LAME 3.97b2, New beta release |
  |
LAME 3.97b2, New beta release |
 Nov 27 2005, 02:52
Post
#1
|
|
 Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81  |
Gabriel Bouvigne just commited LAME 3.97 beta 2 to the CVS repository.
Quoting him: "There are only a few changes compared to b1, so I think that we should be able to release 3.97 soon." http://lame.sourceforge.net/ Binaries are available at RareWares. This post has been edited by rjamorim: Nov 28 2005, 00:10 -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
 |
 
|
|
Nov 27 2005, 02:59
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 3474 Joined: 7-November 01 From: Strasbourg (France) Member No.: 420 |
QUOTE (rjamorim @ Nov 27 2005, 02:52 AM) Could someone wake up John33? 
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 27 2005, 03:04
Post
#3
|
|
|
Rarewares admin Group: Members Posts: 7515 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Brazil Member No.: 81 |
Here's a stop-gap compile for win32 until John compiles proper, ICL-optimized binaries:
http://www.rarewares.org/rja/Lame-Win32-3.97b2.zip -------------------- Get up-to-date binaries of Lame, AAC, Vorbis and much more at RareWares:
http://www.rarewares.org |
|
|
|
|
Nov 27 2005, 06:06
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 24-May 04 Member No.: 14290 |
I noticed slight modification on V5 ATHaa sensitivity.
from presets.c (line 370, 388) Lame 3.97b1 V5 athaa_sensitivity = -16 Lame 3.97b2 V5 athaa_sensitivity = -12 This post has been edited by ysoya: Nov 27 2005, 06:07 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 27 2005, 13:01
Post
#5
|
|
 xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
The base compile is now at Rarewares MP3 page. The other compiles will follow.
 If I have understood communications on the lame-dev mailing list correctly, this beta may change a little later after Gabriel has backported some stuff from the CVS head (ie., the alpha). -------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
|
Nov 27 2005, 13:28
Post
#6
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 324 Joined: 26-June 02 From: Marseille,France Member No.: 2400 |
AS switch has been reintroduced in the cli...good to know.
-------------------- http://www.unite-video.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=5412 :: An overview of all lossless Audio Formats (in french language ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 27 2005, 13:45
Post
#7
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 72 Joined: 11-November 01 From: Hong Kong Member No.: 437 |
QUOTE (john33 @ Nov 27 2005, 09:01 PM) The base compile is now at Rarewares MP3 page. The other compiles will follow. If I have understood communications on the lame-dev mailing list correctly, this beta may change a little later after Gabriel has backported some stuff from the CVS head (ie., the alpha).  lameACM.acm of beta 2 is 181 KB while lameACM.acm of beta 1 is 269 KB. Is the size difference normal? 
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 27 2005, 14:32
Post
#8
|
|
|
xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
QUOTE (jkml @ Nov 27 2005, 12:45 PM) lameACM.acm of beta 2 is 181 KB while lameACM.acm of beta 1 is 269 KB. Is the size difference normal? The difference is due to the b2 ACM compile being an MSVC6 one rather than the ICL9.0 of b1. It seemed from the lame mailing lists that people were having difficulties with the ICL compile so I thought it was worth trying a standard VC6 version. -------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 01:14
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 28-November 05 Member No.: 26047 |
Hi,
Is there a apt-key signature key for your debian RareWare repositories. I'm using sid and I can just use --allow-unauthenticated with apt-get but I like to use aptitude and it just looks ugly with all those U's splattered all over the place.thanks |
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 04:25
Post
#10
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 15-December 03 Member No.: 10468 |
QUOTE (john33 @ Nov 27 2005, 04:01 AM) The base compile is now at Rarewares MP3 page. The other compiles will follow. If I have understood communications on the lame-dev mailing list correctly, this beta may change a little later after Gabriel has backported some stuff from the CVS head (ie., the alpha). Looking forward to the version with the INI setup. 
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 10:34
Post
#11
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 131 Joined: 6-March 03 Member No.: 5359 |
Another step towards a stable new lame version
I'm looking forward to that, since all linux distributions will update lame too. I know, I could compile it myself, but since I'm rather lazy... 
-------------------- A secure audio ripper for linux: code.google.com/p/rubyripper
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 11:12
Post
#12
|
|
|
xcLame and OggDropXPd Developer Group: Developer Posts: 3708 Joined: 30-September 01 From: Bracknell, UK Member No.: 111 |
I will post a 'final' beta, plus derivative compiles, once the beta 2 version is announced at Sourceforge. Only then can we be sure that we have the full beta 2 release.
