Vorbis RC3 quality settings |
![]() ![]() |
Vorbis RC3 quality settings |
Dec 22 2001, 15:42
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 315 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 53 |
RC3 is almost ready to do, and now has two ways to specify encoding:
1) -m minimum -M -maximum b nominal 2) -q quality The quality indication goes from 0, which is nominally 64 kpbs, to 10, which is nominally 480kpbs, and is a floating point number. To get some indication of how bitrate changes as you change the quality setting, take a look here: http://www.maths.warwick.ac.uk/~jingram/ogg/ I (along with xercist from the #vorbis IRC channel) graphed bitrate-vs-quality for several well known samples, including hard-to-encode ones such as applaud.wav and fatboy.wav. The overall graph is as follows: http://www.maths.warwick.ac.uk/~jingram/ogg/group.png The big jump at q=5 is mainly down to the switching to lossless channel coupling. You'll also notice that the bitrate for q=n.99 is generally *larger* than that for q=n+1-- this is because the same settings are used for q in [n, n+1), and they are tuned for the lower end of that range. Have fun. |
|
|
|
Dec 22 2001, 16:11
Post
#2
|
|
![]() xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
The daily binary at rjamorim's site, has the quality option enabled and works fine. As examples, -q 5 produces an ABR of about 160kbps and -q 6 about 192kbps.
john33 |
|
|
|
Jan 5 2002, 06:48
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 4-January 02 Member No.: 915 |
Just for reference, I measured cut-off frequency(of LPF) at quality setting, by using white noise.
Also, it seems like white noise gives rise to much more bit rate than actual music. http://www2.ocn.ne.jp/~mp3lab/exp_lab/vorb...vorbis_rc3.html |
|
|
|
Jan 6 2002, 04:34
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 315 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 53 |
I've updated all the graphs to RC3 (no actual changed in bitrate, given that the encoder on 22/12 basically *was* RC3). I've also added a couple more hard to encode test samples.
In particular, I have a white noise sample. Interestingly, for qualities below 5, encoding this does not expend an enormous amount of bits -- but this soon changes for qualities above 5.5. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 12:21 |