mppenc 1.04, mppdec 1.04, WinAMP plugins 0.94, XMMS plugin 0 |
![]() ![]() |
mppenc 1.04, mppdec 1.04, WinAMP plugins 0.94, XMMS plugin 0 |
May 27 2002, 23:05
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2053 Joined: 19-October 01 From: Finland Member No.: 322 |
* Files with PNS are marked as SV 7.1 to prevent confusion with old decoders
* URL for download displayed on unknown StreamVersions * Bug fixes in XMMS * mppenc now needs less bitrate while at least maintaining the quality * smart help screens for mppenc * Changed overwrite behavior of mppenc http://www.uni-jena.de/~pfk/MPP/ * Update: Improved 1.06 available * |
|
|
|
May 27 2002, 23:23
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2053 Joined: 19-October 01 From: Finland Member No.: 322 |
Compiled Windows binaries for 16...32 bit decoders available here.
|
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 00:07
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 2372 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 3 |
There seems to be a weird little bug in the latest Winamp plug-ins, concerning filenames.
I noticed that if an MPC file doesn't have any tags, the plugin tries to fill in the fields by itself. It can 'guess' the album name/year, song artist/title and number from the foldername and filename. Works pretty good, but today i played an album where the songs had these names: 01 Notorious B.I.G. - Notorious Thugs.mpc 02 Notorious B.I.G. - Miss U.mpc 03 Notorious B.I.G. - Another.mpc ... The plugin failed in retrieving the tag info, displaying this playlist: 1. Mpc 2 - - Notorious Thugs 2. Mpc 2 - - Miss U 3. Mpc 2 - - Another In the "Info" tab of Winamp, it was all mixed up, for instance: Track #: "03 Notorious B.I.G", Title: "- Another", Artist: "Mpc 2". I reckon this is because of the extra dots in the filename... but what can i do, that's what the guy is (was) called. |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 00:13
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2053 Joined: 19-October 01 From: Finland Member No.: 322 |
QUOTE Originally posted by CiTay
In the "Info" tab of Winamp, it was all mixed up, for instance: Track #: "03 Notorious B.I.G", Title: "- Another", Artist: "Mpc 2". I reckon this is because of the extra dots in the filename... but what can i do, that's what the guy is (was) called. Thanks for reporting, I had included one naming scheme in the middle of the old ones and that caused the problem. It should be fixed in this version. |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 00:57
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 195 Joined: 10-February 02 From: One Mile Up Member No.: 1299 |
Is it possible to directly convert older files into the new version to pick up the space savings?
|
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 01:33
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 2372 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 3 |
QUOTE Originally posted by Case
Thanks for reporting, I had included one naming scheme in the middle of the old ones and that caused the problem. It should be fixed in this version. Ah yes, the bug is fixed. Thanks! |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 01:50
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 136 Joined: 10-November 01 From: AUS Member No.: 433 |
Chemical Brothers "Dig Your Own Hole" - Electronica, Trip-Hop:
mppenc 1.02 --xtreme (no tweaks): 86.0 MB; 190 kbps ave mppenc 1.04 --xtreme (no tweaks): 74.8 MB; 164 kbps ave What have you done, Frank, to reduce the encoded file sizes? Great work. Addendum: Richard Thompson "Mock Tudor" - British Folk/Rock: mppenc 1.02 --xtreme (no tweaks): 80.3 MB; 204 kbps ave mppenc 1.04 --xtreme (no tweaks): 78.3 MB; 198 kbps ave Apparently the aggressive bitrate savings are to be had in electronica, not folk/rock. -------------------- Ruse
____________________________ Don't let the uncertainty turn you around, Go out and make a joyful sound. |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 03:04
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 248 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 38 |
My mileage is a little less impressive, but I use a command-line with more overkill:
--insane --nmt 16 --tmn 32 --verbose --verbose I encoded a live show that was an hour duration. With 1.02, the file size was 136MB; with 1.04 the file size is 134MB. It would appear then, that the new encoder makes more of a difference shaving the bitrate with less aggressive settings... The sound quality is superb, as always. Case, the 24-bit decoder works fine, too. Many thanks. |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 04:20
