Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Amazon launch of Cloud Player (Read 6280 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Amazon launch of Cloud Player

Quote
The new Cloud Player service adds a new “Save to Amazon Cloud Drive” button for saving MP3s to the cloud, as well as an option to upload music from a hard drive to a user’s Cloud Drive. Users are given 5 GB of free storage, but can get 20 GB if they purchase an album through Amazon. It’s $1 per GB after that.

Cloud Player comes in two flavors, an app for the web and an Android app counterpart.


Quote
Amazon has thrown down the gauntlet and set a high bar for cloud-based music streaming. Apple and Google, which are expected to launch their own cloud players sometime this year, will have to match Amazon on usability and price if they’re going to compete.


more: http://mashable.com/2011/03/29/amazon-clou...st-impressions/ or elsewhere

US only

I forgot to add link to the service: http://www.amazon.com/b/ref=amb_link_35509..._rd_i=163856011

Amazon launch of Cloud Player

Reply #1
Jeez more "cloud" crap?
I really don't understand these marketing terms, its stll the same old webstream people know, only with access to their own songs.....>_>

Amazon launch of Cloud Player

Reply #2
Well, it's marketing. If you're not using a new and flashy buzzword, you're not doing it right.

The functionality is pretty interesting, at least, though not of great use to me personally.

Amazon launch of Cloud Player

Reply #3
Jeez more "cloud" crap?

BS on cube! Why do you think 'cloud' is crap? 
Open your eyes and do some reading (as apparently you don't code java/python) if you don't get it
And sure you can make crap app, but you can't blame 'cloud' arch for it

Google failed at being first in this part, as apparent problem with labels, and Amazon's fast pace caused him troubles with breaking some EC2 services (apparently again, unique service servers are not at same geo location)

Amazon launch of Cloud Player

Reply #4
"Cloud" is crap because its the same shit, different name.

Like polishing a turd, its still a turd.

Amazon launch of Cloud Player

Reply #5
or perhaps you don't need it, as you pay for what you use that you can't make at crappy home net

Amazon launch of Cloud Player

Reply #6
More for fun then actually related, here is tag cloud of lengthy Amazon explanation summary (link) for its recent outage of its "Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud":