foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7, standalone Audioscrobbler component |
![]() ![]() |
foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7, standalone Audioscrobbler component |
Jun 16 2006, 07:52
Post
#51
|
|
![]() Mp3tag developer Group: FB2K Moderator (Donating) Posts: 854 Joined: 5-May 03 From: Dresden, Germany Member No.: 6411 |
Just released foo_audioscrobbler 1.3.4 which is a maintenance release compiled with the new SDK.
-------------------- Mp3tag - universal multi-format tag editor
http://www.mp3tag.de/en/ |
|
|
|
Jun 21 2006, 09:50
Post
#52
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 3-March 05 Member No.: 20311 |
Hi,
great plugin! Is there a special reason why tracks are not submitted one at a time, and instead in batches of five? edit: Nevermind, that was just because I had updated from 1.3.2 -> 1.3.4 Thanks! This post has been edited by alive: Jun 21 2006, 09:51 -------------------- Pusk is the new Start.
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2006, 23:10
Post
#53
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 63 Joined: 13-May 05 Member No.: 22032 |
I play a fair amount of my classical music off vinyl, CD and SACD and use mp3s just over 30secs long to submit what I have been listening to. Today I had to upgrade foobar and the audioscrobbler plugin as the old version I was using stopped working. The new version doesn't seem to like files that are only just over 30 seconds long, they don't submit and no warning or reason is given. Have you increased the minimum track length to above 30 seconds for some reason?
In case anyone thinks I just want to spam the system, my profile is here: http://www.last.fm/user/spod_mandel I don't exactly submit an excessive amount of music. This does make the new version of foobar2000 essentially unusable for me. Just discovered why the old version wasn't working, so am using that again for now. This post has been edited by mandel: Jun 29 2006, 23:32 |
|
|
|
Jul 1 2006, 01:22
Post
#54
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 20 Joined: 11-July 05 Member No.: 23262 |
When you say "over 30 seconds", are they over 31 seconds too, because that's the minimum length for submitting.
|
|
|
|
Jul 1 2006, 01:25
Post
#55
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 63 Joined: 13-May 05 Member No.: 22032 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 2 2006, 21:14
Post
#56
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 202 Joined: 11-June 06 Member No.: 31727 |
...
how do i fix it. i open the console and get "[16:03:58] Handshaking: Client up to date. [16:03:58] Submit interval set to 1 seconds. [16:03:58] Handshake successful. [16:04:00] Startup time : 0:11.672720 [16:09:07] Submitting 16 cached tracks to Audioscrobbler... [16:09:07] Submission failed: bad authorization. [16:13:50] Submitting 17 cached tracks to Audioscrobbler... [16:13:50] Submission failed: bad authorization." |
|
|
|
Jul 2 2006, 21:18
Post
#57
|
|
![]() Mp3tag developer Group: FB2K Moderator (Donating) Posts: 854 Joined: 5-May 03 From: Dresden, Germany Member No.: 6411 |
Are you using foo_audioscrobbler 1.3.4? I'm asking because the latest version should re-handshake if it gets BADAUTH as reply.
When you say "over 30 seconds", are they over 31 seconds too, because that's the minimum length for submitting. Nope, are about 30.5 seconds long. Are you saying 31 seconds is the offical last.fm policy or just what is specified in the foobar plugin? Mandel, there is a rounding issue for tracks between 30 and 31 seconds in the current version of the plugin. I'll fix it to the next release. This post has been edited by Florian: Jul 2 2006, 21:16 -------------------- Mp3tag - universal multi-format tag editor
http://www.mp3tag.de/en/ |
|
|
|
Jul 2 2006, 22:05
Post
#58
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 238 Joined: 20-March 06 Member No.: 28640 |
well nice done.
but as i dont have internet at my music-pc iŽd really really like an plugin with all these statistic-features offline available! |
|
|
|
Jul 2 2006, 23:59
Post
#59
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 322 Joined: 25-March 06 From: Slovakia Member No.: 28819 |
well nice done. but as i dont have internet at my music-pc iŽd really really like an plugin with all these statistic-features offline available! There are two components called foo_playcount, an "official" and an "unofficial" one. I never tried them, but they may provide the features you're looking for. -------------------- www.last.fm/user/molnart
|
|
|
|
Jul 12 2006, 06:08
Post
#60
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 20-December 05 From: Varna, Bulgaria Member No.: 26543 |
Are you using foo_audioscrobbler 1.3.4? I'm asking because the latest version should re-handshake if it gets BADAUTH as reply. I have the same problem with foo_audioscrobbler 1.3.4: CODE Handshaking: Client up to date.
Submit interval set to 1 seconds. Handshake successful. . . Submitting track to Audioscrobbler... Submission succeeded. . . Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2006, 05:38
Post
#61
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 177 Joined: 13-December 02 From: USA Member No.: 4068 |
I have had problems submitting tracks for the last two days:
QUOTE Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. Not submitting. Cache contains 25 tracks. Handshaking: Client up to date. Handshake successful. Submission failed: bad authorization. There's more from where that came from, anyone else having the same problems? |
|
|
|
Jul 17 2006, 11:29
Post
#62
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 31-March 06 Member No.: 29033 |
I had the same problem yesterday.
Did you install the shiny new last.m client? If so, uninstalling the client helped in my case. |
|
|
|
Jul 19 2006, 09:35
Post
#63
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 24-April 03 Member No.: 6167 |
I can't get it to work... keep getting:
CODE Not submitting. Cache contains 5 tracks. Cannot connect to server. I ran ethereal, and it seems that it's getting a 404 error for the ip address 62.216.251.200, which according to a whois belongs to last.fm. Could they have changed the server? |
|
|
|
Jul 19 2006, 09:50
Post
#64
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 34 Joined: 3-December 04 Member No.: 18476 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2006, 10:00
Post
#65
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 24-April 03 Member No.: 6167 |
Apparently, the submission server is down, so that COULD be the issue...
