Nero Releases FREE Reference Quality MPEG-4 Audio Encoder, Nero Releases Command Line MPEG-4 & 3GPP AAC Solution |
![]() ![]() |
Nero Releases FREE Reference Quality MPEG-4 Audio Encoder, Nero Releases Command Line MPEG-4 & 3GPP AAC Solution |
May 12 2006, 11:21
Post
#376
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 105 Joined: 30-September 01 Member No.: 116 |
Currently with Foobar - but command line tagging will come very soon. one question, maybe allready asked, why is it that it does nothing and then it suddenly finishes? would be better to see a sinning simbol, or something. or at least one: "Working, please wait ..." I already added a nice progress display a few days ago Many thanks, but where this version is available? |
|
|
|
May 12 2006, 15:36
Post
#377
|
|
![]() Server Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4808 Joined: 24-September 01 Member No.: 13 |
|
|
|
|
May 12 2006, 19:28
Post
#378
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 684 Joined: 15-December 01 From: Denmark Member No.: 655 |
Found te bug. is has nothing to due with the encoder. If i extract the .wav and run the commandline myself, the files playbacks perfectly. What version of CDex did you use? I tried 1.60 from rarewares with different bitrates but couldn't get Winamp to barf. my version is 1.51 but my bug was caused by the ID3 tag that CDex adds to the file. Disable the id3 tag and the files should playback perfectly. -------------------- Sven Bent - Denmark
|
|
|
|
May 12 2006, 20:41
Post
#379
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 1983 Joined: 4-January 04 From: Austin, TX Member No.: 10933 |
Super high level question:
Is there a set of test results to compare this encoder against LAME, in particular at high bitrates? Can we safely use the last published set of results for Nero's encoder? |
|
|
|
May 12 2006, 20:56
Post
#380
|
|
![]() Server Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4808 Joined: 24-September 01 Member No.: 13 |
Super high level question: Is there a set of test results to compare this encoder against LAME, in particular at high bitrates? Can we safely use the last published set of results for Nero's encoder? It has had several important bugfixes as well as quality improvements[1] since then. I know we always say this but it's true! [1] <nitpick>TOS 8 violation!</nitpick> |
|
|
|
May 12 2006, 23:01
Post
#381
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 98 Joined: 22-February 03 From: Quebec, Montreal Member No.: 5117 |
On a P3 933Mhz, the nero encoder acheived 5.4x (36 secs) while CT+dimzon CLI (25 secs) one encoded at 7.8x (timed with a stop watch...)
3:16 song, CBR 64kbps HE-AAC Gonna try with a longer track on my A64 3200+ (SSE2) later |
|
|
|
May 13 2006, 03:49
Post
#382
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 24 Joined: 21-January 04 Member No.: 11426 |
If you want to reconvert yo aac (or m4a or mp4) audio to wav mono use ffmpeg with the aac codec and do:
ffmpeg.exe -i 2.mp4 -ac 1 test.wav |
|
|
|
May 13 2006, 22:45
Post
#383
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 23-November 04 From: Indiana Member No.: 18274 |
How do we add album art?
-------------------- [url=http://www.jevinskie.com]jevinskie.com[/url]
|
|
|
|
May 14 2006, 02:16
Post
#384
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 17-March 04 From: Athens, Greece Member No.: 12807 |
I found an interesting sample (it’s an artificial sound of a vehicle) taken from the Star Wars Episode III movie. I was able to ABX it all the way up to Q 1 (~420kbps) using some cheap Philips speakers (didn’t have my headphones around). The problem is located in the left channel, at the beginning of the track (0 - 0.4 sec), where there is some sort of distortion on those high frequency (~12khz) short “clicks”. If you find it hard to ABX, try a lower quality setting (for example Q 0.4) which will accentuate the problem, making it easier to spot.
