De-emphasis components, Postprocessor and a DSP plugin |
  |
De-emphasis components, Postprocessor and a DSP plugin |
 Feb 19 2013, 00:57
Post
#26
|
|
 Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 717 Joined: 1-December 07 Member No.: 49165  |
needs rewriting i suppose. people can use lvqcl's dsp in the meantime.
or: mudlord.info/temp/foo_dsp_effect.zip This post has been edited by mudlord: Feb 19 2013, 04:33 |
 |
 
|
|
Feb 19 2013, 05:59
Post
#27
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 55 Joined: 6-June 06 Member No.: 31522 |
QUOTE (kumbbl @ Feb 18 2013, 09:55)  just tested with some preemphasis CDs and works like a charm - many thanks for this great and very valuable foobar-component! this concerns to foo_deemph.dll and NOT to foo_dsp_effect.dll! |
|
|
|
|
Feb 19 2013, 10:39
Post
#28
|
|
|
Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 717 Joined: 1-December 07 Member No.: 49165 |
fair enough.
in the foo_dsp_effect thread, I made a optional download for people that dont want the foo_dsp_effect's deemp postprocessor service. that way, they can still use the superior component without it interfering. This post has been edited by mudlord: Feb 19 2013, 12:17 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 19 2013, 23:21
Post
#29
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 592 Joined: 12-May 06 From: Colorado, USA Member No.: 30694 |
The latest update to foo_dsp_effect has resolved the problem, so I wouldn't call any of them superior now... they're all equally good, IMHO:
original sweep = green foo_dsp_effect = red SoX deemph = yellow WaveEmph = blue foo_deemph, foo_dsp_deemph, and foo_dsp_convolver all produce results (almost?) identical to that of SoX deemph, so I didn't plot them.  If you want to have a look yourself, the WAVs are in the same folder as the graph. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2013, 19:49
Post
#30
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 406 Joined: 14-September 11 From: Szczecin, PL Member No.: 93712 |
OK, I have the question - what is the practical difference (in usage) between foo_deemph and foo_dsp_deemph ?
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2013, 20:06
Post
#31
|
|
 Group: Developer Posts: 3035 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183 |
I highlighted the relevant part in the 1st post with blue color. Or do you want to know something else?
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2013, 20:17
Post
#32
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 406 Joined: 14-September 11 From: Szczecin, PL Member No.: 93712 |
That blue text was there before I asked the question? Sorry for bothering you, looks like sometimes I'm blind :/ . That's exactly what I wanted to know. So looks like I need only foo_deemph, not dsp. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2013, 21:20
Post
#33
|
|
|
Group: Developer Posts: 3035 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183 |
The text was there, the color wasn't
|
|
|
|
|
May 6 2013, 00:52
Post
#34
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: 7-April 09 Member No.: 68742 |
QUOTE (lvqcl @ Feb 10 2013, 22:58) * To de-emphasize a track, add a tag named PRE_EMPHASIS or PRE-EMPHASIS with a value 1, on or yes. Other tracks are unaffected. Could foo_deemph be made to read 'FLAGS PRE' that already exist in my EAC/Cueripper cue sheets. I ask because I don't believe it is possible for foobar to read 'PRE-EMPHASIS' tag from an external cue sheet, eg, 'REM PRE_EMPHASIS yes'. |
|
|
|
|
May 6 2013, 15:35
Post
#35
|
|
|
Group: Developer Posts: 3035 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183 |
If all tracks were made with pre-emphasis then you can add PRE-EMPHASIS tag to the image file. (And don't forget to reload tags for the corresponding cue sheet)
|
|
|
|
|
May 9 2013, 19:29
Post
#36
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1515 Joined: 30-November 06 Member No.: 38207 |
Is there any reason why these components are not in the official repository?
-------------------- geocities.com/hydrogenaudio: http://goo.gl/tqYZj
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 05:27 |
