Your lossy codec of choice in 2006?, Format popularity |
- No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service
![]() ![]() |
Your lossy codec of choice in 2006?, Format popularity |
Dec 5 2006, 21:26
Post
#251
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 27-November 06 From: eijsden Member No.: 38115 |
@ neorenegade:
It's YOUR opinion that my opinion is full of nonsense. again: I said that my opinion is NOT based on true facts, tests or something like that. But it just explaines why I choose atrac over other lossy codecs, so that people understand why I prefer it. greetz This post has been edited by atrac: Dec 5 2006, 21:27 -------------------- - emotion drives the world -
|
|
|
|
Dec 5 2006, 22:35
Post
#252
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 264 Joined: 13-February 05 From: Germany, Kempten Member No.: 19808 |
QUOTE @ neorenegade: It's YOUR opinion that my opinion is full of nonsense. again: I said that my opinion is NOT based on true facts, tests or something like that. But it just explaines why I choose atrac over other lossy codecs, so that people understand why I prefer it. greetz making such posts is wasting space on HA.org's server and makes the discussion forum unclearly. The readers don't want to know your favorite meal or your life's story. HA.org's aim is to support codec-devs. If you want to tell somebody what your dog's name is or why you extremely love atrac and HATE MP3, then make your own homepage where you can write what you want (I'm looking at you gameplaya *lol*) Short: Make posts based on true events which help readers posters and devs coming to their aim. See HA rules. By the way: MP3 too -------------------- FB2K,APE&LAME
|
|
|
|
Dec 5 2006, 22:54
Post
#253
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 27-November 06 From: eijsden Member No.: 38115 |
making such posts is wasting space on HA.org's server and makes the discussion forum unclearly. The readers don't want to know your favorite meal or your life's story. HA.org's aim is to support codec-devs. If you want to tell somebody what your dog's name is or why you extremely love atrac and HATE MP3, then make your own homepage where you can write what you want (I'm looking at you gameplaya *lol*) Short: Make posts based on true events which help readers posters and devs coming to their aim. See HA rules. By the way: MP3 too you're right. it's a waste of space, these discussions. but I really don't understand what the fuss is about.... they ask me what codec I prefer, I say it's atrac, I just simply explain why I love it, and then I get all these kinda pissed attitude reactions. I've stayed correct, nice and appologised for it. so I just tell Why I love atrac, and they say it's a waste of space, violating rules, stupid nonsense and everything...and the post of neorenegade is not a problem at all?! I just don't understand... greetz This post has been edited by atrac: Dec 5 2006, 22:55 -------------------- - emotion drives the world -
|
|
|
|
Dec 6 2006, 00:10
Post
#254
|
|
![]() Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 713 Joined: 8-July 04 From: Sao Paulo Member No.: 15173 |
@atrac
Don't mind the harshness of some people. That's how things are at HA. The aim is to keep a healthy and sane environment for everyone. Your past claims are full of misconceptions and I think that it triggered a red flag. When you claim that ATRAC is "warmer and natural" and that MP3 is not that "warm and natural" without providing hard evidence (ABX) you open room for questioning because most likely you are a victim of the placebo effect. It is a good thing you apologized, however stating that it is your personal opinion does not give you clearance to state unproven things about one or other codec. Anyway don't take the harsh posts personally. It is just how it is here. -------------------- http://volutabro.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
Dec 6 2006, 03:05
Post
#255
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 104 Joined: 5-November 03 Member No.: 9669 |
I fully quote beto.
Also, atrac, I suggest you to try yourself some blinded tests. It is very fun and with foobar it is very simple. If you do them, I'm sure you will see all the whole story under a very different view, and maybe you will understand because many people here doesn't like post like the first yours. |
|
|
|
Dec 6 2006, 15:17
Post
#256
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 264 Joined: 13-February 05 From: Germany, Kempten Member No.: 19808 |
QUOTE Anyway don't take the harsh posts personally. It is just how it is here. yep. -------------------- FB2K,APE&LAME
|
|
|
|
Dec 18 2006, 06:35
Post
#257
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 100 Joined: 29-May 06 From: Medford, OR, USA Member No.: 31279 |
MP3
I played around with EAC/Nero ACC and loved the results but LAME is still my favorite lossy format. However my at home listening is almost exclusively WavPack lossless. |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2006, 17:48
Post
#258
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 16-May 06 Member No.: 30853 |
I have voted "other", as I am currently using Atrac Lossless 352kbps as it allows me to do the following:
I also do create MP3's (Lame) using EAC for my wife's MP3 CD's for the car at 256kbps (as the player struggles with VBR) and V5 for my childrens' ipod/MP3 player/mobile phone. MP3 seems to have enough votes though! Sorry for rattling on. Cheers Peter |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2006, 21:23
Post
#259
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1455 Joined: 22-November 05 From: Jakarta Member No.: 25929 |
I also do create MP3's (Lame) using EAC for my wife's MP3 CD's for the car at 256kbps (as the player struggles with VBR) and V5 for my childrens' ipod/MP3 player/mobile phone. MP3 seems to have enough votes though! I think CBR 256 is way overkill, especially in a car. You can use CBR 128, or CBR 192 for added peace of mind. That's 50% and 25% space saving, respectively.
-------------------- Nobody is Perfect.
I am Nobody. http://pandu.poluan.info |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2006, 21:53
Post
#260
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 84 Joined: 16-January 05 Member No.: 19096 |
most of my collection is FLAC>.mp3 but recently have been using Nero's AAC because I LIKE IT.
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2006, 22:46
Post
#261
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 16-May 06 Member No.: 30853 |
I also do create MP3's (Lame) using EAC for my wife's MP3 CD's for the car at 256kbps (as the player struggles with VBR) and V5 for my childrens' ipod/MP3 player/mobile phone. MP3 seems to have enough votes though! I think CBR 256 is way overkill, especially in a car. You can use CBR 128, or CBR 192 for added peace of mind. That's 50% and 25% space saving, respectively.I wouldn't disagree with you. It's just that my wife only wants so many albums on a CD Rom and I might as well use a higher bit rate, rather than leave a load of empty space. She also sometimes plays them on a CD MP3 Walkman. |
|
|
|
Dec 25 2006, 10:24
Post
#262
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 29 Joined: 28-July 05 Member No.: 23576 |
.mp3 (lame) for me. Also .flac for lossless when needed.
-------------------- http://www.sheffieldbleep.co.uk
|
|
|
|
Jan 2 2007, 09:10
Post
#263
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4887 Joined: 12-August 04 From: Exeter, UK Member No.: 16217 |
Poll closed. Please take a look at the latest poll.
-------------------- I'm on a horse.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 02:24 |