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 105 Joined: 18-October 01 From: St Louis, MO, USA Member No.: 313 |
QUOTE Originally posted by Ruse
mppenc 1.02 --xtreme (no tweaks): 86.0 MB; 190 kbps ave mppenc 1.04 --xtreme (no tweaks): 74.8 MB; 164 kbps ave Now thats a significant reduction. These bitrates (164) more or less fall into the 'standard' category. Now if there's no difference in sound quality, thats a really good achievement. But is so ? Or is Frank trying to prove that the 'standard' bitrates are indeed 'no different' than the 'xtreme' bitrates as far as quality is concerned ? Anyone checked out the bitrate differences for 'standard' ? |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 04:41
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/showth...15496#post15496
I think the developers liked Garf's suggestion. -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 05:03
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 248 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 38 |
QUOTE Originally posted by rjamorim
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/showth...15496#post15496 I think the developers liked Garf's suggestion. Is that why the bitrate decreased? |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 05:14
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
QUOTE Originally posted by macdaddy
Is that why the bitrate decreased? I doubt. I was just kidding. -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 05:30
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 136 Joined: 10-November 01 From: AUS Member No.: 433 |
QUOTE Originally posted by rjamorim
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/showth...15496#post15496 I think the developers liked Garf's suggestion. Not a bad idea of Garf's! Trouble is in this instance, the --xtreme setting --verbose comments confirm that --xtreme is still nmt 8, tmn 20, and other parameters appear unchanged: so what has happened? -------------------- Ruse
____________________________ Don't let the uncertainty turn you around, Go out and make a joyful sound. |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 05:33
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
QUOTE Originally posted by Ruse
Trouble is in this instance, the --xtreme setting --verbose comments confirm that --xtreme is still nmt 8, tmn 20, and other parameters appear unchanged: so what has happened? Verbose was fux0red to give you the impression it's encoding with those parameters. (kidding again...) -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 10:04
Post
#15
|
|
|
Founder Group: Admin Posts: 2958 Joined: 26-August 02 From: Nottingham, UK Member No.: 1 |
QUOTE Originally posted by Ruse
Chemical Brothers "Dig Your Own Hole" - Electronica, Trip-Hop: mppenc 1.02 --xtreme (no tweaks): 86.0 MB; 190 kbps ave mppenc 1.04 --xtreme (no tweaks): 74.8 MB; 164 kbps ave [...] Apparently the aggressive bitrate savings are to be had in electronica, not folk/rock. Bola "Fyuti" - IDM mppenc 1.02 --xtreme: 85.4 MB; 205.8 kbps mppenc 1.04 --xtreme: 81.2 MB; 196.3 kbps Another electronic album... not quite as much of a savings either so the bit reduction here don't seem to quite be universal, but it's still not bad. I haven't really had a chance to scrutinze the quality or encode much else though so I'll have to give that a shot and see how it works out. |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 13:52
Post
#16
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 22 Joined: 17-March 02 Member No.: 1549 |
> Anyone checked out the bitrate differences for 'standard' ?
A-ha 'Lifelines ' --standard (just one track, how do I check the average bitrate for the whole album?) 1.02 - 171.7kbps, 5.28mb 1.04 - 158.3kbps, 4.86mb -------------------- |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 14:01
Post
#17
|
|
![]() Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 2372 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 3 |
QUOTE Originally posted by Q!
(just one track, how do I check the average bitrate for the whole album?) Download EncSpot: http://www.guerillasoft.com/EncSpot2/EncSp...Basic%202.0.zip It can not only do MP3 analyzing, but also basic MPC analyzing. It shows the average bitrate for a folder in the lower left corner of it's window. |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 17:15
Post
#18
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 22 Joined: 17-March 02 Member No.: 1549 |
Thanks!