You can find the 48khz stereo track which I used for the encodings (downmixed from a 5.1 channel, ac3 track) here. CODE foo_abx 1.3 report
foobar2000 v0.9.1 2006/05/14 03:15:21 File A: E:\New Folder\audio test\q 1.mp4 File B: E:\New Folder\audio test\Utapau_chase.wv 03:15:21 : Test started. 03:16:58 : 01/01 50.0% 03:18:02 : 02/02 25.0% 03:19:35 : 03/03 12.5% 03:21:47 : 04/04 6.3% 03:23:13 : 05/05 3.1% 03:26:13 : 06/06 1.6% 03:28:58 : 06/07 6.3% 03:30:17 : 07/08 3.5% 03:32:13 : 08/09 2.0% 03:37:31 : 09/10 1.1% 03:42:17 : 10/11 0.6% 03:48:36 : 11/12 0.3% 03:51:36 : 12/13 0.2% 03:53:02 : 13/14 0.1% 03:55:17 : 14/15 0.0% 03:55:22 : Test finished. ---------- Total: 14/15 (0.0%) -------------------- Let us so live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry. -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
May 14 2006, 02:38
Post
#385
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 391 Joined: 24-December 02 From: Eugene, OR Member No.: 4224 |
I found an interesting sample (it’s an artificial sound of a vehicle) taken from the Star Wars Episode III movie. I was able to ABX it all the way up to Q 1 (~420kbps) using some cheap Philips speakers (didn’t have my headphones around). The problem is located in the left channel, at the beginning of the track (0 - 0.4 sec), where there is some sort of distortion on those high frequency (~12khz) short “clicks”. If you find it hard to ABX, try a lower quality setting (for example Q 0.4) which will accentuate the problem, making it easier to spot. You can find the 48khz stereo track which I used for the encodings (downmixed from a 5.1 channel, ac3 track) here. CODE foo_abx 1.3 report foobar2000 v0.9.1 2006/05/14 03:15:21 File A: E:\New Folder\audio test\q 1.mp4 File B: E:\New Folder\audio test\Utapau_chase.wv 03:15:21 : Test started. 03:16:58 : 01/01 50.0% 03:18:02 : 02/02 25.0% 03:19:35 : 03/03 12.5% 03:21:47 : 04/04 6.3% 03:23:13 : 05/05 3.1% 03:26:13 : 06/06 1.6% 03:28:58 : 06/07 6.3% 03:30:17 : 07/08 3.5% 03:32:13 : 08/09 2.0% 03:37:31 : 09/10 1.1% 03:42:17 : 10/11 0.6% 03:48:36 : 11/12 0.3% 03:51:36 : 12/13 0.2% 03:53:02 : 13/14 0.1% 03:55:17 : 14/15 0.0% 03:55:22 : Test finished. ---------- Total: 14/15 (0.0%) Would the fact that it's coming from AC3 be an issue? -------------------- http://www.pkulak.com
|
|
|
|
May 16 2006, 10:43
Post
#386
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 249 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 48 |
I am about to try using Foobar 0.9.1 to transcode some wv files to m4a using the new Nero codec. Trouble is I have no idea about command line stuff.
Can any of you chaps tell me the command line for Foobar to transcde my wv files to ~ 128 m4a files. Sorry to be a bof (boring old fart) Cheers |
|
|
|
May 16 2006, 10:45
Post
#387
|
|
![]() Server Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4808 Joined: 24-September 01 Member No.: 13 |
I am about to try using Foobar 0.9.1 to transcode some wv files to m4a using the new Nero codec. Trouble is I have no idea about command line stuff. Can any of you chaps tell me the command line for Foobar to transcde my wv files to ~ 128 m4a files. Sorry to be a bof (boring old fart) Cheers http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=44310 This post has been edited by Garf: May 16 2006, 10:46 |
|
|
|
May 16 2006, 11:46
Post
#388
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 249 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 48 |
QUOTE Thanks Garf. I saw that QUOTE -ignorelength -q 0.5 -if - -of %d but didn't know what this bit meant QUOTE -if - -of In my ignorance I thought that "something" had to be placed between the "if" and the "of" Cheers |
|
|
|
May 16 2006, 12:06
Post
#389
|
|
![]() Server Admin Group: Admin Posts: 4808 Joined: 24-September 01 Member No.: 13 |
QUOTE Thanks Garf. I saw that QUOTE -ignorelength -q 0.5 -if - -of %d but didn't know what this bit meant QUOTE -if - -of In my ignorance I thought that "something" had to be placed between the "if" and the "of" Cheers if = input file of = output file you'll notice there's an "-" inbetween, which means "standard input". This system avoids writing a temporary file and is supported by foobar2000. So, it means, take input from standard input, output to %d (filled in by fb2k) This post has been edited by Garf: May 16 2006, 12:06 |
|
|
|
May 16 2006, 13:54
Post
#390
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 249 Joined: 29-September 01 Member No.: 48 |
Cheers Garf!!
