IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Nero 7.2 Released, Nero Releases Huge Update of its Flagship Product
SirGrey
post May 3 2006, 08:30
Post #126





Group: Members
Posts: 241
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 11863



>>Most of gurus here will be satisfied if the 'surprise' happens to be standalone command line aac encoder
Sure cool.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DARcode
post May 3 2006, 08:37
Post #127





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 665
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Italy
Member No.: 18968



A free stand-alone encoder is the most likely scenario IMO, as Ahead's major competition has already gone that way.

And yes: donating to HA is always good no matter what tongue.gif .


--------------------
WavPack 4.60.1 -hx6b4cm/qaac 2.15 -V 100
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
riggits
post May 3 2006, 10:09
Post #128





Group: Members
Posts: 148
Joined: 26-December 03
Member No.: 10708



I've got even better news: Nero 7 Lite!
Now we can finally enjoy the encoder without 800MB of crap floating around. I went from 800MB to around 40MB just by using this app & a new install of Windows to get all the junk out.
540MB in the temp folder + 220MB of unwanted NeroScout etc + 40MB of actual burning program was my former installation, now it's much faster & cleaner. Lite is the ONLY way to go.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Garf
post May 3 2006, 10:32
Post #129


Server Admin


Group: Admin
Posts: 4808
Joined: 24-September 01
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (ozmosis82 @ May 3 2006, 01:08 AM) *
I have to admit, I'm a smidge hesitant when it comes to using the new AAC encoder. Just watching the bitrate barely change concerns me. Granted, I haven't performed any ABXes myself. It just seems bizarre that the bitrate doesn't really jump anymore than +/- 10kbps. Is it really VBR?


Yes.

Bitrate depends on the playback application. The more it averages, the less "flex" you will see.

QUOTE
I used to use the "Extreme" profile with the old encoder. With the new slider I tend to have it at 192kbps. I tried moving the slider up to 200kbps and the filesizes were EXACTLY the same as the ones encoded with the slider at 192kbps.


Please read the thread you are replying to, it should become clear why that happens. (Basically, increasing quality/bitrate slider in the GUI has a minimal effect at high bitrates/quality levels. This behaviour is already changed for the next version.)

This post has been edited by Garf: May 3 2006, 10:44
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
zombiewerewolf
post May 3 2006, 11:01
Post #130





Group: Members
Posts: 119
Joined: 27-January 03
From: Perth, AU
Member No.: 4755



QUOTE (riggits @ May 3 2006, 05:09 PM) *
I've got even better news: Nero 7 Lite!
Now we can finally enjoy the encoder without 800MB of crap floating around. I went from 800MB to around 40MB just by using this app & a new install of Windows to get all the junk out.
540MB in the temp folder + 220MB of unwanted NeroScout etc + 40MB of actual burning program was my former installation, now it's much faster & cleaner. Lite is the ONLY way to go.

Wow! This is awesome! shock1.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
CobraX
post May 3 2006, 13:33
Post #131





Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 10-April 02
Member No.: 1741



QUOTE (riggits @ May 3 2006, 10:09 AM) *
I've got even better news: Nero 7 Lite!
Now we can finally enjoy the encoder without 800MB of crap floating around. I went from 800MB to around 40MB just by using this app & a new install of Windows to get all the junk out.
540MB in the temp folder + 220MB of unwanted NeroScout etc + 40MB of actual burning program was my former installation, now it's much faster & cleaner. Lite is the ONLY way to go.


Is that the surprise? I was hoping for a free standalone nero aac encoder.
*disappointed*
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jan S.
post May 3 2006, 13:35
Post #132





Group: Admin
Posts: 2530
Joined: 26-September 01
From: Denmark
Member No.: 21



QUOTE (CobraX @ May 3 2006, 02:33 PM) *
QUOTE (riggits @ May 3 2006, 10:09 AM) *

I've got even better news: Nero 7 Lite!
Now we can finally enjoy the encoder without 800MB of crap floating around. I went from 800MB to around 40MB just by using this app & a new install of Windows to get all the junk out.
540MB in the temp folder + 220MB of unwanted NeroScout etc + 40MB of actual burning program was my former installation, now it's much faster & cleaner. Lite is the ONLY way to go.


Is that the surprise? I was hoping for a free standalone nero aac encoder.
*disappointed*
This is not from Nero and is probably not legal.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ozmosis82
post May 3 2006, 13:48
Post #133





Group: Members
Posts: 204
Joined: 26-March 06
From: Edmonton, Canada
Member No.: 28860



QUOTE
QUOTE
I used to use the "Extreme" profile with the old encoder. With the new slider I tend to have it at 192kbps. I tried moving the slider up to 200kbps and the filesizes were EXACTLY the same as the ones encoded with the slider at 192kbps.


