IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Float16 why ?
pompon
post Nov 18 2011, 05:25
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 2-January 08
Member No.: 50085



What is the interest to do a lossy flac ?
The goal of flac is compress and stay lossless.

AAC/MP3/Ogg are lossy ... why want one other lossy format ? If you listen lossy, you don't look for extreme quality anyway, it's more for practical reason.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kwanbis
post Nov 18 2011, 06:40
Post #2





Group: Developer (Donating)
Posts: 2353
Joined: 28-June 02
From: Argentina
Member No.: 2425



What are you talking about?


--------------------
MAREO: http://www.webearce.com.ar
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
hlloyge
post Nov 18 2011, 07:21
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 689
Joined: 10-January 06
From: Zagreb
Member No.: 27018



I am only guessing he is talking about lossy wav compressed as flac.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sauvage78
post Nov 18 2011, 08:38
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 677
Joined: 4-May 08
Member No.: 53282



QUOTE
The goal of flac is compress and stay lossless.


The goal of lossless codecs is to store data losslessly, no matter if the data is lossy or not. As a counter-exemple, all lossless video codecs are meant to store lossy data, mainly recording mpeg TV streams before re-encoding.

The thing that you don't understand is that what you call "lossless" is in fact lossy: all CD follow the CD standard & there are higher audio recording quality than CD.
So all CD are "lossy" compared to these higher recording possibilities of the same audio data.

You'd better think as "master" or "original" & flac is made to store data, not necessarily "masters".

QUOTE
you listen lossy, you don't look for extreme quality anyway


Seems that you don't understand lossy too ... you don't encode in lossy to willingfully listen to compression artefacts but in order to save space. So the holy grail of lossy is reaching audio transparency. Codecs like lossywav are much more resilient to killer samples than traditionnal lossy codecs, but is it worth it to double the bitrate for so few samples ? Only you can answer this question for yourself. So lossy audio data compressed with lossless codecs increase your choice & liberty.

Once you'll understand the limits of AAC/MP3/Ogg, you'll appreciate hybrid codecs better. Like it or not, they fill an audiophile niche market because their artefacts are fewer & softer if you're ready to pay the HDD space price.

This post has been edited by sauvage78: Nov 18 2011, 08:46


--------------------
CDImage+CUE
Secure [Low/C2/AR(2)]
Flac -4
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
db1989
post Nov 18 2011, 11:34
Post #5





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 5159
Joined: 23-June 06
Member No.: 32180



Float16 and lossyFLAC are not equivalent. In any case, thisíll fit better in Other Lossy Codecs with the rest of the threads about either.

In said previous threads, as well as on the Knowledgebase, there is a good deal of information about these processors and their rationales.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2Bdecided
post Nov 18 2011, 12:06
Post #6


ReplayGain developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 4945
Joined: 5-November 01
From: Yorkshire, UK
Member No.: 409



QUOTE (db1989 @ Nov 18 2011, 11:34) *
Float16 and lossyFLAC are not equivalent.
True. LossyWAV will happily keep all 24-bits of a 24-bit file perfectly intact if it thinks this is necessary.

It'll keep 10 bits or less if it thinks this is acceptable.

Cheers,
David.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st April 2014 - 08:56