LAME 3.99 is out, 2012-02-28: version 3.99.5 has been released |
![]() ![]() |
LAME 3.99 is out, 2012-02-28: version 3.99.5 has been released |
Dec 4 2011, 10:28
Post
#276
|
|
![]() LAME developer Group: Developer Posts: 761 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 5 |
@Jebus
Albert Faber originally wrote the code for the DLL for his CDex project. For new programs, do use the libmp3lame.dll instead. Do you want to replace RG by r128 ? |
|
|
|
Dec 5 2011, 18:41
Post
#277
|
|
|
Group: Developer Posts: 1289 Joined: 17-March 03 From: Calgary, AB Member No.: 5541 |
ah, I didn't realize - thought it was the preferred public API. I'm using my own native C# RG implementation; I may also implement r128 at a later date.
Could someone add libmp3lame.dll be to the Rarewares Lame bundles? I need both 32-bit and 64-bit versions, and don't have access to ICL. It would be muchly appreciated! This post has been edited by db1989: Dec 5 2011, 20:13
Reason for edit: removing unnecessary full quote
|
|
|
|
Dec 5 2011, 19:00
Post
#278
|
|
![]() xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
Will do, over the next 24 hours.
This post has been edited by db1989: Dec 5 2011, 20:13
Reason for edit: "
-------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
Dec 5 2011, 20:55
Post
#279
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 318 Joined: 26-November 04 Member No.: 18345 |
So, what's the verdict? Is 3.99.3 going to be it for a while? There have been a slew of releases in very short order. Could we see a 3.99.4 soon to fix more bugs? I'm hesitant to encode anything with 3.99.3 after the missteps with 3.99 and 3.99.1 and 3.99.2.
|
|
|
|
Dec 5 2011, 21:15
Post
#280
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2257 Joined: 9-October 05 From: Dormagen, Germany Member No.: 25015 |
You don't have to re-encode when a new subversion comes out. As far as I can see the new subversion were only a.bout special tagging issues.
This post has been edited by halb27: Dec 5 2011, 21:19 -------------------- lame3100i -V0.5+ --adbr_short 480
|
|
|
|
Dec 6 2011, 04:25
Post
#281
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 168 Joined: 13-September 05 From: Baltimore Member No.: 24445 |
Robert and Mr. Odd:
I'm using mp3gain v1.25 When I did run "check integrity," it told me that there were minor problems and that there were multiple id3v2 tags encountered. So I checked my EAC settings. I had LAME set up to tag the file: -V2 --add-id3v2 --pad-id3v2 --ta "%artist%" --tl "%albumtitle%" --tt "%title%" --tn "%tracknr%" --tg "%genre%" --ty "%year%" %source% %dest% And also on the EAC compression tab I had 'Add ID3 tag' checked as well. So I think that there were actually two sets of tags being written. If I unchecked the box and tested, I was still getting id3v2 tags, but no errors in foobar or in mp3gain. So I think the problem is solved for me. I'm still curious as to why this caused problems in 3.99 but not in 3.98? |
|
|
|
Dec 6 2011, 15:35
Post
#282
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 37 Joined: 16-November 11 Member No.: 95199 |
|
|
|
|
Dec 6 2011, 15:43
Post
#283
|
|
![]() xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
..... Could someone add libmp3lame.dll be to the Rarewares Lame bundles? I need both 32-bit and 64-bit versions, and don't have access to ICL. It would be muchly appreciated! Compiles of the dll with exports and libs (ICL 12.1), x86 and x64, now at Rarewares on the lame-libs page. -------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
Dec 6 2011, 16:05
Post
#284
|
|
![]() LAME developer Group: Developer Posts: 761 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 5 |
|
|
|
|
Dec 6 2011, 16:19
Post
#285
|
|
|
Group: Developer Posts: 1289 Joined: 17-March 03 From: Calgary, AB Member No.: 5541 |
..... Could someone add libmp3lame.dll be to the Rarewares Lame bundles? I need both 32-bit and 64-bit versions, and don't have access to ICL. It would be muchly appreciated! Compiles of the dll with exports and libs (ICL 12.1), x86 and x64, now at Rarewares on the lame-libs page. Thanks so much - you rule! This post has been edited by Jebus: Dec 6 2011, 16:19 |
|
|
|
Dec 7 2011, 19:53
Post
#286
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 178 Joined: 16-April 07 Member No.: 42593 |
The program must protect itself from idiots. Or, security holes would be user errors too. It is an EAC bug, because it should check if the file contains the tag already before writing its own. First of all, the program is listed as a beta version. Second, you have a choice of beginner mode or advanced mode. Beginner is default. Do you think it needs a stupid mode? |
|
|
|
Dec 8 2011, 04:38
Post
#287
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 168 Joined: 13-September 05 From: Baltimore Member No.: 24445 |
Whether or not it was idiotic of me to leave the 'write id3 tag' box checked, I still am curious as to why it's only an issue using 3.99, and something I've never encountered with all of the other versions of LAME I've used (back to 3.96.1)...
