Nero AAC Codec Version 1.5.1.0 released |
  |
Nero AAC Codec Version 1.5.1.0 released |
 Dec 24 2009, 16:48
Post
#26
|
|
 Nero MPEG4 developer Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 1218 Joined: 11-October 01 From: LA Member No.: 267  |
QUOTE (jeffster @ Dec 24 2009, 01:27)  Hmmm... it doesn't work for me here unfortunately. I can issue the -help command but when I try to encode something it just crashes and Windows error reporting window pops up.  Are there some dependencies that weren't required with the previous version? BTW, my cpu is Intel Celeron (Tualatin) - Instructions: MMX, SSE It should work on machines with only SSE (and without any enhanced instruction set for that matter). You should be able to extract some more info form that WER window. |
 |
 
|
|
Dec 24 2009, 17:43
Post
#27
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 28 Joined: 22-September 07 Member No.: 47256 |
QUOTE (menno @ Dec 24 2009, 23:46) QUOTE (quadamage @ Dec 24 2009, 07:05) QUOTE (elmar3rd @ Dec 24 2009, 19:39) Works fine here with foobar2000, Win7 Pro 32 bit, i5-750 Works with foobar2000, but not perfectly. I converted a 5 minute WAV file to m4a (96000Hz Stereo -q 1.0 ), played it with foobar2000, the file length is wrong ( 15:45 ). WMP, iTunes, Quicktime, MPC do not have the similar problem. You probably need to update foobar2000, because older versions had an issue with the timescale for the iTunes gapless data. I use the latest stable version v0.9.6.9, do I need to upgrade to v1.0 beta? |
|
|
|
|
Dec 24 2009, 18:50
Post
#28
|
|
|
Nero MPEG4 developer Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 1218 Joined: 11-October 01 From: LA Member No.: 267 |
QUOTE (quadamage @ Dec 24 2009, 08:43) QUOTE (menno @ Dec 24 2009, 23:46) QUOTE (quadamage @ Dec 24 2009, 07:05) QUOTE (elmar3rd @ Dec 24 2009, 19:39) Works fine here with foobar2000, Win7 Pro 32 bit, i5-750 Works with foobar2000, but not perfectly. I converted a 5 minute WAV file to m4a (96000Hz Stereo -q 1.0 ), played it with foobar2000, the file length is wrong ( 15:45 ). WMP, iTunes, Quicktime, MPC do not have the similar problem. You probably need to update foobar2000, because older versions had an issue with the timescale for the iTunes gapless data. I use the latest stable version v0.9.6.9, do I need to upgrade to v1.0 beta? Yeah, I think so. Although it seems that even that version it is not completely fixed yet (for your case it seems to be ok): For HE AAC files foobar2000 still seems to use the wrong timescale. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 04:53
Post
#29
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 512 Joined: 18-January 04 From: bethlehem.pa.us Member No.: 11318 |
Am I correct in assuming there were no major changes/optimizations to low-bitrate (~100kbps range) encoding in the LC profile?
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 06:50
Post
#30
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 309 Joined: 29-November 03 Member No.: 10090 |
newest version of nero aac works perfectly on my zune
 no more endless track bug.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 08:19
Post
#31
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 309 Joined: 29-November 03 Member No.: 10090 |
QUOTE (adlai @ Dec 24 2009, 21:50) newest version of nero aac works perfectly on my zune no more endless track bug.edit: nope, bug is back mysteriously. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 08:21
Post
#32
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 309 Joined: 29-November 03 Member No.: 10090 |
dang, this sucks. I was hoping that the time bug would be fixed...really wanted to use nero instead of LAME
|
|
|
|
 Dec 25 2009, 13:24
Post
#33
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 144 Joined: 5-May 02 Member No.: 1974 |
Yes, i can confirm the "Time Bug" with foobar2000. I really didn't noticed it (converted more than 1.000 tracks) until it was mentioned here
 .
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 14:44
Post
#34
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 144 Joined: 5-May 02 Member No.: 1974 |
QUOTE (elmar3rd @ Dec 25 2009, 13:24) Yes, i can confirm the "Time Bug" with foobar2000. I really didn't noticed it (converted more than 1.000 tracks) until it was mentioned here .... but can't reproduce it. I'll better stop claiming. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 17:59
Post
#35
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 69 Joined: 15-July 09 Member No.: 71500 |
any chance of a 64bit verion build for linux? otherwise still an amazing program!
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 18:10
Post
#36
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 52 Joined: 2-January 08 Member No.: 50051 |
well, I'm still using foobar2000 0.9.4.x (for UI reasons), and I have not had any "time display" issues between Nero and iTunes, so that seems to be a non-issue for older versions of foobar2000.
now that I've done a fair amount of testing, I have a quick question- I've noticed that the quality scale was re-mapped to where -q0.50 once again returns files at an average bitrate of ~175kbps (over my entire library), and what I'm wondering is whether there was extra tuning done to any specific integer values (i.e. if I'd notice the same behavior at -q0.5x or -q0.5xx as I would at -q0.5)... the average bitrates of my files don't seem to fluctuate nearly as much as they used to (for instance, with v. 1.3.3, old max ~ 201kbps vs. new max ~ 192kbps and old min ~ 75kbps vs. new min ~ 145kbps), and I was just curious why there was such a noticeable change. -------------------- Archive- FLAC (-v 8)
Portable- QuickTime AAC (True VBR/-q 77) |
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 20:24
Post
#37
|
|
 Group: Admin Posts: 3226 Joined: 30-September 01 Member No.: 84 |
QUOTE (menno @ Dec 24 2009, 18:50) Yeah, I think so. Although it seems that even that version it is not completely fixed yet (for your case it seems to be ok): For HE AAC files foobar2000 still seems to use the wrong timescale. If I understand this correctly, a non-SBR-aware decoder can't gaplessly decode your files?
