Info about mpc encoder version needed, can't recognize correct in foobar |
![]() ![]() |
Info about mpc encoder version needed, can't recognize correct in foobar |
Feb 25 2003, 10:59
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 20-November 02 From: Germany Member No.: 3824 |
Hi,
i try to sort all my audio files by quality and need correct information abaout the used encoder. For mp3 files does encspot a good job (i know its only a guess), ogg files can be recognized by encoder library date, and for mpc i take a look at the foobar file information screen. i know if the version number of the mpc encoder shows 2 digits after the dot, its a beta release. 2 digits and a letter is alpha. only 1 digit is a final version. (i know the beta versions are as good as final) But my problem is to allocate older version of mpc like v1.7.9 or 0.9 and others. what is "Buschmann 1.7.0...9, Klemm 0.90...1.05" ? can anyone tell me if this is a guess between the versions 0.90 and 1.05 or 1.7.0 to 1.7.0.9? i want to comprehend the meaning of a them. is there a safe way to recognize the encoder version? does exist a tool to display version numbers by scaning a whole directory of mpcs, like encspot? and sorry for my stupid english. This post has been edited by -Nepomuk-: Feb 25 2003, 11:04 |
|
|
|
Feb 25 2003, 12:21
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2041 Joined: 19-October 01 From: Finland Member No.: 322 |
QUOTE (Nepomuk- @ Feb 25 2003 - 11:59 AM) i know if the version number of the mpc encoder shows 2 digits after the dot, its a beta release. 2 digits and a letter is alpha. only 1 digit is a final version. (i know the beta versions are as good as final) Both beta and alpha have two digits after the dot but beta uses even numbers and alpha odd. QUOTE what is "Buschmann 1.7.0...9, Klemm 0.90...1.05" ? can anyone tell me if this is a guess between the versions 0.90 and 1.05 or 1.7.0 to 1.7.0.9? i want to comprehend the meaning of a them. is there a safe way to recognize the encoder version? Mppenc 1.06 was first one to use version number in the header, all older versions have zero on place of that. There's no way to know encoder version for those files if you can't recompress original file again to test it. QUOTE does exist a tool to display version numbers by scaning a whole directory of mpcs, like encspot? I don't know graphical tools, but Tag with parameters "--hidetags *.mpc" is quite effective. |
|
|
|
Feb 25 2003, 14:04
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 20-November 02 From: Germany Member No.: 3824 |
QUOTE (Case @ Feb 25 2003 - 03:21 AM) QUOTE (Nepomuk- @ Feb 25 2003 - 11:59 AM) i know if the version number of the mpc encoder shows 2 digits after the dot, its a beta release. 2 digits and a letter is alpha. only 1 digit is a final version. (i know the beta versions are as good as final) Both beta and alpha have two digits after the dot but beta uses even numbers and alpha odd. QUOTE what is "Buschmann 1.7.0...9, Klemm 0.90...1.05" ? can anyone tell me if this is a guess between the versions 0.90 and 1.05 or 1.7.0 to 1.7.0.9? i want to comprehend the meaning of a them. is there a safe way to recognize the encoder version? Mppenc 1.06 was first one to use version number in the header, all older versions have zero on place of that. There's no way to know encoder version for those files if you can't recompress original file again to test it. QUOTE does exist a tool to display version numbers by scaning a whole directory of mpcs, like encspot? I don't know graphical tools, but Tag with parameters "--hidetags *.mpc" is quite effective. Thank you |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 19:56 |