WinDuckŪ for Windows, CD Ripper by Dr. Oviri |
  |
WinDuckŪ for Windows, CD Ripper by Dr. Oviri |
 Apr 6 2007, 03:35
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Banned Posts: 139 Joined: 21-March 07 Member No.: 41686  |
Today I will introduce you my favourite Cd Ripper.
 WinDuckŪ is a very simple CD Ripper (very small, only 800 kb); arisen to create excellent quality Mp3 in a simple and fast way exploiting library Lame_Enc.dll. Naturally WinDuck support: - ID3 Tag v1 & v2 - Freedb.org for to receive and send the data of ours Audio Cd - automatic create folder and file names Main advantages: - not require ASPI Manager - not require installation (enought unzip WinDuck.exe & WinDuck.exe.manifest in a folder) - very easy to be used - full support Lame Encoder (vbrMode, Preset, etc.) - it will be enough to replace the new version of the Lame Encoder to have an always up-to-date program ...and obviously free!  Enjoy! This is the link to download it 
This post has been edited by Dr. Oviri: Sep 30 2007, 00:02 |
 |
 
|
|
Apr 6 2007, 05:11
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 92 Joined: 19-July 03 Member No.: 7866 |
Thank you very much. This ripper works as it should, easily. Nice looking program as well.
cheers, herefornow -------------------- cast out...
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2007, 08:12
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 487 Joined: 5-August 02 From: Manila Member No.: 2939 |
foobar2000, and eac have secure ripping and are also free. and foobar2000, as a cd ripper, is VERY easy to use as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2007, 10:28
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 139 Joined: 21-March 07 Member No.: 41686 |
I am not in competition with Weithoff or Pawloski
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2007, 13:50
Post
#5
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 492 Joined: 5-January 06 From: Dublin Member No.: 26898 |
Crashes at runtime on my WinXP machine:
  Looks promising though! |
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2007, 14:39
Post
#6
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 446 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 34002 |
you stole audiograbber's "rip" icon
-------------------- err... i'm not using windows any more ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2007, 15:56
Post
#7
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 144 Joined: 7-April 04 From: Florida Member No.: 13283 |
QUOTE (...Just Elliott @ Apr 6 2007, 08:39)  you stole audiograbber's "rip" icon Maybe he was merely inspired by said icon?
-------------------- "The way we see our world is better than yours."
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2007, 17:24
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 139 Joined: 21-March 07 Member No.: 41686 |
QUOTE (DickxLaurent @ Apr 6 2007, 16:56) you stole audiograbber's "rip" icon Very similar In my PC (98/ME/NT/XP/2000) it work fine
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 7 2007, 13:11
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 139 Joined: 21-March 07 Member No.: 41686 |
StrictISO and NoBitReservoir have not seen in other CD Ripper
  WinDuck is simply the best Please, no comparison with EAC, AudioGrabber, CDex, etc.