|
|
|
|
May 16 2006, 16:08
Post
#391
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 85 Joined: 12-February 06 Member No.: 27711 |
Just a little suggestion, to have minimum OS requirements listed on http://www.nero.com/nerodigital/eng/Nero_Digital_Audio.html
Specifically, so that folks like myself and others earlier in the thread who likewise downloaded the programme will know a unicode-capable OS is required. Looking at http://www.nero.com/nerodigital/eng/Nero_D...quirements.html gives a misleading impression. Cheers. |
|
|
|
May 23 2006, 13:06
Post
#392
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 61 Joined: 2-April 03 Member No.: 5795 |
Sounds really promising, wish I could give it a try. How long till the UNIX version? Can you elaborate on that? Thanks a lot for the generous offer. Either 1 Nero Month. or When it's done Just wondering, compared to the moon-related one, is the Nero Month longer or shorter? Or are we even in the second conditional already? |
|
|
|
May 23 2006, 15:18
Post
#393
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 126 Joined: 9-March 06 From: NRW, Germany Member No.: 28371 |
I think that "1 Nero Month" and "When it's done" is pretty much the same, at least for the customer.
|
|
|
|
May 24 2006, 16:58
Post
#394
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 391 Joined: 24-December 02 From: Eugene, OR Member No.: 4224 |
I was wondering if a dev could take a look at a tagging problem that I've been having:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=44454 Basicaly, if I take a Nero-encoded file and tag it with AtomicParsley Foobar can't read it, but if I encode the same wav with iTunes then tag with AP, all is well. Of course, if tagging gets bundled into the executable, this problem goes away and I won't have to try to rely on programs that try to "douche" foobar2000 tags. -------------------- http://www.pkulak.com
|
|
|
|
May 24 2006, 17:00
Post
#395
|
|
|
Nero MPEG4 developer Group: Developer Posts: 1466 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 8 |
We will issue a new update in the few days, which will among other things also include a command line tagger.
|
|
|
|
May 24 2006, 17:09
Post
#396
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 126 Joined: 19-December 02 From: Athens, Greece Member No.: 4152 |
sorry for the perhaps lame question but is there a free frontend we could use?
|
|
|
|
May 24 2006, 17:35
Post
#397
|
|
|
Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2332 Joined: 28-June 02 From: Argentina Member No.: 2425 |
sorry for the perhaps lame question but is there a free frontend we could use? its called command prompt -------------------- MAREO: http://www.webearce.com.ar
|
|
|
|
May 24 2006, 18:03
Post
#398
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 193 Joined: 30-September 01 From: C-ville, VA Member No.: 83 |
|
|
|
|
May 25 2006, 13:02
Post
#399
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 326 Joined: 30-September 05 From: London, Europe Member No.: 24805 |
We will issue a new update in the few days, which will among other things also include a command line tagger. Will this solve all the 'non-compliant tagging' disputes that several developers in the AAC/M4A world seem to blame eachother for? And is it true Nero writes the tag at the end of a file? This post has been edited by Maurits: May 25 2006, 13:06 |
|
|
|
May 25 2006, 13:24
Post
#400
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 21-May 06 Member No.: 31002 |
We will issue a new update in the few days, which will among other things also include a command line tagger. Will that commandline tagger enable the single mp4 feature such as CUE sheet, album art, etc? The feature stated in the first post of this thread is: "* Store Entire Audio Album in a Single .mp4 File with all the Features of an Audio CD embedded inside, but at a fraction of the space!" |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 21:45 |