Track Number in ID (WMA files) is +1 of the real track number |
Please read foobar2000 Tech Support Forum Rules before posting and comply with all the points.
Failure to provide all the information pointed out in the above document in your post is considered wasting other people's time and in extreme cases will lead to your topic getting locked without a reply.
See also: Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service.
![]() ![]() |
Track Number in ID (WMA files) is +1 of the real track number |
Apr 6 2007, 05:08
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 6-April 07 Member No.: 42251 |
Hi,
if I watch the properties of a WMA file the track number is everytime 1 higher then real. Winamp show the correct and other ID-Tagger even too. I hope you find this bug and can eleminate this one. With best regards Michi |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2007, 16:15
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 7-March 07 Member No.: 41259 |
I noticed that when converting from wma to mp3 the track number of the mp3 was one higher than it should be in the resulting id3v1 and id3v2 tags of the mp3s and reported it to this forum previously. Hopefully the next release will correct this "feature" as well as they are most likely related.
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2007, 21:38
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 6-April 07 Member No.: 42251 |
I noticed that when converting from wma to mp3 the track number of the mp3 was one higher than it should be in the resulting id3v1 and id3v2 tags of the mp3s and reported it to this forum previously. Hopefully the next release will correct this "feature" as well as they are most likely related. Yes, my library has now this 'error' in all converted files :-( . I notice this too late. With best regards Michael |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2007, 21:42
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1190 Joined: 12-January 06 From: Cambridge, MA Member No.: 27052 |
I noticed that when converting from wma to mp3 the track number of the mp3 was one higher than it should be in the resulting id3v1 and id3v2 tags of the mp3s and reported it to this forum previously. Hopefully the next release will correct this "feature" as well as they are most likely related. Yes, my library has now this 'error' in all converted files :-( . I notice this too late. With best regards Michael Can't you just use masstagger to correct the problem? I'm thinking something along the lines of: Format Value from other field-> Destination Field: Title Code: $sub(%tracknumber%,1) I mean if it's adding 1 to all the tracknumber, why not just subtract 1 from all of them? |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2007, 22:44
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 6-April 07 Member No.: 42251 |
Can't you just use masstagger to correct the problem? I'm thinking something along the lines of: Format Value from other field-> Destination Field: Title Code: $sub(%tracknumber%,1) I mean if it's adding 1 to all the tracknumber, why not just subtract 1 from all of them? First of all ... many thanks :-) This helps me very much. But I hope that this extra step ist unnecessary in the next version of this great software :-) Have a nice weekend Michael |
|
|
|
Sep 28 2007, 17:53
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 28-September 07 Member No.: 47427 |
I just wanted to add that this problem still exists in the latest beta version. A fix would be highly appreciated...
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2007, 12:02
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 18-December 07 Member No.: 49654 |
First of all thanks for the small Masstag Script.
Works well as a workaround. But I want to add that this "+1 Tagnumber" feature at least still is available in 0.9.4.5. |
|
|
|
Dec 18 2007, 14:21
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Mp3tag developer Group: FB2K Moderator (Donating) Posts: 854 Joined: 5-May 03 From: Dresden, Germany Member No.: 6411 |
But I want to add that this "+1 Tagnumber" feature at least still is available in 0.9.4.5. It's not in 0.9.5.On a sidenote: The WMA tagging format is really funny when it comes to tracknumbers. The specification actually contains two attributes for storing tracknumbers. The first, WM/Track, only exists for backward compatibility and is -- now the fun part -- zero-based! The second, WM/TrackNumber, is surely the way to go as it is the current recommended tracknumber attribute for WMA tags without any insane constraints. -------------------- Mp3tag - universal multi-format tag editor
http://www.mp3tag.de/en/ |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2007, 01:44
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 18-December 07 Member No.: 49654 |
Maybe I did something wrong, but I just tried 0.9.5 beta8 and it still contains the +1 "feature".
This post has been edited by egalus: Dec 19 2007, 01:49 |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2007, 10:48
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Mp3tag developer Group: FB2K Moderator (Donating) Posts: 854 Joined: 5-May 03 From: Dresden, Germany Member No.: 6411 |
Maybe I did something wrong, but I just tried 0.9.5 beta8 and it still contains the +1 "feature". I can't reproduce it with freshly tagged WMA files in 0.9.5 beta 8. Can you provide step-by-step instructions on how to reproduce it?
-------------------- Mp3tag - universal multi-format tag editor
http://www.mp3tag.de/en/ |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2007, 11:09
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 18-December 07 Member No.: 49654 |
I just drag a wma onto my playlist and it adds with actual tracknumber+1 to the playlist.
For example dragging 01 - One Vision (Extended Version).wma (wtih tracknumber reported to be 1 in windows file details) onto my clean default playlist leads to a Display of Track No 02 in foobar 0.9.5 beta8. Right click -> Properties in foobar also displays Track Number | 2 I just uninstalled foobar (and all it's options) and reinstalled it to be sure I did not change any settings in foobar 0.9.5.beta8 just to be sure I don't report anything I can't reproduce |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2007, 11:11
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Mp3tag developer Group: FB2K Moderator (Donating) Posts: 854 Joined: 5-May 03 From: Dresden, Germany Member No.: 6411 |
Can you send me this file for analyzing the issue?
-------------------- Mp3tag - universal multi-format tag editor
http://www.mp3tag.de/en/ |
|
|
|
Apr 8 2008, 19:44
Post
#13
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 3-April 08 Member No.: 52523 |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 07:59 |