This post has been edited by Dr. Oviri: Apr 7 2007, 13:12 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 7 2007, 21:27
Post
#10
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 10-January 06 From: Zagreb Member No.: 27018 |
QUOTE (Dr. Oviri @ Apr 6 2007, 03:35) This is the link to download it It is not. Nothing there. Please, host it on Rapidshare or some similar download service. If you want, I can host it, I have premium account, so it won't be deleted soon. H. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 04:37
Post
#11
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1190 Joined: 12-January 06 From: Cambridge, MA Member No.: 27052 |
QUOTE (Dr. Oviri @ Apr 7 2007, 18:11) WinDuck is simply the best Please, no comparison with EAC, AudioGrabber, CDex, etc. I'm sorry but i don't follow the logic here. So you don't want your program to be compared to either EAC or CDex or even foobar's secure ripper, but claim that your program is the best? Isn't that like saying my program is best if you don't compare it with programs that could be/are better than it? |
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 05:34
Post
#12
|
|
|
TAK Developer Group: Developer Posts: 1043 Joined: 1-April 06 Member No.: 29051 |
QUOTE (kanak @ Apr 8 2007, 04:37) QUOTE (Dr. Oviri @ Apr 7 2007, 18:11) WinDuck is simply the best Please, no comparison with EAC, AudioGrabber, CDex, etc. I'm sorry but i don't follow the logic here. So you don't want your program to be compared to either EAC or CDex or even foobar's secure ripper, but claim that your program is the best? Isn't that like saying my program is best if you don't compare it with programs that could be/are better than it? Possibly he wanted to say, that his program is meant for different user groups or requirements and can not be compared with the big ones. I myself am also using some similar software, small and easy to use, sufficient for a rip now and then but not the best choice for mass backups or if highest data integrity is required. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 06:43
Post
#13
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 139 Joined: 21-March 07 Member No.: 41686 |
QUOTE (kanak @ Apr 8 2007, 05:37) I'm sorry but i don't follow the logic here. So you don't want your program to be compared to either EAC or CDex or even foobar's secure ripper, but claim that your program is the best? Isn't that like saying my program is best if you don't compare it with programs that could be/are better than it? Thomas has understood the "concept" WinDuck support only Mp3 and Wave but better than others CD Ripper
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 06:55
Post
#14
|
|
 Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4887 Joined: 12-August 04 From: Exeter, UK Member No.: 16217 |
Thanks for this.
QUOTE (Dr. Oviri @ Apr 8 2007, 06:43) WinDuck support only Mp3 and Wave but better than others CD Ripper Can you elaborate?
-------------------- I'm on a horse.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 06:58
Post
#15
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 487 Joined: 5-August 02 From: Manila Member No.: 2939 |
QUOTE (TBeck @ Apr 8 2007, 12:34) QUOTE (kanak @ Apr 8 2007, 04:37) QUOTE (Dr. Oviri @ Apr 7 2007, 18:11) WinDuck is simply the best Please, no comparison with EAC, AudioGrabber, CDex, etc. I'm sorry but i don't follow the logic here. So you don't want your program to be compared to either EAC or CDex or even foobar's secure ripper, but claim that your program is the best? Isn't that like saying my program is best if you don't compare it with programs that could be/are better than it? Possibly he wanted to say, that his program is meant for different user groups or requirements and can not be compared with the big ones. I myself am also using some similar software, small and easy to use, sufficient for a rip now and then but not the best choice for mass backups or if highest data integrity is required. it may win in the size the department but cdex, bonkenc, and foobar2000 are just as easy to use in my opinion. and lame with foobar2000 is far more easier since it only involves a quality slider. there are no other options that may screw up quality. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 07:01
Post
#16
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4887 Joined: 12-August 04 From: Exeter, UK Member No.: 16217 |
QUOTE (Dr. Oviri @ Apr 6 2007, 03:35) - not require installation (enought unzip WinDuck.exe & WinDuck.exe.manifest in a folder) Does it write to the registry or anyhting. I.e.: could you use this on a USB pen and take yor settings with you?QUOTE (Dr. Oviri @ Apr 6 2007, 03:35) This is the link to download it NB: As per your other link, I had to copy'n'paste the URL to access the file. Your host must have some hotlinking thing going on. If posting to the forum you may do best to link to a page that has a link to the file.
-------------------- I'm on a horse.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2007, 07:31
Post
#17
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 139 Joined: 21-March 07 Member No.: 41686 |
QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Apr 8 2007, 07:55) Can you elaborate? No, read the documentation of Lame Altervista has some problems for download some file  I have arranged the link Enjoy! QUOTE (Synthetic Soul @ Apr 8 2007, 08:01) Does it write to the registry or anyhting. I.e.: could you use this on a USB pen and take yor settings with you? Yes, options are written in the register but can also work from a floppy disk or a USB pen
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2007, 08:32
Post
#18
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4887 Joined: 12-August 04 From: Exeter, UK Member No.: 16217 |
QUOTE (Dr. Oviri @ Apr 9 2007, 07:31) No, read the documentation of Lame OK, I'll take that as a no.QUOTE (Dr. Oviri @ Apr 9 2007, 07:31) Yes, options are written in the register but can also work from a floppy disk or a USB pen I think it would be nice if it used an INI instead, so that the app and settings were transferrable on USB pen. I guess there's always foobar.
