aacPlus vs nero AAC |
![]() ![]() |
aacPlus vs nero AAC |
Nov 29 2006, 20:26
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 11-November 05 Member No.: 25699 |
Coding Technology aacPlus Encoder 8.0.0 or latest nero AAC codec, which is better??
Any good cd ripper with nero aac codec?? What settings are god for aacplus? What is the diference between aacplus and aacplus v2 Thanks, and sorry for my english This post has been edited by lordraiden: Nov 29 2006, 20:37 |
|
|
|
Nov 29 2006, 21:07
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 103 Joined: 7-February 05 From: Warsaw, Poland Member No.: 19663 |
Please use search function.
-------------------- Not really a Signature.
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2006, 21:20
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 11-November 05 Member No.: 25699 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2006, 22:03
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1593 Joined: 24-March 02 From: Revere, MA Member No.: 1607 |
QUOTE Coding Technology aacPlus Encoder 8.0.0 or latest nero AAC codec, which is better?? Any good cd ripper with nero aac codec?? What settings are god for aacplus? What is the diference between aacplus and aacplus v2 Thanks, and sorry for my english It depends on what circumstances you plan on using it for. I would go with the latest Nero AAC encoder. -------------------- College student/IT Assistant
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2006, 22:14
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 11-November 05 Member No.: 25699 |
I want encode my cds to aac for my ipod at 160 or 128, What software do you use for encode cds and files with nero aac encoder??
I used easy cdda extractor with nero codec but the new versions of this soft haven't support for nero codec only for AACplus Thanks |
|
|
|
Nov 29 2006, 22:41
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1593 Joined: 24-March 02 From: Revere, MA Member No.: 1607 |
QUOTE I want encode my cds to aac for my ipod at 160 or 128, What software do you use for encode cds and files with nero aac encoder?? I used easy cdda extractor with nero codec but the new versions of this soft haven't support for nero codec only for AACplus If your encoding to your Ipod go with the Itunes AAC encoder then. What you decide to rip with greatly depends on what OS you are on. http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=AAC_encoders This post has been edited by HotshotGG: Nov 29 2006, 22:42 -------------------- College student/IT Assistant
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2006, 23:06
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 11-November 05 Member No.: 25699 |
QUOTE I want encode my cds to aac for my ipod at 160 or 128, What software do you use for encode cds and files with nero aac encoder?? I used easy cdda extractor with nero codec but the new versions of this soft haven't support for nero codec only for AACplus If your encoding to your Ipod go with the Itunes AAC encoder then. What you decide to rip with greatly depends on what OS you are on. http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=AAC_encoders My OS is windows Why is better for ipod use apple codec than nero codec? Do you know any software for encode with nero aac codec? This post has been edited by lordraiden: Nov 29 2006, 23:06 |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2006, 00:02
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 103 Joined: 7-February 05 From: Warsaw, Poland Member No.: 19663 |
If you are using iPod, then most probably you already must use iTunes to transfer songs. AAC encoder in iTunes is of good quality, so using it would be most convenient for you.
And BTW - iPods don't support aacPlus, so using this format would give you bad results. -------------------- Not really a Signature.
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2006, 00:20
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 11-November 05 Member No.: 25699 |
If you are using iPod, then most probably you already must use iTunes to transfer songs. AAC encoder in iTunes is of good quality, so using it would be most convenient for you. And BTW - iPods don't support aacPlus, so using this format would give you bad results. But i like more nero codec, Do you know any software that uses nero codec?? |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2006, 00:26
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 103 Joined: 7-February 05 From: Warsaw, Poland Member No.: 19663 |
Any software which accepts commandline encoders, for example Exact Audio Copy or Foobar2000. And Nero commandline AAC encoder can be dowloaded for free, you don't need to be full Nero Burning software owner (just if you don't know).
-------------------- Not really a Signature.
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2006, 01:17
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 11-November 05 Member No.: 25699 |
Any software which accepts commandline encoders, for example Exact Audio Copy or Foobar2000. And Nero commandline AAC encoder can be dowloaded for free, you don't need to be full Nero Burning software owner (just if you don't know). Ok thaks i finally use eac with Ultimate EAC Pack r12 One more question, it is the same: aacenc32.dll 4.5.9.0 neroAacDec.exe 1.0.0.2 (Nero Digital Audio Decoder) Both encoders produces the same quality what is the diference, what is the best? , more new?? |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2006, 01:52
Post
#12
|
|
![]() A/V Moderator Group: Moderator Posts: 1666 Joined: 30-April 02 From: Slovenia Member No.: 1922 |
latest version of the nero encoder and decoder can be found @
http://www.nero.com/nerodigital/eng/down-ndaudio.php -------------------- PANIC: CPU 1: Cache Error (unrecoverable - dcache data) Eframe = 0x90000000208cf3b8
NOTICE - cpu 0 didn't dump TLB, may be hung |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2006, 08:31
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 135 Joined: 16-September 05 From: India Member No.: 24505 |
But i like more nero codec, Do you know any software that uses nero codec?? Be aware that there are issues with gapless playback on iPods when you use the Nero encoder. audiomars -------------------- Reason is immortal, all else mortal
- Pythagoras |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2006, 20:45
Post
#14
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 11-November 05 Member No.: 25699 |
>> aacenc32.dll 4.5.9.0 included in Nero 7 Premium
>> neroAacEnc.exe 1.0.0.2 (Nero Digital Audio encoder) Both encoders produces the same quality what is the diference? What is the best? aacenc32.dll is in the nero software it is more updated than neroAacEnc?? |
|
|
|
Nov 30 2006, 23:14
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 103 Joined: 7-February 05 From: Warsaw, Poland Member No.: 19663 |
Just use the latest neroAacEnc.exe - that's all.
-------------------- Not really a Signature.
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2006, 00:12
Post
#16
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 565 Joined: 26-February 06 Member No.: 28077 |
both of them should be the same, so it shouldn't be a surprise that they give the same or similar results.
|
|
|
|
Nov 3 2007, 19:49
Post
#17
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 30-March 06 Member No.: 28990 |
Coding Technology aacPlus Encoder 8.0.0 or latest nero AAC codec, which is better?? Any good cd ripper with nero aac codec?? What settings are god for aacplus? What is the diference between aacplus and aacplus v2 Thanks, and sorry for my english Where did you get the Coding Technology encoder? |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2007, 20:09
Post
#18
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 126 Joined: 9-March 06 From: NRW, Germany Member No.: 28371 |
QUOTE Where did you get the Coding Technology encoder? Isn't it part of Winamp? This post has been edited by LaserSokrates: Nov 3 2007, 20:10 |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2007, 20:56
Post
#19
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2019 Joined: 8-April 05 From: Cincinnati, OH Member No.: 21277 |
I think it is part of Winamp.
|
|
|
|
Nov 18 2007, 12:48
Post
#20
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 11-November 05 Member No.: 25699 |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 23:37 |