LAME 3.99 is out, 2012-02-28: version 3.99.5 has been released Options

[bbrabant]

What error message do you get, if any?

Immediately after running lame a windows dialog box comes up "Application Failure lame.exe 3.99.2.4 in lame.exe 3.99.2.4 at offset 0001afa6"

[biomega]

Thanks for the new Lame compiles but on my windows xp pc (32bit) I am unable to run these compiles. I had no problem running the previous compiles of Lame.

Same problem here. NO error messages. Nothings happens (in the command-line window it simply jumps to a new line).

I've only encountered a similar behavior with programs that require a CPU with SSE2 support. (using an AthlonXP without SSE2)
Could that may be the case for this new release (LAME 3.99.4)?

This post has been edited by biomega: Jan 28 2012, 15:34

[Alex B]

I've only encountered a similar behavior with programs that require a CPU with SSE2 support. (using an AthlonXP without SSE2)
Could that may be the case for this new release (LAME 3.99.4)?

You may be right. I just tried AMD Athlon XP 3200+ on Win 7 (32-bit). LAME 3.99.4 did not work when using the same foobar2000 settings that work fine with 3.99.3.

foobar2000 reported:

Conversion failed: The encoder has terminated prematurely with code -1073741795 (0xC000001D); please re-check parameters

This post has been edited by Alex B: Jan 28 2012, 17:42

[bbrabant]

I've only encountered a similar behavior with programs that require a CPU with SSE2 support. (using an AthlonXP without SSE2)

I am using a AMD Athlon XP 2200 also without SSE2 support

[R3D]

Hey, I've got a question and I hope you can help me. (I hope it's the right topic)

I would like to convert my CD's new. For the last nearly 2 years I used Rarewares Lame bundle 3.98.4 64-Bit all the time. But deleted it by mistake.
The problem is that I can't find the Rarewares 3.98.4 64-Bit version on their website anymore. Just the 32-Bit version of 3.98.4.

And I don't know if I can trust Lame 3.99.4 because I read about artifacts.


So, my question is... does someone know where I can find the Rarewares 64-Bit version of Lame 3.98.4?

Thanks.

[john33]

Here you go:

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jfe1205/LAME/lame3.98.4-64.zip

This post has been edited by db1989: Feb 3 2012, 20:47

Reason for edit: removing pointless full quote of above post

[R3D]

Thx for your quick help!

This post has been edited by db1989: Feb 3 2012, 20:47

Reason for edit: as above

[db1989]

Split: LAME: different compilers producing significantly different bitstreams

[Steve Forte Rio]

Hi all. I wonder when we will see regular (non-test) LAME 3.99.5 32- and 64-bit compiles at RareWares?

[ZinCh]

LAME 3.99.5 final version released today ( February 28 2012 )

[john33]

A full set of 3.99.5 compiles is now at Rarewares.

For anyone who may have used the most recent test compile; there are no code changes in the release version so there is no need to re-encode anything.

[eahm]

Good birthday present thank you

This post has been edited by eahm: Feb 29 2012, 01:18

[apodtele]

I run Windows 7 64-bit, however...

32-bit Winamp uses lame_enc.dll. Do I have to take 32-bit build?
32-bit foobar2000 uses lame.exe. Can I take 64-bit build?

See how confused I am?

Unfortunately, those players do not come in 64-bit form to bring me peace.

[Jebus]

Appologies and thanks in advance, because I know this increases the work for you every time a new release is made, but any chance we could get those libmp3lame downloads updated to the latest as well?

[john33]

Appologies and thanks in advance, because I know this increases the work for you every time a new release is made, but any chance we could get those libmp3lame downloads updated to the latest as well?

Done.

[DoctorO]

32-bit Winamp uses lame_enc.dll. Do I have to take 32-bit build?

you need to use the 32-bit compile of lame_enc.dll as Winamp cannot load / use the 64-bit version.

-daz

[yakuman]

32-bit foobar2000 uses lame.exe. Can I take 64-bit build?

See how confused I am?

Unfortunately, those players do not come in 64-bit form to bring me peace.

I've been there too. foobar2000 can encode with 64-bit LAME. This is what I've been doing ever since I recently discovered the 64-bit version. I don't know if there's any quality or size difference in the result of MP3 files, though.

This post has been edited by yakuman: Mar 2 2012, 00:30

[Fishman0919]

I'm getting an error when trying to compile with "nmake -f Makefile.MSVC MSVCVER=8.0 PREC=DOUBLE"

CODE

Setting environment for using Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 x86 tools.

C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC>cd lame

C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\lame>nmake -f Makefile.MSVC MSV
CVER=8.0 PREC=DOUBLE

Microsoft ® Program Maintenance Utility Version 10.00.30319.01
Copyright © Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
building LAME featuring RH
+ ASM
+ MMX
+ using MSVC 8.0 32-Bit Compiler
+ optimizing for Pentium II/III
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pass GTK=YES to build the frame analyzer. (requires installed GTK)


--- LAME MP3 ENCODING LIBRARY UPTODATE ---


--- HIP DECODING LIBRARY UPTODATE ---


--=* .\output\libmp3lame-static.lib ready *=--


--- COMMON FRONTEND STUFF UPTODATE ---

Microsoft ® Windows ® Resource Compiler Version 6.1.7600.16385
Copyright © Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

libmp3lame-static.lib(psymodel.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
_static_assert_tab_mask_add_delta
.\output\lame.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\BI
N\link.EXE"' : return code '0x460'
Stop.

C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\VC\lame>

This post has been edited by db1989: Mar 2 2012, 17:44

Reason for edit: Please enclose large items in [codebox] rather than [code] tags.

[robert]

You'll have to remove the /GL compiler option in Makefile.MSVC line 209.
The _static_assert_tab_mask_add_delta symbol is there to do some compile-time assertions, there should be no such symbol actually compiled into the object files. I don't know, why the linker thinks it should find such a thing, when using /GL for whole program optimization.

some variations on static asserts

[ZinCh]

Can someone post LAME 3.99.5 builds using MS VC 11 (beta) ?

[Fishman0919]

You'll have to remove the /GL compiler option in Makefile.MSVC line 209.
The _static_assert_tab_mask_add_delta symbol is there to do some compile-time assertions, there should be no such symbol actually compiled into the object files. I don't know, why the linker thinks it should find such a thing, when using /GL for whole program optimization.

some variations on static asserts

Thank You

[Kilu]

Wonderful, wonderful.

[alexz721]

Here you go:

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jfe1205/LAME/lame3.98.4-64.zip

Hi, was wondering if you could re-up this as the link is dead.

[john33]

Here you go:

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jfe1205/LAME/lame3.98.4-64.zip

Hi, was wondering if you could re-up this as the link is dead.

And again: http://www.john1205.webspace.virginmedia.c...me3.98.4-64.zip

[alexz721]

Here you go:

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jfe1205/LAME/lame3.98.4-64.zip

Hi, was wondering if you could re-up this as the link is dead.

And again: http://www.john1205.webspace.virginmedia.c...me3.98.4-64.zip

Much thanks, sir.