[TOS #5, DOUBLE POST] From: Any reasons NOT to use FLAC?, From Topic ID: 97854 |
Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules - No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service
  |
[TOS #5, DOUBLE POST] From: Any reasons NOT to use FLAC?, From Topic ID: 97854 |
 Dec 29 2012, 00:23
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 28-December 12 Member No.: 105445  |
A group of dedicated FLAC users, members of a new organization based in Northern California and named the Full Fidelity Music Initiative, will soon release a proposed standard for FLAC tags for comment and refinement. The format for metadata is the same as the original Vorbis Comments for FLAC (FIELDNAME=Value) but some of the original tags are better defined/refined and essential others are added.
We hope to obtain timely, constructive input so that the proposal can be released for general use. Clearly, a well-documented metadata standard is essential for any digitally-download-only file format. Look for more information from us by the end of March if all goes well. -d2b- |
 |
 
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 05:20 |
