.Ogg Vorbis aotuv, Question for Aoyumi |
![]() ![]() |
.Ogg Vorbis aotuv, Question for Aoyumi |
Feb 23 2011, 00:18
Post
#426
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1559 Joined: 24-June 02 From: Catalunya(Spain) Member No.: 2383 |
You needed four minutes for 8 positive ABX in a "Very easily noticeable" test? :?
What's wrong, you methodology to test, or your description? |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 00:35
Post
#427
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 677 Joined: 4-May 08 Member No.: 53282 |
Sorry, don't get your problem. I knew which artefact I was searching & I always found it, so for me it was easy.
As I said the bug is not included in the ABXing. Obviously you didn't read correctly. Edit: In case it wasn't clear I will re-word it: I ABXed the 5 first seconds only (which is not transparent) & the bug itself is at second 10-13 so not ABXed (but it doesn't need ABXing anyway as it is huge) This post has been edited by sauvage78: Feb 23 2011, 00:44 -------------------- CDImage+CUE
Secure [Low/C2/AR(2)] Flac -4 |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 00:42
Post
#428
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 512 Joined: 4-June 02 Member No.: 2220 |
Yeah, I heard it, sounds like water jug artifact that should not be there.
Odd, at -q0 it doesn't f*** up at all that I can hear. edit: forgot to mention was using Rarewares generic compile, if it matters. edit2: artifact bug reported starts happening at -q2 and above This post has been edited by Destroid: Feb 23 2011, 00:55 -------------------- "Something bothering you, Mister Spock?"
|
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 07:49
Post
#429
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 22 Joined: 22-August 07 From: Europe Member No.: 46411 |
Hi there,
first things first: a very big Thank you to Aoyumi and John33 for all the good work!!! Is there a chance that this bug concerning short_block_test_2 will be audible in "normal" music? Regards, Clobon |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 11:56
Post
#430
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 236 Joined: 14-January 04 From: Kanto, Japan Member No.: 11215 |
Bug report: incorrect encode of short_block_test_2.flac (you can download it here - http://web.archive.org/web/20030618115117/...s/test_samples/ ) added: here it is [attachment=6375:short_block_test_2.wv] Thank you for a report. I investigated it and found one mistake. I will release the revision soon. Aoyumi |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 12:32
Post
#431
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 2980 Joined: 2-December 07 Member No.: 49183 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 13:14
Post
#432
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 14-September 04 From: Belarus, Vitebsk Member No.: 16992 |
@Aoyumi
At first Aoyumi, thank you very match for your work again !!!!! On topic: I have idea, It is not new and maybe a little bit premature but I propose to release final beta6 branch (e.g. beta 6.4 ... you know) as Aotuv Release2 (R2) with the purpose to reflect stability and fine changes from Release 1 |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 15:42
Post
#433
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 89 Joined: 28-October 03 Member No.: 9505 |
aoTuV Beta6.01 [beta6 >> beta6.01] (2011/02/23)
# In the specific pattern, the bug that caused overflow was fixed. -------------------- Sorry for my English.
|
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 15:51
Post
#434
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 14-September 04 From: Belarus, Vitebsk Member No.: 16992 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 15:51
Post
#435
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 236 Joined: 14-January 04 From: Kanto, Japan Member No.: 11215 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 16:52
Post
#436
|
|
![]() xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3706 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
John! Please repeat OK, give a few minutes. -------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 17:44
Post
#437
|
|
![]() xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3706 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
6.01 complies now available.
-------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 18:25
Post
#438
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 933 Joined: 3-June 02 From: USA Member No.: 2204 |
Is it Oggenc 2.85 using aoTuVb 6.01 or Oggenc 2.87 using aoTuVb 6.01? Just wondering because of the version listed on the Rarewares.org page before I 7-Zip them up and archive them locally.
