Why has the --ns-bass setting been removed in LAME 3.99.x?, was: "ns-bass" |
  |
Why has the --ns-bass setting been removed in LAME 3.99.x?, was: "ns-bass" |
 Jan 7 2012, 16:35
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 29-November 01 Member No.: 563  |
I noticed that somewhere between LAME 3.98.4 and 3.99.3, the --ns-bass setting has been removed. Can somebody explain why this is?
|
 |
 
|
|
Jan 7 2012, 17:06
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2297 Joined: 9-October 05 From: Dormagen, Germany Member No.: 25015 |
QUOTE (NeoRenegade @ Jan 7 2012, 16:35)  I noticed that somewhere between LAME 3.98.4 and 3.99.3, the --ns-bass setting has been removed. Can somebody explain why this is? I removed it to make things easier and clearer. I gave up the --ns-bass/--ns-alto/--ns-treble options in favor of a minimum audio bitrate demand which I guess is easier to understand for most people and more desirable, especially as a reasonable minimum audio bitrate is defaulted for the various -Vx+ levels. IMO it's a good thing to just have to use -Vx+ instead of standard -Vx. -------------------- lame3100k -V0 --cvbr 9
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 7 2012, 17:15
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Developer Posts: 3036 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183 |
I think "3.99.x" means official LAME 3.99...3.99.3, not "functional extension 3.99.3x"
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 7 2012, 17:21
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 29-November 01 Member No.: 563 |
Yeah, I didn’t write “3.99.x”, that was written in by a mod who decided that the thread title “ns-bass” wasn’t descriptive enough.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 7 2012, 17:50
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2297 Joined: 9-October 05 From: Dormagen, Germany Member No.: 25015 |
As for standard Lame robert announced that he would remove the --ns-xxx options in 3.99 (not sure whether it was in a PM or a thread).
He uses them internally. -------------------- lame3100k -V0 --cvbr 9
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 11 2012, 13:13
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 29-November 01 Member No.: 563 |
Ah, okay. The reason I was wondering, is because for a long time, I had been using --ns-bass -8 on 128kbps encodings based on the advice of… somebody somewhere.
So I guess if such things are done internally now, it’s not something whose effect on quality I ought to worry about anymore, huh? |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 16:04 |
