IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
foo_input_tak, TAK decoder
TBeck
post Apr 21 2007, 19:19
Post #51


TAK Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 1072
Joined: 1-April 06
Member No.: 29051



QUOTE (yerma @ Apr 21 2007, 17:33) *
As I said, I will happily test it on monday, as I have no multicore machine within reach until then.

Fine!

I am happy, that Kanak has reported success with the new library (in the TAK Decoding library 1.0.3-thread). Hopefully it will work for you too.

Thomas

This post has been edited by TBeck: Apr 21 2007, 19:22
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Squeller
post Apr 21 2007, 22:09
Post #52





Group: Members
Posts: 2340
Joined: 28-August 02
Member No.: 3218



With your new decoding library, the (dynamic) bitrate shows up as being around 1600 kbps...
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TBeck
post Apr 21 2007, 23:22
Post #53


TAK Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 1072
Joined: 1-April 06
Member No.: 29051



TAK Decoding library 1.0.4

is out: TAK Decoding library 1.0.4

QUOTE (Squeller @ Apr 21 2007, 22:09) *
With your new decoding library, the (dynamic) bitrate shows up as being around 1600 kbps...

That's very strange. I haven't touched any code involved into the decoding itself. Which library version have you been using before? Can anyone else confirm this observation?

Added:

One possible explaination: The affected file is 24-bit and you have been using the decoding library V1.0.1 before, which reported wrong bit rates for 24-bit files.

This post has been edited by TBeck: Apr 21 2007, 23:38
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gnerma
post Apr 22 2007, 03:20
Post #54





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 89
Joined: 6-August 03
From: Bakersfield, CA
Member No.: 8203



I've got a possible bug for you foosion. After updating the tags of a file through foobar, the second compression delineation (extra or max) disappears. For example a file that was displaying "normal max" will only display "normal" after a tag update. This is in the foobar properties page.

Can anybody confirm this one?

Also, I think this has already been mentioned but you can't seem to update the tags of a cue index number that is currently being played back.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kanak
post Apr 22 2007, 04:39
Post #55





Group: Members
Posts: 1190
Joined: 12-January 06
From: Cambridge, MA
Member No.: 27052



QUOTE (TBeck @ Apr 21 2007, 17:22) *
QUOTE (Squeller @ Apr 21 2007, 22:09) *

With your new decoding library, the (dynamic) bitrate shows up as being around 1600 kbps...

That's very strange. I haven't touched any code involved into the decoding itself. Which library version have you been using before? Can anyone else confirm this observation?


No such problems here. Tried it with both 1.0.4.0 and 1.0.3.0 no such problems (16-bit files only- i don't have any 24-bit files).



QUOTE (Gnerma @ Apr 21 2007, 21:20) *
I've got a possible bug for you foosion. After updating the tags of a file through foobar, the second compression delineation (extra or max) disappears. For example a file that was displaying "normal max" will only display "normal" after a tag update. This is in the foobar properties page.


Same here. The problem is replicable.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
yerma
post Apr 23 2007, 10:45
Post #56





Group: Members
Posts: 61
Joined: 21-February 07
From: Graz, Austria
Member No.: 40824



As promised, I tested the new decoding library. 535 files, around 13GB, converting and replaygaining went fine. No crash, no errors. Yay! laugh.gif

Good work! biggrin.gif

Edit:
QUOTE (Gnerma @ Apr 22 2007, 04:20) *
Can anybody confirm this one?
Confirmed.

This post has been edited by yerma: Apr 23 2007, 11:22
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Squeller
post Apr 23 2007, 13:23
Post #57





Group: Members
Posts: 2340
Joined: 28-August 02
Member No.: 3218



QUOTE (TBeck @ Apr 21 2007, 14:22) *
That's very strange. I haven't touched any code involved into the decoding itself. Which library version have you been using before? Can anyone else confirm this observation?
Arggl. I answered yesterday, unfortunately my answer isn't here. HA was unresponsive for some minutes...