Please read the thread you are replying to, it should become clear why that happens. (Basically, increasing quality/bitrate slider in the GUI has a minimal effect at high bitrates/quality levels. This behaviour is already changed for the next version.)


Oh, I read that part of the thread. I was just under the impression that it only started happening past the 280/320kbps range. 189kbps for a setting around 200kbps seems moderately reasonable to me. However 261kbps for 360kbps and 266kbps for 400kbps seem to be a bit ridiculous. Good to know it's been fixed in the new version though (remember reading that as well, two replies down... I do pay attention).

Well, it's Wednesday, so today's "the latest" by which the surprise should be revealed to us. Dare I say that I'll be checking back frequently over the next 24 hours?

This post has been edited by ozmosis82: May 3 2006, 14:26
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kwanbis
post May 3 2006, 14:00
Post #134





Group: Developer (Donating)
Posts: 2332
Joined: 28-June 02
From: Argentina
Member No.: 2425



QUOTE (Jan S. @ May 3 2006, 12:35 PM) *
This is not from Nero and is probably not legal.

Not from Nero.
Not legal.

But it shows:

1) what people thinks about bloat (can you say nlite, 98lite, etc?)
2) people would take the issue in they own hands if nero doesn't do anything about it.


--------------------
MAREO: http://www.webearce.com.ar
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kornchild2002
post May 3 2006, 18:42
Post #135





Group: Members
Posts: 2019
Joined: 8-April 05
From: Cincinnati, OH
Member No.: 21277



Well, it has been 8 days since the update, any news on that "surprise" coming?

Just a note, I have also downloaded the latest version of Nero that they released only a few days (or maybe day) after the 25th of April. I am still having the same video problems when using the iPod AVC profile in Nero Recode 2 to encode some unencrypted DVD's.

I still can't select the option to save CD's to Nero Digital Files as well, I must go through the other option to rip CD's then select Nero's AAC encoder as an option. Kinda frustrating.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kwanbis
post May 3 2006, 18:58
Post #136





Group: Developer (Donating)
Posts: 2332
Joined: 28-June 02
From: Argentina
Member No.: 2425



QUOTE (kornchild2002 @ May 3 2006, 05:42 PM) *
Just a note, I have also downloaded the latest version of Nero that they released only a few days (or maybe day) after the 25th of April. I am still having the same video problems when using the iPod AVC profile in Nero Recode 2 to encode some unencrypted DVD's.

maybe that is why we haven't seen the surprise yet.


--------------------
MAREO: http://www.webearce.com.ar
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sven_Bent
post May 3 2006, 19:29
Post #137





Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 15-December 01
From: Denmark
Member No.: 655



2pass and stand alone Command encoer would be nice.

then i could move from .ogm to .mp4 for my movies


--------------------
Sven Bent - Denmark
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
riggits
post May 3 2006, 20:06
Post #138





Group: Members
Posts: 148
Joined: 26-December 03
Member No.: 10708



QUOTE (kwanbis @ May 3 2006, 05:00 AM) *
QUOTE (Jan S. @ May 3 2006, 12:35 PM) *

This is not from Nero and is probably not legal.

Not from Nero.
Not legal.

But it shows:

1) what people thinks about bloat (can you say nlite, 98lite, etc?)
2) people would take the issue in they own hands if nero doesn't do anything about it.


It's legal in my country & it's the free demo version of Nero 7. The only difference between Lite & official is that this installer is a lot more honest than the official one. If you don't want a pseudo-database sneakily installed behind your back then you won't be forced to suffer it.

Sadly the AAC encoder isn't working with MeGUI. Anybody have a workaround?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Garf
post May 3 2006, 20:10
Post #139


Server Admin


Group: Admin
Posts: 4808
Joined: 24-September 01
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (riggits @ May 3 2006, 09:06 PM) *
QUOTE (kwanbis @ May 3 2006, 05:00 AM) *

QUOTE (Jan S. @ May 3 2006, 12:35 PM) *

This is not from Nero and is probably not legal.

Not from Nero.
Not legal.

But it shows:

1) what people thinks about bloat (can you say nlite, 98lite, etc?)
2) people would take the issue in they own hands if nero doesn't do anything about it.


It's legal in my country


I wonder what country you live in that doesn't have copyrights.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
CobraX
post May 3 2006, 21:00
Post #140





Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 10-April 02
Member No.: 1741



Developers and deadlines

Will the "surprise" be ready before midnight as stated by Ivan Dimkovic?

QUOTE (Ivan Dimkovic)
Hi,
There are no changes in 7.2.0.3b with regards to AAC encoder. As far as MP3 is in question I will check this next week (Tuesday) and come back to you.

Release date for the 'surprise' is most likely Tuesday or Wednesday latest.


Will developers keep their promises and hang on to their deadline schedule?

