WMA 192 kbps vs WMA VBR 240-355 kbps |
  |
WMA 192 kbps vs WMA VBR 240-355 kbps |
 Oct 18 2010, 21:19
Post
#26
|
|
 Group: Developer Posts: 3035 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183  |
WMA Q98 file was uploaded to the same thread.
|
 |
 
|
|
Oct 18 2010, 21:40
Post
#27
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 4163 Joined: 2-September 02 Member No.: 3264 |
QUOTE (pdq @ Oct 17 2010, 19:15)  QUOTE (saratoga @ Oct 17 2010, 13:32) WMA Standard supports 24 bit audio FWIW. No idea if the MS encoder is particularly good at it (probably makes no difference anyway). I have no idea what you mean by that, I mean the decoders can output 24 bit samples, same as WMA Pro. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2010, 21:52
Post
#28
|
|
 Group: Admin Posts: 4231 Joined: 15-December 02 Member No.: 4082 |
Which is rather silly, since the decoders themselves produce floating point samples internally, then quantize to 16 or 24 bit PCM in the output stage. Of course, that's less destructive to the signal than the actual encoding process was in the first place, so I guess there's really no point in making that distinction.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2010, 09:35
Post
#29
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 14-August 06 Member No.: 34027 |
QUOTE (lvqcl @ Oct 18 2010, 15:19) WMA Q98 file was uploaded to the same thread. That's whacky Lvqcl. So the issue is 9.2 vs 9. I can encode to WMA STD 9 on an XP box just fine, but the other XP box that is all updated encodes to 9.2 and munges the file.  Oh well, I use peak vbr 2-pass w/o issue, so no worries for me. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 13:41 |