Regardless, it's no longer an issue for me, and I learned a bit more about EAC in the process. |
|
|
|
Dec 8 2011, 22:45
Post
#288
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 178 Joined: 16-April 07 Member No.: 42593 |
|
|
|
|
Dec 8 2011, 23:31
Post
#289
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 9264 Joined: 1-April 04 Member No.: 13167 |
I split away the useless off-topic argument but wanted to keep zipr's post since it relates back to differences between the current version of Lame and previous versions. Your post was kept in order to preserve some context and it links back to the binned side-discussion. Sorry for any confusion. -------------------- Everything sounds the same until it is proven otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2011, 06:03
Post
#290
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 23-December 01 Member No.: 732 |
Compiles of the dll with exports and libs (ICL 12.1), x86 and x64, now at Rarewares on the lame-libs page. If that's not too much trouble, could you please add a modified lame_enc.dll to use .ini settings as well? Thanks. This post has been edited by dxiv: Dec 13 2011, 06:04 |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2011, 10:08
Post
#291
|
|
![]() LAME developer Group: Developer Posts: 761 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 5 |
I still am curious as to why it's only an issue using 3.99, and something I've never encountered with all of the other versions of LAME I've used (back to 3.96.1)... As of v3.99, LAME writes unicode tags by default (and when compiled with unicode support). The byte order marker (BOM) look like sync bits. Seeing your location, you eventually can live with Latin-1 text encoding, add --id3v2-latin1 in front of the other tagging options to avoid unicode tags. |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2011, 11:00
Post
#292
|
|
![]() xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
Compiles of the dll with exports and libs (ICL 12.1), x86 and x64, now at Rarewares on the lame-libs page. If that's not too much trouble, could you please add a modified lame_enc.dll to use .ini settings as well? Thanks. Yes, sorry, I meant to look at these variations but they slipped my mind! -------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2011, 17:10
Post
#293
|
|
![]() xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
... If that's not too much trouble, could you please add a modified lame_enc.dll to use .ini settings as well? Thanks. Available at Rarewares now in the same place as before. -------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2011, 21:14
Post
#294
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 37 Joined: 16-November 11 Member No.: 95199 |
... If that's not too much trouble, could you please add a modified lame_enc.dll to use .ini settings as well? Thanks. Available at Rarewares now in the same place as before. Would ini file settings have a precedence over other settings? I do not like Winamps mp3 encoder set up that is very outdated. Can I use this to overwrite Winamp plugin? |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2011, 22:19
Post
#295
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4345 Joined: 23-June 06 Member No.: 32180 |
Yes, that is basically the entire purpose of that particular DLL.
Edit: Well, sort of This dll uses an '.ini' file to set up the encoder. This is designed for use with applications that use the dll but do not provide full preset support.
This post has been edited by db1989: Dec 14 2011, 22:23 |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2011, 23:17
Post
#296
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 23-December 01 Member No.: 732 |
|
|
|
|
Dec 15 2011, 00:29
Post
#297
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 37 Joined: 16-November 11 Member No.: 95199 |
Yes, that is basically the entire purpose of that particular DLL. Edit: Well, sort of QUOTE ( [url="http://www.rarewares.org/mp3-lame-libraries.php") http://www.rarewares.org/mp3-lame-libraries.php[/url] ]This dll uses an '.ini' file to set up the encoder. This is designed for use with applications that use the dll but do not provide full preset support. Sort of the other way around This implies that the ini file has lower precedence, but this is not clear or explicit. |
|
|
|
Dec 15 2011, 10:57
Post
#298
|
|
![]() xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
... Sort of the other way around This implies that the ini file has lower precedence, but this is not clear or explicit. The code for the dll has been modified so that it ignores all parameters from the 'host' application that are specified in the .ini file. -------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
Dec 15 2011, 15:49
Post
#299
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 2983 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183 |
I cannot see why such DLL is better for Winamp users.
|
|
|
|
Dec 15 2011, 16:39
Post
#300
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 13 Joined: 11-April 11 Member No.: 89722 |
likewise.
yes the Winamp mp3 encoder settings dialog isn't great / needs to be updated to whatever the suggested guidelines are now, but it otherwise works. -daz |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 16:51 |