library manager without database.dat |
This forum is for developer discussions only. If you have a problem / bug report / idea / feature request that isn't related to foobar2000 SDK, post it in an appropiate forum instead - tech support questions go to support forum, everything else goes to general forum.
All non-developer posts on this forum will be removed. Continued abuse of this forum will result in admin actions (warnings, account suspension).
![]() ![]() |
library manager without database.dat |
Feb 9 2013, 00:09
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 8-February 13 Member No.: 106512 |
Hello all develepers,
I'm new to this forum, so please forgive me potentially stupid question.. I'm trying to prepare plugin that will read library data from file other than database.dat. The goal is to keep songs information encrypted. Please suggest me a direction I should follow. I spent few hours analyzing code (library_manager, library_callback, file_info and other classes) but still don't have the solution. I think it could be something like this: pfc::list_t<metadb_handle_ptr> library; static_api_ptr_t<library_manager>()->get_all_items(library); library.remove_all(); FILE OPEN library.add_item(file_item1); library.add_item(file_item2); .... but library is a copy and it will not remove items from original library list. /////// alternative solution ???? my first try with this was to catch all file input/output operations to make this on filesystem layer and encrypt/decrypt data on the fly. But I hadn't seen file operation callbacks (/service pointers) that concern database.dat. Is this possible? If yes it would be the best solution... Thank you in advance! |
|
|
|
Feb 16 2013, 12:49
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: FB2K Moderator (Donating) Posts: 4224 Joined: 24-February 03 Member No.: 5153 |
Have you tried to use NTFS encryption with database.dat? The SDK does not provide hooks to intercept or redirect access to database.dat.
-------------------- http://foosion.foobar2000.org/ - my components for foobar2000
|
|
|
|
Feb 16 2013, 16:18
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 406 Joined: 14-September 11 From: Szczecin, PL Member No.: 93712 |
As far as I remember whole "foobar2000" directory (the one with settings) needs to be encrypted with built-in NTFS encryption. If only file is encrypted it may become unencrypted after editing (like updating database.dat file due to library contents change. If you try to encrypt single file you get such warning, and yes, in case of Word and Notepad files it is true - after editing them they become unencrypted. So it's bit problematic - I don't know how encryption of whole settings directory may interfere with overall functionality of foobar...
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2013 - 01:46 |