-------------------- I'm on a horse.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2007, 21:28
Post
#19
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 139 Joined: 21-March 07 Member No.: 41686 |
A true programmer has not used INI files for at least six years
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2007, 21:45
Post
#20
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4887 Joined: 12-August 04 From: Exeter, UK Member No.: 16217 |
 OK, maybe I was being a bit nineties. I apologise if I offended your programming sensibilities.How about you make a leap of faith and think of "INI" as "a file-based config file"? XML, text, binary, anything you like - just something that I can put on a USB pen. -------------------- I'm on a horse.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2007, 22:37
Post
#21
|
|
|
Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2332 Joined: 28-June 02 From: Argentina Member No.: 2425 |
QUOTE (Dr. Oviri @ Apr 9 2007, 20:28) A true programmer has not used INI files for at least six years i think that ss is right ... what advantages does the registry offer over the INI? none ... an vice versa? you can transport your settings with you. I would always prefer a local INI over the windows registry. -------------------- MAREO: http://www.webearce.com.ar
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2007, 23:00
Post
#22
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4887 Joined: 12-August 04 From: Exeter, UK Member No.: 16217 |
QUOTE (kwanbis @ Apr 9 2007, 22:37) i think that ss is right ... what advantages does the registry offer over the INI? none ... an vice versa? you can transport your settings with you. Yeah, I'm just kinda thinking that the main benefit that WinDuck has is that it does not need to be installed, and is quite small in size. People aren't going to replace EAC, foobar or even CDEx with WinDuck, but maybe it could be useful to keep a small, simple ripper on a USB pen - but that means the settings as well. I like it when apps don't install and/or mess with the registry; INI/config files are ace.I would always prefer a local INI over the windows registry. I don't really get the chance to use it now, but I have mentioned before that I find it quite interesting that Microsoft reverted to the app.config file and XML settings files with .NET. -------------------- I'm on a horse.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 10 2007, 04:23
Post
#23
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 139 Joined: 21-March 07 Member No.: 41686 |
QUOTE (kwanbis @ Apr 9 2007, 23:37) i think that ss is right ... what advantages does the registry offer over the INI? none ... an vice versa? you can transport your settings with you. An INI file is more visible and the user could modify the present values in a not very appropriate way ... The Registry is more secure... If you really want can you export the settings to the HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Oviri Systems\WinDuck key and save everything in a *.reg file, not?
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 10 2007, 05:34
Post
#24
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1234 Joined: 5-October 01 Member No.: 220 |
EAC uses .cfg files to save it's settings anyway.
One of the Lame devs once gave an exmaple of what a Lame GUI should look like & it didn't look like that. This post has been edited by westgroveg: Apr 10 2007, 05:36 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 10 2007, 07:06
Post
#25
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 2019 Joined: 8-April 05 From: Cincinnati, OH Member No.: 21277 |
Downloaded it, ran it, and was impressed that I didn't have to install anything and it fit on my USB drive. Then again, I also had the non-install version of EAC on there as well. Still, I thought it was a very nice introductory program for people who are really on the go and don't have the time/space to install CD rippers and get them properly configured. I could have used this back "in the year 2000" when I had a 32MB thumb drive that was $120 and I used three different computers for my audio purposes. Now I am a bit more grounded and use one.
A nice little program though, I hope to see some semi-secure ripping updates in the future to compete with some other popular rippers. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th May 2013 - 03:43 |