-------------------- This job would be great if it wasn't for the users.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2009, 23:19
Post
#38
|
|
|
Nero MPEG4 developer Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 1218 Joined: 11-October 01 From: LA Member No.: 267 |
QUOTE (Peter @ Dec 25 2009, 11:24) QUOTE (menno @ Dec 24 2009, 18:50) Yeah, I think so. Although it seems that even that version it is not completely fixed yet (for your case it seems to be ok): For HE AAC files foobar2000 still seems to use the wrong timescale. If I understand this correctly, a non-SBR-aware decoder can't gaplessly decode your files? No, you have to use the LC AAC samplerate from the audio specific config, so SBR has no influence. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 26 2009, 05:02
Post
#39
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 309 Joined: 29-November 03 Member No.: 10090 |
the bug is on the zune side...I was hoping that one of the portable music players that the nero devs solved the compatibility problems with was the zune...there is an endless time bug with zune and aac files and it often locks up the player.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 26 2009, 05:20
Post
#40
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 3-January 07 From: Texas Member No.: 39241 |
Woo! Genres now show up on my cell phone (chocolate 3). That was a show stopper for me.
|
|
|
|
 Dec 26 2009, 11:15
Post
#41
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 26-December 09 Member No.: 76358 |
anyone knows-- what format it is better to feed to neroaacenc? pcm wav: 32 bit float, 32 bit int, 24 bit int or 16 bit int? --what it is using internally?
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 26 2009, 15:08
Post
#42
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 28 Joined: 22-September 07 Member No.: 47256 |
It seems that high sampling rate files have the file-length problems,
I did some quick tests, 8000 Hz ~ 48000 Hz(mono and stereo) is OK, 88200 Hz and 96000 have the bug. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 26 2009, 15:25
Post
#43
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 2019 Joined: 8-April 05 From: Cincinnati, OH Member No.: 21277 |
QUOTE (antman @ Dec 25 2009, 21:20) Woo! Genres now show up on my cell phone (chocolate 3). That was a show stopper for me. I had initial issues with my LG Chocolate Touch now showing track tag information until I copied the tracks off of the member card and onto its internal storage (a paltry 1GB). Kind of strange but that is one more device which Nero works with without issues. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 26 2009, 19:19
Post
#44
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 3-January 07 From: Texas Member No.: 39241 |
Hey Korn, have you tried editing the tags with another program yet? The LGs are picky as hell. Tags that Winamp created with CT AAC would work (occasionally) but if modified with Mp3tag, or others, they'd rewrite the genre field where the phone couldn't read it. What information wasn't showing for you? I've only had problems with the genre field.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 26 2009, 20:47
Post
#45
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 26-May 03 From: Berlin Member No.: 6815 |
Are iTunes Chapters now supported as well?
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 26 2009, 22:30
Post
#46
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2019 Joined: 8-April 05 From: Cincinnati, OH Member No.: 21277 |
QUOTE (antman @ Dec 26 2009, 11:19) Hey Korn, have you tried editing the tags with another program yet? The LGs are picky as hell. Tags that Winamp created with CT AAC would work (occasionally) but if modified with Mp3tag, or others, they'd rewrite the genre field where the phone couldn't read it. What information wasn't showing for you? I've only had problems with the genre field. iTunes written tags seem to be hit or miss. For example, I had some iTunes AAC files where the tags didn't show up, Nero 1.5.1 files where the tags showed up without issues, iTunes Plus purchases with tagging issues, and now I am having issues with some Nero 1.5.1 files. I know that this isn't Nero's fault but rather LG's software implementation for the portable music player (or whoever makes it). So I have yet to find a combination that was solid. I edited some tags with foobar2000 and they didn't show up either. The tags are very basic on my LG Chocolate Touch. Artist, album, and genre are about all I have found. This cellphone came in on the 24th of December (2 days ago) so I am still in the process of learning the ins and outs. AAC playback goes off without a hitch whether I am working with LC or HE files but tag support seems to be all over the place. I am not sure why it is having issues with iTunes standard tags as that seems to be the implementation that everyone else is using. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 07:02
Post
#47
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 3-January 07 From: Texas Member No.: 39241 |
That sucks. I know it's not Nero's fault. I had the chocolate 2 and that phone was just as picky with tags as this one. I always found wma tags had the fewest problems... yeah I know. At least I can upgrade my phone january 17th (woo!).
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 20:49
Post
#48
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 3-November 07 Member No.: 48438 |
Nero AAC Codec v1.5.1.0
Foobar 2000 v1.0 beta 5 Win XP SP3 Atlon XP 3200 (Barton)  FAIL! This post has been edited by CWP: Dec 27 2009, 20:51 |
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2009, 21:02
Post
#49
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 677 Joined: 4-May 08 Member No.: 53282 |
I only tried the new version once but I had the same kind of warning than CWP with Nero V1.5.1.0+F2K V0.9.6.9+Sempron 3000+(Barton)+Win XP SP3 ... I didn't have the time to retry as I was preparing Christmas.
-------------------- CDImage+CUE
Secure [Low/C2/AR(2)] Flac -4 |
|
|
|
|
Dec 28 2009, 03:32
Post
#50
|
|
|
Nero MPEG4 developer Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 1218 Joined: 11-October 01 From: LA Member No.: 267 |
QUOTE (CWP @ Dec 27 2009, 11:49) Nero AAC Codec v1.5.1.0 Foobar 2000 v1.0 beta 5 Win XP SP3 Atlon XP 3200 (Barton) FAIL! There appears to be an issue with CPU's that have SSE but no SSE2, we'll address it and release an update ASAP. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 16:27 |
