Magazine "double blind" tests Apple's DRM and unDRM' |
![]() ![]() |
Magazine "double blind" tests Apple's DRM and unDRM' |
Jun 1 2007, 20:26
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 16 Joined: 13-November 04 Member No.: 18120 |
Serious issues with the "metodology", I'd say.
MaximumPC article |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 20:35
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 3353 Joined: 6-July 03 From: Sachsen (DE) Member No.: 7609 |
Oh dear, where to start? 10 Subjects, 1 Trial? Preference between two tracks? Its nice to see that doubleblind-methodology spreads, but unfortunatelly, these results simply have no significant meanings at all. If you go already to through the hassle of DBT, then why not do your homework completely, so that the effort isnt spent in vain?
- Lyx This post has been edited by Lyx: Jun 1 2007, 20:35 |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2007, 21:17
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2019 Joined: 8-April 05 From: Cincinnati, OH Member No.: 21277 |
Yeah, I read that article. I too questioned the testing methodology especially since many people could "hear" a difference between the 128kbps AAC and 256kbps AAC files using the stock Apple earbuds. I call BS on that one.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2013 - 05:58 |