
For uploading, it's possible, but not before the next week.

Thanks.

Quote
Brahms3: I prefer aoTuVb2.
Castanets: I prefer GT3b2.

I am also the same opinion as you.   

Quote
somebody please point me to the EXACT encoder I should be using for my test, so that we avoid last-minute mistakes.

Please use "aoTuV beta2 Win32 OggEnc-locale fix" of aoTuV test page. This is an equivalent for a reference binary. 

Vorbis Listening Test

Reply #155 –
Quote
Please use "aoTuV beta2 Win32 OggEnc-locale fix" of aoTuV test page. This is an equivalent for a reference binary. 

Thank-you very much.

Vorbis Listening Test

Reply #156 –
I've found my noisy sample, and uploaded here:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....ndpost&p=208504
Wavpack Hybrid: one encoder for all scenarios
WavPack -c4.5hx6 (44100Hz & 48000Hz) ≈ 390 kbps + correction file
WavPack -c4hx6 (96000Hz) ≈ 768 kbps + correction file
WavPack -h (SACD & DSD) ≈ 2400 kbps at 2.8224 MHz

Vorbis Listening Test

Reply #157 –
@guruboolez

I checked the sample by which you were uploaded.
In order to correct this difference, it is likely to take time considerably. Probably, many experiments are needed, also considering balance with other samples.

If an experiment succeeds, it may be improved by the future version.

Vorbis Listening Test

Reply #159 –
Quote
If it's wrong, scream now before it is too late :B

No problem.

Vorbis Listening Test

Reply #160 –
Guys, how about compiling an aoTuvb2 plugin for Adobe Audition (Cool Edit Pro)?