A-ha 'Lifelines ' (--standard) 1.02 - 76.4MB, 173.0kbps 1.04 - 68.4MB, 154.7kbps -------------------- |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 17:23
Post
#19
|
|
![]() MPC Developer Group: Developer Posts: 543 Joined: 15-December 01 From: Germany Member No.: 659 |
QUOTE Originally posted by CiTay
Download EncSpot: http://www.guerillasoft.com/EncSpot2/EncSp...Basic%202.0.zip It can not only do MP3 analyzing, but also basic MPC analyzing. It shows the average bitrate for a folder in the lower left corner of it's window. <<<Remark: The dialog boxes of # PHP List Quotes are clean of helping information about what this is>>> In one of the packages there's list.exe CODE list.exe *
list.exe CODE PCM size File size Ratio kbps Duration Param Frequency Name
0.889 0.080 128 0:05.042 (2x16 44.1 kHz) 100only.mp3 2.362 1.254 1.882 750 0:13.390 (2x16 44.1 kHz) 11.pac 0.882 0.046 73.9 0:05.000 (2x16 44.1 kHz) 60.pac 1.031 0.659 1.566 901 0:05.849 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Bassdrum.pac 1.072 0.510 2.102 671 0:06.082 (2x16 44.1 kHz) BlackBird.pac 1.161 0.173 6.687 211 0:06.583 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Castanets-v00_209Kb.mp2 1.161 0.194 5.956 237 0:06.583 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Castanets-v05_235Kb.mp2 1.161 0.228 5.077 278 0:06.583 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Castanets-v10_276Kb.mp2 1.161 0.267 4.335 326 0:06.583 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Castanets-v15_323Kb.mp2 1.170 0.631 1.855 761 0:06.634 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Castanets.pac 1.161 0.159 7.292 194 0:06.583 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Castanets_192Kb.mp2 1.831 0.124 48.1 0:20.767 (2x16 22050 Hz) Classic_48Kb.mp3 1.748 0.138 56.1 0:19.827 (2x16 22050 Hz) Classic_56Kb.mp3 2.035 1.236 1.645 858 0:11.538 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Daughter (Pearl Jam).pac 5.460 3.110 1.756 804 0:30.953 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Fools.pac 10.934 0.744 96.1 1:01.989 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Funky_96Kb.mp3 1.063 0.274 3.880 364 0:06.030 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Granados.pac 1.051 0.473 2.220 636 0:05.958 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Hex.pac 0.658 0.084 7.823 131 0:05.148 (2x16 32 kHz) Hobbit-q1.mp3 0.658 0.086 7.583 135 0:05.148 (2x16 32 kHz) Hobbit-q2.mp3 0.655 0.361 1.813 565 0:05.120 (2x16 32 kHz) Hobbit.pac 1.060 0.689 1.538 918 0:06.013 (2x16 44.1 kHz) KMFDM-Dogma.pac 2.023 0.869 2.326 607 0:11.471 (2x16 44.1 kHz) QueenGoodOldFashioned.pac 2.479 0.224 128 0:14.054 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Raspberry_Beret_128Kb.mp3 1.239 0.449 2.756 256 0:14.054 ( 16 44.1 kHz) Raspberry_Beret_256Kb.mp3 1.916 0.130 96.3 0:10.867 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Spot1_96Kb.mp3 2.004 0.136 96.3 0:11.363 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Spot2_96Kb.mp3 2.059 0.140 96.3 0:11.677 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Spot3_96Kb.mp3 1.004 0.091 128 0:05.695 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Test_128Kb.mp2 2.424 1.872 1.295 1090 0:13.744 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Tristania-ruins-intro.ape 1.455 1.106 1.316 1073 0:08.252 (2x16 44.1 kHz) applaud.pac 5.234 0.712 7.344 192 0:29.675 (2x16 44.1 kHz) applaus.mp3 