Very short answer: My time is low, I can't prove it any more as I've deleted the (tak 1.01) files. I don't know wether it was the files or the decoder. Now with 1.04 decoder I don't see the problem again, let's assume anything is fine smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Spirit_of_the_oc...
post Apr 23 2007, 16:51
Post #58





Group: Members
Posts: 583
Joined: 12-September 06
Member No.: 35092



Could someone create a TAK Icon that fits to the default foobar fileicons?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
urlwolf
post Apr 23 2007, 19:35
Post #59





Group: Members
Posts: 143
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 10903



foobar 9.4.3 hungs when I try to play a tak file.
Mycomponents:
CODE
Core (2007-04-20 21:36:34)
    foobar2000 core 0.9.4.3
foo_abx.dll (2007-04-20 21:35:00)
    ABX Comparator 1.3.1
foo_albumlist.dll (2007-04-20 21:34:58)
    Album List 3.2.0
foo_audioscrobbler.dll (2006-09-14 00:20:40)
    Audioscrobbler 2.1
foo_cdda.dll (2007-04-20 21:34:44)
    CD Audio Decoder 2.1.1
foo_converter.dll (2007-04-20 21:34:28)
    Converter 1.0.1
foo_dockable_panels.dll (2007-03-28 09:19:02)
    Dockable Panels 1.0.7b [Mar 28 2007 - 09:18:48]
foo_dsp_src9.dll (2006-06-05 20:48:38)
    Resampler (Secret Rabbit Code) 1.03
foo_dsp_std.dll (2007-01-20 01:36:56)
    Standard DSP array 1.0
foo_dsp_winamp.dll (2006-07-30 13:01:18)
    Winamp DSP Bridge 1.4.1
foo_freedb2.dll (2006-08-29 20:43:04)
    freedb Tagger 0.5.2a
foo_input_monkey.dll (2006-08-04 21:57:18)
    Monkey's Audio decoder 2.1.1
foo_input_std.dll (2007-04-20 21:34:22)
    FLAC Decoder 1.1.0
    Standard Input Array 1.0
    WMA Decoder 1.1
foo_input_tak.dll (2007-04-19 00:24:04)
    TAK Decoder 0.3.1
foo_masstag.dll (2007-04-20 21:33:44)
    Masstagger 1.6
foo_out_ks.dll (2006-08-04 21:54:58)
    Kernel Streaming Output 1.2.2
foo_playcount.dll (2006-09-16 17:55:54)
    Playback Statistics 1.3.2
foo_rating.dll (2007-02-28 00:52:46)
    Foo_Rating BETA 2.1
foo_rgscan.dll (2007-04-20 21:33:22)
    ReplayGain Scanner 2.0.2
foo_run.dll (2006-06-15 22:08:10)
    Run services 0.3.2
foo_sic.dll (2007-01-08 11:52:52)
    foosic music database 1.0 beta 12
foo_ui_columns.dll (2006-11-22 14:05:24)
    Columns UI 0.1.3 beta 1v7
foo_ui_std.dll (2007-04-20 21:33:14)
    Default User Interface 0.9acc
foo_uie_albumart.dll (2007-01-15 17:04:44)
    Album Art Panel 0.2.6
foo_uie_quicksearch.dll (2007-01-03 14:18:46)
    Quick Search Toolbar 2.8k
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TBeck
post Apr 23 2007, 21:32
Post #60


TAK Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 1072
Joined: 1-April 06
Member No.: 29051



QUOTE (kanak @ Apr 22 2007, 04:39) *
QUOTE (TBeck @ Apr 21 2007, 17:22) *

QUOTE (Squeller @ Apr 21 2007, 22:09) *

With your new decoding library, the (dynamic) bitrate shows up as being around 1600 kbps...

That's very strange. I haven't touched any code involved into the decoding itself. Which library version have you been using before? Can anyone else confirm this observation?


No such problems here. Tried it with both 1.0.4.0 and 1.0.3.0 no such problems (16-bit files only- i don't have any 24-bit files).

QUOTE (yerma @ Apr 23 2007, 10:45) *
As promised, I tested the new decoding library. 535 files, around 13GB, converting and replaygaining went fine. No crash, no errors. Yay! laugh.gif

Good work! biggrin.gif

Very good news. Thank you both!

Probably i will soon officially replace the decoding library 1.0.2 with 1.04.

QUOTE (Squeller @ Apr 23 2007, 13:23) *
QUOTE (TBeck @ Apr 21 2007, 14:22) *
That's very strange. I haven't touched any code involved into the decoding itself. Which library version have you been using before? Can anyone else confirm this observation?
Arggl. I answered yesterday, unfortunately my answer isn't here. HA was unresponsive for some minutes...