You can see it next week on another episode of HydrogenAudio TV. tongue.gif;)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Garf
post May 3 2006, 21:09
Post #141


Server Admin


Group: Admin
Posts: 4808
Joined: 24-September 01
Member No.: 13



Don't blame the developers, we finished our part last week already smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
.halverhahn
post May 3 2006, 21:18
Post #142





Group: Members
Posts: 247
Joined: 4-August 03
Member No.: 8168



QUOTE (CobraX @ May 3 2006, 10:00 PM) *
Developers and deadlines

Will the "surprise" be ready before midnight as stated by Ivan Dimkovic?
Will developers keep their promises and hang on to their deadline schedule?

Calm down, take a deep breath and relax. You'll get your new toy. wink.gif


--------------------
.halverhahn
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
halb27
post May 3 2006, 21:23
Post #143





Group: Members
Posts: 2257
Joined: 9-October 05
From: Dormagen, Germany
Member No.: 25015



In case we can't get the surprise today can we learn more details about what it is as we've been heard so interesting things and had expected to have it available right now?


--------------------
lame3100i -V0.5+ --adbr_short 480
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
freak393
post May 3 2006, 21:33
Post #144





Group: Members
Posts: 31
Joined: 17-February 06
From: Germany
Member No.: 27813



kinda feels like chrsitmas now doesn't it? biggrin.gif

Just hope it's coming out before the weekend...

I hate waiting for christmas (well not realy)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ivan Dimkovic
post May 3 2006, 21:44
Post #145


Nero MPEG4 developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 1466
Joined: 22-September 01
Member No.: 8



QUOTE
Will developers keep their promises and hang on to their deadline schedule?


To release a product there is much more that needs to be done than just development - sometimes, it is hard to predict exact ETAs of these tasks especially in a dynamic software industry enviroment.

That said, I am really hoping the solution will be out soon - it is basically finished and there are just a few remaining tasks that are not of development nature - and I really expect them to be completed asap.

QUOTE
In case we can't get the surprise today can we learn more details about what it is as we've been heard so interesting things and had expected to have it available right now?


I can only say it has lots of things in common to one idea people speculated here wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
IgorC
post May 3 2006, 21:45
Post #146





Group: Members
Posts: 1314
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Argentina, Bs As
Member No.: 18803



QUOTE (Garf @ May 3 2006, 12:09 PM) *
Don't blame the developers, we finished our part last week already smile.gif


I don't want to be annoyed but encoder included in the last 7.2 package has only cbr mode and it hasn't 48 kbits/s bitrate only 50 kbits/s.

The conditions for including of Nero beta 4.9.9.5/6 to 48 AAC+ test were that during 3 months AAC new encoder 48 kbit/s VBR. will be included.

But a few days doesn't make a big difference.
It's already planned that there will be updated encoder shortly. If it will be today ( 3d or 4th of may) you will be very precise. Exactly 90 days (3 months) smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Garf
post May 3 2006, 21:48
Post #147


Server Admin


Group: Admin
Posts: 4808
Joined: 24-September 01
Member No.: 13



?!?! The encoder is Nero 7.2 should be VBR. That's exactly why people have problems to get it above 260kbps...
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
IgorC
post May 3 2006, 21:50
Post #148





Group: Members
Posts: 1314
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Argentina, Bs As
Member No.: 18803



QUOTE (Garf @ May 3 2006, 12:48 PM) *
?!?! The encoder is Nero 7.2 should be VBR. That's exactly why people have problems to get it above 260kbps...


Hm, Sorry I'm wrong. I just see that bitrate hasn't a big varience during playback by foobar 0.9.1. It's certainly VBR.

But there is still no 48 kbit/s.

This post has been edited by IgorC: May 3 2006, 22:00
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
vlada
post May 4 2006, 05:47
Post #149





Group: Members
Posts: 401
Joined: 7-January 04
Member No.: 11023



QUOTE (kwanbis @ May 3 2006, 07:58 PM) *
QUOTE (kornchild2002 @ May 3 2006, 05:42 PM) *

Just a note, I have also downloaded the latest version of Nero that they released only a few days (or maybe day) after the 25th of April. I am still having the same video problems when using the iPod AVC profile in Nero Recode 2 to encode some unencrypted DVD's.

maybe that is why we haven't seen the surprise yet.


You can switch to MP4 using MeGUI and x264 codec. You can also convert losslesly you OGM to MP4 or MKV. I see no use in OGM today, the format is not developed anymore for a long time and there is no support for it.

What I would really like to see, is Nero asking me what filters I want to have installed. Why puts Nero in my system over 50 DirectShow filters which I don't want a which are often causing problems? For example MP4 parser/splitter doesen't output TTXT subtitles (which are part of MPEG-4 standard). MPEG-4 ASP decoder has problems with a lot of AVIs and so on. That's why I want to use my own filters.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
extesy
post May 5 2006, 16:56
Post #150





Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 11-January 03
From: Russian Federation
Member No.: 4518



So no "surprise" this week?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 12:52