Link: http://www.rarewares.org/ogg-oggenc.php#oggenc-aotuv -------------------- Complexity of incoherent design.
|
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 18:49
Post
#439
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 14-September 04 From: Belarus, Vitebsk Member No.: 16992 |
C:\>oggenc2.exe -h OggEnc v2.87 (aoTuV Beta 6.01) © 2000-2005 Michael Smith <msmith@xiph.org> & portions by John Edwards <john.edwards33@ntlworld.com> Usage: oggenc2 [options] input.wav [...] |
|
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 19:26
Post
#440
|
|
![]() xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3706 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
Is it Oggenc 2.85 using aoTuVb 6.01 or Oggenc 2.87 using aoTuVb 6.01? Just wondering because of the version listed on the Rarewares.org page before I 7-Zip them up and archive them locally. Link: http://www.rarewares.org/ogg-oggenc.php#oggenc-aotuv Sorry, I'll change that to 2.87. Edit: Done. This post has been edited by john33: Feb 23 2011, 19:29 -------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
Feb 24 2011, 04:56
Post
#441
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1315 Joined: 3-January 05 From: Argentina, Bs As Member No.: 18803 |
Thank you, Aoyumi.
Really great work. |
|
|
|
Feb 24 2011, 06:02
Post
#442
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 95 Joined: 22-December 09 From: nicyoume Member No.: 76223 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2011, 19:40
Post
#443
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 24-February 11 Member No.: 88459 |
what is the recommended preset for the current version
thank you all |
|
|
|
Feb 24 2011, 20:00
Post
#444
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 37 Joined: 2-January 07 From: Republic of Srps Member No.: 39225 |
I'm having trouble with john33's oggenc2 and encoding of 6 ch WAV file: bitrate is too low (average 151 kbps @ Q10), sounds awfully. Previous version (based on b5.7) encodes file properly.
-------------------- --------------------
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2011, 22:35
Post
#445
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 14-September 04 From: Belarus, Vitebsk Member No.: 16992 |
Can confirm the bug with venc.exe too. Vanilla vorbis 1.3.2 is ok.
Looks like bug in aotuv but not in John compilation. This post has been edited by alter4: Feb 24 2011, 22:45 |
|
|
|
Feb 25 2011, 10:14
Post
#446
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 95 Joined: 22-December 09 From: nicyoume Member No.: 76223 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 25 2011, 10:28
Post
#447
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 677 Joined: 4-May 08 Member No.: 53282 |
It's called "vendor string", both looks identical in your post, so what's your problem? john33 ain't gonna display oggenc2 version in vorbis's vendor string if that's what you're asking for. (I'm not sure I get what you want ...)
This post has been edited by sauvage78: Feb 25 2011, 10:33 -------------------- CDImage+CUE
Secure [Low/C2/AR(2)] Flac -4 |
|
|
|
Feb 25 2011, 10:36
Post
#448
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 95 Joined: 22-December 09 From: nicyoume Member No.: 76223 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 25 2011, 11:09
Post
#449
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 14-September 04 From: Belarus, Vitebsk Member No.: 16992 |
Very interesting things, at my laptop all is ok (with venc and oggenc2) with converting 6ch-wav to 6ch-ogg, but the 6ch samples are different. Maybe the problem is file specific.
I will additionally check the problem at home today night and attach a problematic sample if so. |
|
|
|
Feb 25 2011, 12:17
Post
#450
|
|
![]() xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3706 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
@john33 Could you change your oggenc2's writing library in OGG COMMENT? oggenc2(yours) AO; aoTuV [20110223] (based on Xiph.Org's libVorbis) venc AO; aoTuV [20110223] (based on Xiph.Org's libVorbis) I wanna diplay your oggenc2 for aotuv like this ![]() Are you saying that you want the 'AO: ' removed from the front of the Vendor String? If so, I'm not sure that I should considering Aoyumi created the modified libraries and that is his chosen Vendor String. To change it might suggest that I am using a different version of the libraries. -------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 08:21 |