IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Transcoding Transparent -> Transparent
dsimcha
post Mar 16 2010, 18:56
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 58
Joined: 2-November 04
Member No.: 17953



While I understand in theory why transcoding lossy -> lossy is a bad idea, I'm very curious if there are any empirical results on the following scenario: Assume you have a lossy file encoded using codec A, but at a bitrate that produces perceptual transparency compared to the original lossless file. Then you transcode the lossy file produced by codec A into codec B, but at a bitrate that usually produces perceptual transparency relative to the source material. In this case, this means codec B should produce perceptual transparency relative to its source, which is the output of codec A.

Has anyone ever actually done any listening tests to prove that this kind of transcoding, where the results of codec A are transparent compared to the lossless source and the results of codec B are transparent compared to the results of codec A, can result in output from codec B that is not transparent relative to the lossless source in real world conditions, i.e. a reasonable number of generations and going from, say, MP3 to Vorbis?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
timcupery
post Mar 16 2010, 21:54
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 780
Joined: 19-December 01
From: Tar Heel country
Member No.: 683



I did some of these tests some years back, but nothing recently.
the losses do add up.
it may be impossible to tell the difference between generation n and generation n+1, but after a few iterations the differences from generation 0 (i.e., the original lossless file) will begin to be obvious.


--------------------
God kills a kitten every time you encode with CBR 320
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JunkieXL
post Mar 16 2010, 22:02
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 358
Joined: 3-April 05
Member No.: 21165



I've done it a few times and I had a hard time distinguishing any differences between the two. This was usually with an mp3 to mp3 conversion.

I only did this because I wanted one track from a cue sheet that used one mp3 for all tracks.
JXL
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
[JAZ]
post Mar 16 2010, 22:12
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 1559
Joined: 24-June 02
From: Catalunya(Spain)
Member No.: 2383



@JunkieXL: There are tools to cut (and even join) mp3 files

mpTrim, mp3directcut, to name a few...


@dsimcha: Yes, it has been tried a few times in these boards (don't have links at hand). Like it was said, the differences add up, and generally, it is worse to use the same encoder twice than using two different formats.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bodhi
post Mar 16 2010, 22:13
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 259
Joined: 10-June 06
Member No.: 31712



QUOTE (dsimcha @ Mar 16 2010, 18:56) *
Has anyone ever actually done any listening tests to prove that this kind of transcoding

Some people like /mnt can ABX VBR0 (from the source) so you can imagine if it comes from transcoded files!
Personally, I'm sure I couldn't distinguish it. One thing would annoy me though: The fact that I know that I'm listening to transcoded files! laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 06:42