5.237 3.014 1.737 812 0:29.690 (2x16 44.1 kHz) applaus.pac 1.031 0.659 1.566 901 0:05.849 (2x16 44.1 kHz) bassdrum.pac Error: 1002: invalid input file 2.813 1.490 1.888 748 0:15.950 (2x16 44.1 kHz) bi.pac 0.876 0.536 1.633 432 0:09.937 ( 16 44.1 kHz) cardigans.pac 3.305 1.333 2.479 569 0:18.739 (2x16 44.1 kHz) death2.pac 2.726 1.404 1.942 727 0:15.458 (2x16 44.1 kHz) dogies.pac 2.848 1.157 2.462 573 0:16.147 (2x16 44.1 kHz) dr4.pac 39.010 23.317 1.673 843 3:41.147 (2x16 44.1 kHz) drone.pac 10.584 5.665 1.868 755 1:00.002 (2x16 44.1 kHz) drone_short.pac 1.000 0.624 1.601 882 0:05.669 (2x16 44.1 kHz) else3.pac 0.882 0.458 1.922 734 0:05.000 (2x16 44.1 kHz) fatboy.pac 4.513 3.114 1.449 974 0:25.585 (2x16 44.1 kHz) ftb_samp.pac 2.990 0.271 128 0:16.953 (2x16 44.1 kHz) g_boink.mp3 7.064 0.961 7.345 192 0:40.046 (2x16 44.1 kHz) gitarre.mp3 7.066 1.625 4.346 325 0:40.060 (2x16 44.1 kHz) gitarre.pac 1.764 1.054 1.673 843 0:10.001 (2x16 44.1 kHz) goldc.pac 1.626 0.820 1.982 712 0:09.220 (2x16 44.1 kHz) gonna_fly_now.pac 0.986 0.385 2.563 551 0:05.593 (2x16 44.1 kHz) guitar.pac 0.446 0.177 2.511 562 0:02.531 (2x16 44.1 kHz) hihat.pac 1.834 0.827 2.216 637 0:10.398 (2x16 44.1 kHz) instruments.pac 6.171 3.782 1.631 865 0:34.984 (2x16 44.1 kHz) iron.pac 1.289 0.859 1.501 470 0:14.624 ( 16 44.1 kHz) jacob.pac 1.392 0.643 2.166 473 0:10.880 (2x16 32 kHz) jewharp.pac 0.745 0.404 1.844 555 0:05.824 (2x16 32 kHz) jo3.pac 0.751 0.069 94.1 0:05.868 (2x16 32 kHz) jo3q1.mp3 0.751 0.071 97.7 0:05.868 (2x16 32 kHz) jo3q2.mp3 1.870 0.915 2.043 691 0:10.606 (2x16 44.1 kHz) lalaw.pac 2.514 1.058 2.376 594 0:14.257 (2x16 44.1 kHz) left-dist.pac 0.883 0.643 1.374 1027 0:05.007 (2x16 44.1 kHz) liberate.pac 1.731 0.970 1.783 791 0:09.813 (2x16 44.1 kHz) main_theme.pac 2.455 1.442 1.702 414 0:27.837 ( 16 44.1 kHz) mixed.pac 1.866 0.775 2.406 587 0:10.580 (2x16 44.1 kHz) mouth_organ.pac 0.700 0.365 1.913 738 0:03.968 (2x16 44.1 kHz) mstest.pac 10.584 4.633 2.284 618 1:00.000 (2x16 44.1 kHz) music.pac 2.259 1.573 1.437 982 0:12.812 (2x16 44.1 kHz) oasis.pac 1.227 0.698 1.758 803 0:06.961 (2x16 44.1 kHz) ogpulse.pac 1.812 0.614 2.948 479 0:10.272 (2x16 44.1 kHz) piano.pac 2.648 1.347 1.965 718 0:15.013 (2x16 44.1 kHz) pipes.pac 1.400 0.970 1.443 978 0:07.939 (2x16 44.1 kHz) qrbic_see.pac 1.037 0.396 2.616 540 0:05.884 (2x16 44.1 kHz) short.pac 2.042 1.069 1.909 739 0:11.579 (2x16 44.1 kHz) si.pac 4.483 2.578 1.739 812 0:25.415 (2x16 44.1 kHz) spahm.pac 1.568 1.042 1.504 938 0:08.893 (2x16 44.1 kHz) st_jacob.pac 1.400 0.414 3.379 418 0:07.936 (2x16 44.1 kHz) t1.pac 2.539 0.713 3.561 396 0:14.395 (2x16 44.1 kHz) test.pac 2.178 0.948 2.296 615 0:12.352 (2x16 44.1 kHz) testsignal1.pac 0.714 0.337 2.117 667 0:04.048 (2x16 44.1 kHz) testsignal2.pac 0.026 0.009 2.718 260 0:00.300 ( 16 44.1 kHz) testsignal3.pac 0.790 0.360 2.191 644 0:04.480 (2x16 44.1 kHz) testsignal4.pac 1.355 0.940 1.442 979 0:07.687 (2x16 44.1 kHz) tpd.pac 1.917 1.201 1.597 442 0:21.745 ( 16 44.1 kHz) tr-left.pac 0.672 0.397 1.692 834 0:03.810 (2x16 44.1 kHz) track7.pac 1.478 0.573 2.579 547 0:08.379 (2x16 44.1 kHz) vangelis1.pac 0.823 0.472 1.744 809 0:04.670 (2x16 44.1 kHz) vbrtest.pac 2.095 1.397 1.499 941 0:11.879 (2x16 44.1 kHz) velvet.pac 3.707 2.179 1.701 830 0:21.016 (2x16 44.1 kHz) wait.pac 5.277 3.592 1.469 961 0:29.916 (2x16 44.1 kHz) youcantdothat.pac 237.993 106.635 2.232 598 23:45.724 ---Sum--- -------------------- -- Frank Klemm
