Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.

Poll

Which is your choice of container in 2006!

Matroska
[ 13 ] (34.2%)
Avi
[ 14 ] (36.8%)
OGM
[ 0 ] (0%)
MP4
[ 10 ] (26.3%)
Mpeg, Mov and Others...
[ 1 ] (2.6%)

Total Members Voted: 43

Topic: Which is your choice of container in 2006! (Read 4242 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Which is your choice of container in 2006!

Matroska! Because it is versatile... Takes almost anything...!
The virtue of love isnt finding the perfect person, but by loving the imperfect person perfectly.

Which is your choice of container in 2006!

Reply #1 –
How about Mp4? How is it compared to MatRoska?
The virtue of love isnt finding the perfect person, but by loving the imperfect person perfectly.

Which is your choice of container in 2006!

Reply #2 –
a choice?  : whatever works for a specific purpose, usually its avi for editing, mp4 for web (proof) delivery.
PANIC: CPU 1: Cache Error (unrecoverable - dcache data) Eframe = 0x90000000208cf3b8
NOTICE - cpu 0 didn't dump TLB, may be hung

Which is your choice of container in 2006!

Reply #3 –
AVI definitally.

I dont see the use in anything else. I tried taking one of the DVDs I backed up and encoding it with x264 and matroska, and it didnt play, even though I had the x264 codec thingy installed. Sure, I could work and find out how to play it, but I didnt want to take the time. XviD in .AVI is fine.
And if you believe theres not a chance to die...

Which is your choice of container in 2006!

Reply #4 –
I voted AVI
[ Commodore 64 Forever...! ]

Which is your choice of container in 2006!

Reply #5 –
Matroska instead of AVI because it's so easy, I don't have to worry about anything.

Matroska instead of MP4 because I don't own a DVD player, I don't own an iPod Video, there's hardly any standalone player out there yet that can play standard MPEG-4 AVC videos (or am I wrong?)... Well maybe in the future I will switch from Matroska to MP4 when buy a standalone player, but at the moment Matroska gives me the best freedom of choice when it comes to Codecs and several Audio/Subtitle streams.

Which is your choice of container in 2006!

Reply #6 –
Matroska. Very versatile accepts anything from Subs to multiple audio streams to Chapters. I only watch videos in the laptop or connect it to the tv using tv-out so i don't really care about "lack of compatibility" with certain boxes.