-------------------- John
---------------------------------------------------------------- My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/ |
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 13:13
Post
#13
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 410 Joined: 20-October 04 From: UK Member No.: 17750 |
QUOTE (rjamorim @ Nov 27 2005, 01:52 AM) Quoting him: "There are only a few changes compared to b1, so I think that we should be able to release 3.97 soon." I think it's always useful to detail the changes made for any software update. I'm sure it's detailed in the lame cvs (somewhere), but since you went to the effort to tell us about the update, it would've been nice to have stated the changes made in the same post. Or maybe Gabriel could/should do that? -------------------- http://www.health4ni.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 13:26
Post
#14
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1046 Joined: 28-June 03 From: on the dock of the bay Member No.: 7423 |
QUOTE (jaybeee @ Nov 28 2005, 01:13 PM) I think it's always useful to detail the changes made for any software update. I guess Roberto also doesn't know what the changes are (yet), otherwise he probably would have written them down.I'm sure it's detailed in the lame cvs (somewhere), but since you went to the effort to tell us about the update, it would've been nice to have stated the changes made in the same post. Or maybe Gabriel could/should do that? I'll glady see a newsflash with just some notes or brief descriptions rather than no news at all as far as I am concerned
-------------------- Nothing but a Heartache - Since I found my Baby ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 13:32
Post
#15
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 410 Joined: 20-October 04 From: UK Member No.: 17750 |
QUOTE (Digga @ Nov 28 2005, 12:26 PM) I'll glady see a newsflash with just some notes or brief descriptions rather than no news at all as far as I am concerned Agree, and I'm not saying we shouldn't have had any update. Thanks to Roberto for posting. Just a prompt really for someone to update it with the changes that's all
-------------------- http://www.health4ni.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 13:36
Post
#16
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1303 Joined: 14-September 05 From: Helsinki, Finland Member No.: 24472 |
From another thread:
QUOTE (markanini @ Nov 28 2005, 03:50 AM) @halb27:
You may find the information here of intrest to you: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*che...y.html?rev=HEAD QUOTE LAME 3.97 beta 2 November 26 2005 * Gabriel Bouvigne: o Fixed an initialization error when input is not using a standard sampling frequency o Fixed a possible assertion failure in very low bitrate encoding o Slight change regarding ATH adjustment with V5 o Reinstated bit reservoir for 320kbps CBR o ReplayGain analysis should now be faster when encountering silent parts * Takehiro Tominaga: o Fixed a possible link problem of assembly code -------------------- http://listening-tests.freetzi.com
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 14:12
Post
#17
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2259 Joined: 9-October 05 From: Dormagen, Germany Member No.: 25015 |
QUOTE (Alex B @ Nov 28 2005, 02:36 PM) @halb27: .... Reinstated bit reservoir for 320kbps CBR ... Thank you, grreat news. -------------------- lame3100i -V0.5+ --adbr_short 480
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 15:28
Post
#18
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 93 Joined: 19-June 03 From: ARG Member No.: 7291 |
Since LAME 3.97 beta 2 is out, should we use it instead of LAME 3.97 beta 1 or not yet ?
QUOTE LAME 3.97 beta 2 November 26 2005 Gabriel Bouvigne: - Fixed an initialization error when input is not using a standard sampling frequency - Fixed a possible assertion failure in very low bitrate encoding - Slight change regarding ATH adjustment with V5 - Reinstated bit reservoir for 320kbps CBR Takehiro Tominaga: - Fixed a possible link problem of assembly code Gr. -------------------- Greetings
Sonny Burnett. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 15:45
Post
#19
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 439 Joined: 9-February 05 From: county down Member No.: 19713 |
QUOTE (halb27 @ Nov 28 2005, 01:12 PM) QUOTE (Alex B @ Nov 28 2005, 02:36 PM) @halb27: .... Reinstated bit reservoir for 320kbps CBR ... Thank you, grreat news. Congratulations Halb! and +Respect to Gabriel for hacking it out with you and taking it onboard
-------------------- no conscience > no custom
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 15:48
Post
#20
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 873 Joined: 12-October 01 From: the great wide open Member No.: 277 |
I suggest to change the recommnded settings topic & recommnded compiles topic, to recommend now 3.97b2 inseatd of 3.97b1.
-------------------- www.High-Quality.ch.vu -- High Quality Audio Archiving Tutorials
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 16:04
Post
#21
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 70 Joined: 22-April 03 Member No.: 6122 |
QUOTE (user @ Nov 28 2005, 04:48 PM) I suggest to change the recommnded settings topic & recommnded compiles topic, to recommend now 3.97b2 inseatd of 3.97b1. Yes, we should do that. (User: Please answer to my PMs next time.) This post has been edited by Echizen: Nov 28 2005, 16:04 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 16:39
Post
#22
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 873 Joined: 12-October 01 From: the great wide open Member No.: 277 |
QUOTE (Echizen @ Nov 28 2005, 04:04 PM) (User: Please answer to my PMs next time.) Sorry, I answered, when there was time. Unfortunately, we aren't paid for HA-work Changes from various persons were suggested, so I decided to watch the daily or even hourly proposed changes. Now it has settled down a bit, and I have time again for the moment to work on mp3, but the topic is closed and i cannot edit. If the topic is opened for edition of the lame 3.97b2, I will look for incorporation of layout/wording changes, also.
-------------------- www.High-Quality.ch.vu -- High Quality Audio Archiving Tutorials
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 17:46
Post
#23
|
|
 Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 2372 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 3 |
QUOTE (user @ Nov 28 2005, 04:39 PM) If the topic is opened for edition of the lame 3.97b2, I will look for incorporation of layout/wording changes, also. Okay, opened. Please take note of the changes you make so it can be edited in the Wiki as well. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 18:14
Post
#24
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 92 Joined: 19-May 05 Member No.: 22137 |
o ReplayGain analysis should now be faster when encountering silent parts
Maybe related, but awhile ago I created a silent sound file in soundforge and encoded it with: mppenc, LAME, and Nero AAC. I noticed that LAME took approximately 7x longer to encode pure silence than the others. I thought it was a little strange. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2005, 20:09
Post
#25
|
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 2372 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 3 |
QUOTE (Synaptic Line Noise @ Nov 28 2005, 06:14 PM) o ReplayGain analysis should now be faster when encountering silent parts Maybe related, but awhile ago I created a silent sound file in soundforge and encoded it with: mppenc, LAME, and Nero AAC. I noticed that LAME took approximately 7x longer to encode pure silence than the others. I thought it was a little strange. Hehe, maybe it's those denormals again? |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 20:55 |