|
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 17:46
Post
#20
|
|
![]() Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 2372 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 3 |
Yes, seems like this would also work. But what's that:
QUOTE 10.934 0.744 96.1 1:01.989 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Funky_96Kb.mp3
... 1.916 0.130 96.3 0:10.867 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Spot1_96Kb.mp3 2.004 0.136 96.3 0:11.363 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Spot2_96Kb.mp3 2.059 0.140 96.3 0:11.677 (2x16 44.1 kHz) Spot3_96Kb.mp3 Invalid MP3 framesizes... list.exe needs some accuracy tunings. |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 18:20
Post
#21
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 915 Joined: 15-December 01 From: Germany Member No.: 662 |
Is mppenc 1.04 based on one of the four versions of mppenc, that were posted recently?
Just for the record, I encoded two trance compilations (eye trance 3 and 4 without the turntablemix) at --standard --nmt 8. v1.02: 414mb v1.04: 383mb That's a saving of 31mb or ~7.5%. If quality doesn't suffer, this is quite impressive imo. I'm still a little sceptical though, but I guess I've been brainwashed to just compare bitrates without actually listening. Everything sounds ok to me, but then again, I'm not the one to ask these things. |
|
|
|
May 28 2002, 22:26
Post
#22
|
|
![]() MPC Developer Group: Developer Posts: 543 Joined: 15-December 01 From: Germany Member No.: 659 |
QUOTE Originally posted by CiTay
Yes, seems like this would also work. But what's that: Invalid MP3 framesizes... list.exe needs some accuracy tunings. This is the exact bitrate of the file. Filesize * 8 bit/byte / playtime The program shows the really needed bitrate. A MP3 stream with 3 MByte ID3V2 tags can have 700...800 kbps (it is not difficult to find such nonsense in the internet, 15 MP3 files with 96 kbps, Xing encoded + cover images, the same images in every MP3 file) -------------------- -- Frank Klemm
|
|
|
|
May 29 2002, 00:48
Post
#23
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 135 Joined: 20-December 01 Member No.: 702 |
No one ever answered the question asked before... What is the reason for the bitrate drops in --xtreme and --standard in the new version of the encoder?
Also, I'm confused by your analysis of this site, Frank. I've never had a single problem with this site, let alone be confused by it. But...to each their own. Nick |
|
|
|
May 29 2002, 02:07
Post
#24
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 2797 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 6 |
The primary question raised again by NickSD was still not answered. :ponder:
-------------------- Juha Laaksonheimo
|
|
|
|
May 29 2002, 08:52
Post
#25
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 105 Joined: 18-October 01 From: St Louis, MO, USA Member No.: 313 |
I think this is deviating too much from the main topic. And the things behind he 'bitrate reduction' have not been addressed at all.
Appreciate if Frank (or someone else) could throw some light on whats behind this whole thingy of the significant birate reduction... Or whether the MPC developers really felt what Garf said (and what I believe too) is correct and made the 1.04 versions Cheers! experttech. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2013 - 06:36 |