Verisign DNS Tragedy - * -> 64.94.110.11, Let's hack 64.94.110.11 -> www.goatse.cx |
- No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service
![]() ![]() |
Verisign DNS Tragedy - * -> 64.94.110.11, Let's hack 64.94.110.11 -> www.goatse.cx |
Sep 17 2003, 06:32
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Developer Posts: 717 Joined: 25-September 01 From: ... The Studio Member No.: 20 |
I'd be impressed to see someone hack 64.94.110.11 and redirect traffic to www.goatse.cx.
That would be worth a monetary donation for sure. =) On a more serious note: In the meantime, there are some good solutions for users looking to get NXDOMAIN responses. I'm currently using dnsmasq which has a new option, --bogus-nxdomain, which allows you specify, for example, 64.94.110.11 and workaround the issue as long as you keep the IP addresses used by the generic redirection up to date. A quick hack for Windows users is to add 64.94.110.11, sitefinder.verisign.com, and other IP such as 12.158.80.10, to 127.0.0.0 using the hosts file. I'm sure there are better solutions for Windows. dnsmasq should be compilable on Win32. There are BIND ports for Win32, and BIND released a similar patch to deal with this issue too. |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2003, 16:53
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
Erm... sorry, but I don't understand what's going on here.
What's the deal with 64.94.110.11? -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2003, 17:02
Post
#3
|
|
![]() LAME developer Group: Developer Posts: 2950 Joined: 1-October 01 From: Nanterre, France Member No.: 138 |
Verisign now own virtually any unregistered .com/.net domain name.
|
|
|
|
Sep 17 2003, 17:32
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 196 Joined: 24-December 02 Member No.: 4220 |
Any solution available for us Windows 2k/2k3 DNS Users? (Which are forced to use it because of active directory etc?)
-------------------- You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
- Abraham Lincoln |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2003, 18:20
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
QUOTE (Gabriel @ Sep 17 2003, 01:02 PM) Verisign now own virtually any unregistered .com/.net domain name. wow... -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2003, 22:02
Post
#6
|
|
|
dBpowerAMP developer Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2653 Joined: 24-March 02 Member No.: 1615 |
How is that any worse than Microsoft poping up - on MSN it cannot find the domain (for Internet Explorer Users)?
-------------------- Spoon http://www.dbpoweramp.com
|
|
|
|
Sep 18 2003, 04:24
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4231 Joined: 15-December 02 Member No.: 4082 |
This affects more than just web browsers.
Example: All those spam messages that come from bogus .com and .net addresses? All those domains are now valid, thanks to Verisign. Unless, of course, your DNS servers are patched against this nonsense. This post has been edited by kode54: Sep 18 2003, 04:26 |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2003, 04:43
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 494 Joined: 16-April 03 From: Pittsburgh, PA Member No.: 5997 |
Any information on HOW that happened? An article link or something?
|
|
|
|
Sep 18 2003, 05:48
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 53 Joined: 18-January 03 Member No.: 4621 |
Check out this news at SlashDot
And some discussion at NANOG IMO, Verisign should be banned on managing TLD. They should be forced to hand over their administration of the root ns to a competent not-for-profit organization. -------------------- -- Floydian Slip
|
|
|
|
Sep 18 2003, 07:39
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 3268 Joined: 26-July 02 From: princegeorge.ca Member No.: 2796 |
QUOTE (TrNSZ @ Sep 16 2003, 09:32 PM) I'd be impressed to see someone hack 64.94.110.11 and redirect traffic to www.goatse.cx. goatse.cx? Who links to goatse.cx these days? Today's real trolls link to tubgirl.comtubgirl.com. Note: Do not click that link if you do not want to be disgusted. Seriously. Edit: Wow... HA filters out tubgirl links. Cool. This post has been edited by Canar: Sep 18 2003, 07:41 -------------------- (atrix|(fb2k->e-mu 0404 usb|audio 8 dj))->hd280|jvc ha-fx35-b
|
|
|
|
Sep 18 2003, 08:13
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 933 Joined: 3-June 02 From: USA Member No.: 2204 |
QUOTE (rjamorim @ Sep 17 2003, 09:53 AM) Erm... sorry, but I don't understand what's going on here. What's the deal with 64.94.110.11? I was thinking the same thing when I read it yesterday. So, could this be the root of DNS problems? I've had some weird crap happening with my ISP with the DNS server magically going down everyday, and websites not being responsive or not loading. -------------------- Complexity of incoherent design.
|
|
|
|
Sep 18 2003, 12:55
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 371 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 45 |
I found this explanatory rant to be pretty informative for me.
http://www.haque.net/verisign_dns_rant.php [edit] Especially the part about their logging of mistyped URL's containing personal info was interesting [/edit] This post has been edited by YinYang: Sep 18 2003, 12:57 |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2003, 14:28
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 715 Joined: 22-April 03 From: /dev/null Member No.: 6130 |
Seems like my ISP has already taken care of this brain damage.
/EDIT\ Spoken too soon - got my DNS cache record. \EDIT/ This post has been edited by AstralStorm: Sep 18 2003, 14:32 -------------------- ruxvilti'a
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 21:43 |