Anyone else use 320 kbps mp3's?, n00b here. |
Hydrogenaudio Forum Rules - No Warez. This includes warez links, cracks and/or requests for help in getting illegal software or copyrighted music tracks!
- No Spamming or Trolling on the boards, this includes useless posts, trying to only increase post count or trying to deliberately create a flame war.
- No Hateful or Disrespectful posts. This includes: bashing, name-calling or insults directed at a board member.
- Click here for complete Hydrogenaudio Terms of Service
  |
Anyone else use 320 kbps mp3's?, n00b here. |
 Jul 4 2009, 20:38
Post
#101
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 690 Joined: 22-April 06 Member No.: 29877  |
QUOTE (Rei Murasame @ Jul 4 2009, 20:03)  Well, this one I seemed to be totally unable to distinguish even though you told me it was there. The clipping sound seemed to be about the same loudness to me on the encode, so I had a lot of difficulty telling it apart. Any suggestions on how it could be so elusive? I'm assuming it's just a lack of experience on my part? You have to be very picky and sensitive to precho artifacts on that sample. I have to admit that sample is quite hard to ABX, am surprised i managed to ABX it at 320, with my left ear playing up due to ear wax building up quite bad like it does at every summer, and also not having my headphones on proply to avoid headphone hair. -------------------- "I never thought I'd see this much candy in one mission!"
|
 |
 
|
|
Dec 24 2009, 17:08
Post
#102
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 71 Joined: 24-December 09 From: New York Member No.: 76308 |
Ugh, no way...320kbps cbr is a waste of space. My hearing isn't that good to hear any benefit of such a compression ratio.
-------------------- foobar2000, FLAC, and qAAC -V68
It just works people! |
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2010, 09:40
Post
#103
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 8-April 10 Member No.: 79694 |
I did the test and I actually pick the V7 file over V6, V5, V4, V3,...does this mean legal tone deaf?
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2010, 17:46
Post
#104
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 512 Joined: 18-January 04 From: bethlehem.pa.us Member No.: 11318 |
No, it means you can fit more music on your device, since you can create smaller encodes!
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2010, 23:38
Post
#105
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 143 Joined: 29-December 05 Member No.: 26719 |
QUOTE (Zarggg @ Apr 8 2010, 12:46) No, it means you can fit more music on your device, since you can create smaller encodes! This would only be true if the rest of his/her collection is similar to the tracks he/she tested. Make sure to test using the different styles of music that are representative of your collection. |
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2012, 04:21
Post
#106
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 22-August 12 Member No.: 102554 |
Wow.
Even here. Brilliant. Maybe you should ask, what is the specifications of the SOURCE recording format from which the mp3 is derived? I don't know, you can call me crazy now. JohnnyL |
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2012, 12:08
Post
#107
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4330 Joined: 23-June 06 Member No.: 32180 |
Even if we wanted to, first we’d need to have the faintest idea of what you’re talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2012, 16:08
Post
#108
|
|
 Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 1442 Joined: 11-February 03 From: Vermont Member No.: 4955 |
QUOTE (smok3 @ Jul 31 2008, 05:09) point would be: a. to support lazy users which can't download standalone client (you could make it so that files are loaded depending on GET data), so single clicked link would be all that is required... example: abx.org/abx.php?file1=http://someplace.org/1.mp3&file2=http://someplace.org/2.mp3 b. to support users which use some other OS c. somebody with good knowhow could make this probably more secure than offline version could ever be It would cater to people who, for whatever reason, are not allowed to install programs on the computer they use. |
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2012, 16:21
Post
#109
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 431 Joined: 11-February 12 Member No.: 97076 |
QUOTE (DonP @ Aug 22 2012, 08:08) It would cater to people who, for whatever reason, are not allowed to install programs on the computer they use. foobar2000 portable works flawlessly. This post has been edited by eahm: Aug 22 2012, 16:22 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2012, 16:57
Post
#110
|
|
 Group: Super Moderator Posts: 9258 Joined: 1-April 04 Member No.: 13167 |
Great, now that this thread has been brought back from two-and-a-half-year slumber by a first-time poster who couldn't seem to manage to make a coherent point the rest of you pile-on.
It is clear that the author of the last post didn't even bother to check the context of what was being said before posting, potentially dragging this discussion off-topic. Do I close it now or will you people exercise a little care before posting? -------------------- Everything sounds the same until it is proven otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2012, 17:00
Post
#111
|
|
|
Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 2332 Joined: 28-June 02 From: Argentina Member No.: 2425 |
Close it.
-------------------- MAREO: http://www.webearce.com.ar
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2012, 17:09
Post
#112
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 9258 Joined: 1-April 04 Member No.: 13167 |
You're right; besides, the poll has run its course.
-------------------- Everything sounds the same until it is proven otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 21:21 |
