lack of compression |
![]() ![]() |
lack of compression |
May 14 2009, 15:28
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 17-April 08 Member No.: 52847 |
experiment:
track: Biosphere - Disparu flac -8 bitrate: 267kbps vorbis aoTuVb5.7 q8(~256kbps) bitrate: 208kbps nero aac q0.66(~250kbps) bitrate: 75kbps vorbis aoTuVb5.7 q9.4(~392kbps) bitrate: 347kbps nero aac q0.97(~400kbps) bitrate: 91kbps This post has been edited by hidn: May 14 2009, 15:35 |
|
|
|
May 14 2009, 15:39
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 325 Joined: 17-October 05 From: United States Member No.: 25178 |
I ... really don't understand what that means. What are you trying to accomplish that produces the above files?
Edit: On further reflection, I think I get it. Adding file sizes to the above results will probably be extremely helpful. I suspect you aren't reporting average bitrate for the produced files. This post has been edited by Tahnru: May 14 2009, 15:42 |
|
|
|
May 14 2009, 15:49
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 17-April 08 Member No.: 52847 |
is the average bitrate
I do not know how it is called. but should be more compressed than cut. (m.b lossless part. i don't know This post has been edited by hidn: May 14 2009, 15:52 |
|
|
|
May 14 2009, 15:54
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 325 Joined: 17-October 05 From: United States Member No.: 25178 |
Do you have file sizes for each file? Also, how long is the track?
|
|
|
|
May 14 2009, 15:57
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 17-April 08 Member No.: 52847 |
146 seconds
|
|
|
|
May 14 2009, 16:01
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3083 Joined: 1-September 05 From: SE Pennsylvania Member No.: 24233 |
If you are asking if there are situations in which lossy compression can be less efficient than lossless compression, then the answer is yes.
|
|
|
|
May 14 2009, 16:04
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 325 Joined: 17-October 05 From: United States Member No.: 25178 |
Given that several media player programs exist that mis-report average bitrates, I think no further insight can be had until we have the files' sizes.
|
|
|
|
May 14 2009, 16:13
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 17-April 08 Member No.: 52847 |
foobar2000. I have already deleted the files and their sizes can not lead.
the average bitrate is correct. You can calculate it by multiplying on the seconds This post has been edited by hidn: May 14 2009, 16:31 |
|
|
|
May 15 2009, 08:46
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 189 Joined: 1-June 03 Member No.: 6945 |
Those are indeed very strange bitrates. What kind of music/sound is it? Can describe the sound? Maybe you can upload a small part of it (<30seconds).
|
|
|
|
May 15 2009, 15:35
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 17-April 08 Member No.: 52847 |
I noticed that some good lossless codecs compress files with low volume. This track is one of them.
file (20 sec.) in lossless vbr because of the heterogeneity of data. in lossy seems that vbr is due only to the use of different cuttings. vorbis bitrate always aligns to the average of the selected level of compression, regardless of the track itself (excluding silence). so I wanted to mention and that is as correct This post has been edited by hidn: May 15 2009, 15:36 |
|
|
|
Jul 1 2009, 01:33
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 17-April 08 Member No.: 52847 |
but in the practical application of aac always sounds like it dry
This post has been edited by hidn: Jul 1 2009, 01:34 |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 11:51 |