And to go a bit off topic - I totaly hate last.fm's new app. Why the hell shoud I have two players open? Hate that stuff. |
|
|
|
Jul 19 2006, 10:00
Post
#66
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 31-March 06 Member No.: 29033 |
Last.fm's submission server is currently down:
QUOTE Submissions Server # Status: OFFLINE You can check the server status here: http://www.last.fm/forum/21713/_/51596 EDIT: And I totally agree with you, Hellspam. Especially as there seem to be submission problems when using the app (e.g. as radio player) and still having the dll for foobar (listening to my music). Well, no radio for me then... This post has been edited by AliHaze: Jul 19 2006, 10:09 |
|
|
|
Jul 19 2006, 10:50
Post
#67
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: 18-October 03 Member No.: 9371 |
[EDIT] It was just a matter of patience... Working perfectly, thanks! [/EDIT]
_______ ___ __ _ Yeah, I'm getting the same thing guys... And Last.FM says their server is up... I'm using 1.3.4 with fbk 0.9.2 CODE Startup time : 0:00.118958
Cannot connect to server. Not submitting. Cache contains 16 tracks. Handshaking: Client up to date. Submit interval set to 1 seconds. Handshake successful. Submitting 10 of 17 cached tracks to Audioscrobbler... Cannot connect to server. This post has been edited by encosion: Jul 19 2006, 11:44 |
|
|
|
Jul 19 2006, 11:03
Post
#68
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 127 Joined: 11-April 06 Member No.: 29396 |
Give it some time, it's probably overloaded from everybody submitting all their cached tracks.
|
|
|
|
Jul 25 2006, 14:56
Post
#69
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 291 Joined: 27-January 04 From: Germany Member No.: 11530 |
Florian, are you also the author of the official plugin on Last.fm and is your version 1.3.2 of the plugin the same as version 1.3.2 that's currently available on Last.fm? I wonder which one I should use (official 1.3.2 or unofficial 1.3.4).
It does the same as the new beta Audioscrobbler, except that you won't need to run the additional Audioscrobbler application in the system notification area. Do you plan to update the stand-alone plugin to use the new protocol introduced with the Last.fm software?
This post has been edited by Hancoque: Jul 25 2006, 15:00 |
|
|
|
Jul 25 2006, 15:59
Post
#70
|
|
![]() Mp3tag developer Group: FB2K Moderator (Donating) Posts: 854 Joined: 5-May 03 From: Dresden, Germany Member No.: 6411 |
Florian, are you also the author of the official plugin on Last.fm and is your version 1.3.2 of the plugin the same as version 1.3.2 that's currently available on Last.fm? I wonder which one I should use (official 1.3.2 or unofficial 1.3.4). Yes, version 1.3.2 is also from me, but Russ is a little bit slow with updating the downloads section QUOTE It does the same as the new beta Audioscrobbler, except that you won't need to run the additional Audioscrobbler application in the system notification area. Do you plan to update the stand-alone plugin to use the new protocol introduced with the Last.fm software?I'm not aware of a new protocol version and I'm still using version 1.1. Can you please point me to the new spec? -------------------- Mp3tag - universal multi-format tag editor
http://www.mp3tag.de/en/ |
|
|
|
Jul 25 2006, 16:25
Post
#71
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 291 Joined: 27-January 04 From: Germany Member No.: 11530 |
I'm not aware of a new protocol version and I'm still using version 1.1. Can you please point me to the new spec? I have no spec but I found this post: http://www.last.fm/forum/34905/_/135053 QUOTE (Russ @ Jul 15 2006, 11:05) Old-style plugin authors: I can change your old plugin forum into a group forum if you wish to continue supporting it. Alternatively, I can help you port your plugin to the new Audioscrobbler Client protocol. That made me assume that there is a new protocol of some sort.
This post has been edited by Hancoque: Jul 25 2006, 16:26 |
|
|
|
Jul 26 2006, 08:09
Post
#72
|
|
![]() Mp3tag developer Group: FB2K Moderator (Donating) Posts: 854 Joined: 5-May 03 From: Dresden, Germany Member No.: 6411 |
I have no spec but I found this post: http://www.last.fm/forum/34905/_/135053 QUOTE (Russ @ Jul 15 2006, 11:05) Old-style plugin authors: I can change your old plugin forum into a group forum if you wish to continue supporting it. Alternatively, I can help you port your plugin to the new Audioscrobbler Client protocol. That made me assume that there is a new protocol of some sort.Yes, but it is the new protocol for talking to the official Audioscrobbler client application. The protocol for talking with the severs wasn't changed. -------------------- Mp3tag - universal multi-format tag editor
http://www.mp3tag.de/en/ |
|
|
|
Jul 26 2006, 13:35
Post
#73
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 291 Joined: 27-January 04 From: Germany Member No.: 11530 |
Then never mind.
|
|
|
|
Jul 27 2006, 07:17
Post
#74
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 118 Joined: 21-August 05 Member No.: 24044 |
Would it be posible to add an option to enable submitting tracks from Audio CDs even if "Only submit tracks from the Media Library" is enabled.
|
|
|
|
Jul 28 2006, 14:00
Post
#75
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 28-July 06 Member No.: 33387 |
Getting bad auth messages like others. The last.fm page says the submission server is up. Wondered if anyone else is seeing these issues?
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 22:11 |