Very short answer: My time is low, I can't prove it any more as I've deleted the (tak 1.01) files. I don't know wether it was the files or the decoder. Now with 1.04 decoder I don't see the problem again, let's assume anything is fine smile.gif

Thanks for the update. I am very confident, that this wasn't a bug.

QUOTE (Spirit_of_the_ocean @ Apr 23 2007, 16:51) *
Could someone create a TAK Icon that fits to the default foobar fileicons?

This isn't easy, because i have not choosen a official logo for TAK yet...

QUOTE (urlwolf @ Apr 23 2007, 19:35) *
foobar 9.4.3 hungs when I try to play a tak file.
...

Could you please provide a bit more info:

1) Does this happen with any TAK file? If only selected files are affected, is the crash reproducable?

2) Is it crashing immediately?

3) Are you using a multi-core sytem?

Thomas
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
manoa
post Apr 24 2007, 03:07
Post #61





Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 24-April 07
Member No.: 42826



is there a Tak Decode plugin for foobar version 0.8.3 (or pre 0.9) ?
there is an error loading the plugin says "file missing shared.dll" when trying to load in version 0.3.1 of the plugin.

This post has been edited by manoa: Apr 24 2007, 03:10
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kanak
post Apr 24 2007, 03:34
Post #62





Group: Members
Posts: 1190
Joined: 12-January 06
From: Cambridge, MA
Member No.: 27052



QUOTE (manoa @ Apr 23 2007, 21:07) *
is there a Tak Decode plugin for foobar version 0.8.3 (or pre 0.9) ?

No

QUOTE (manoa @ Apr 23 2007, 21:07) *
there is an error loading the plugin says "file missing shared.dll" when trying to load in version 0.3.1 of the plugin.

You're missing the shared.dll file that should be in the foobar2000 folder.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
manoa
post Apr 24 2007, 07:00
Post #63





Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 24-April 07
Member No.: 42826



"this component appears to have been built with a newer version of foobar2000..."
after copying the shared.dll from foobar 0.9 to foobar 0.8.3 directory the plugin still does not work.

so does anyone know where, in the DLL or the EXE I can find the version number to make it think that it is the right version ?

or which lines I should skip in ollydbg to make sure it doesn't check for the version ?

This post has been edited by manoa: Apr 24 2007, 07:01
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kanak
post Apr 24 2007, 07:06
Post #64





Group: Members
Posts: 1190
Joined: 12-January 06
From: Cambridge, MA
Member No.: 27052



QUOTE (manoa @ Apr 24 2007, 01:00) *
"this component appears to have been built with a newer version of foobar2000..."
after copying the shared.dll from foobar 0.9 to foobar 0.8.3 directory the plugin still does not work.

so does anyone know where, in the DLL or the EXE I can find the version number to make it think that it is the right version ?

or which lines I should skip in ollydbg to make sure it doesn't check for the version ?


Wait i thought you were trying in foobar 0.9. No amount of voodoo will make the plugin work in 0.8x
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A_Man_Eating_Duc...
post Apr 24 2007, 10:46
Post #65





Group: Members
Posts: 841
Joined: 21-December 01
From: New Zealand
Member No.: 705



QUOTE (manoa @ Apr 24 2007, 18:00) *
"this component appears to have been built with a newer version of foobar2000..."
after copying the shared.dll from foobar 0.9 to foobar 0.8.3 directory the plugin still does not work.

so does anyone know where, in the DLL or the EXE I can find the version number to make it think that it is the right version ?

or which lines I should skip in ollydbg to make sure it doesn't check for the version ?


why don't you just update foobar to v0.9?


--------------------
Who are you and how did you get in here ?
I'm a locksmith, I'm a locksmith.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
foosion
post Apr 24 2007, 20:17
Post #66





Group: FB2K Moderator (Donating)
Posts: 4224
Joined: 24-February 03
Member No.: 5153



QUOTE (Gnerma @ Apr 22 2007, 04:20) *
I've got a possible bug for you foosion. After updating the tags of a file through foobar, the second compression delineation (extra or max) disappears. For example a file that was displaying "normal max" will only display "normal" after a tag update. This is in the foobar properties page.

Can anybody confirm this one?

That seems a little strange. I'll look into it when I find some time.

QUOTE (Gnerma @ Apr 22 2007, 04:20) *
Also, I think this has already been mentioned but you can't seem to update the tags of a cue index number that is currently being played back.

Embedded or external cue sheet?

This post has been edited by foosion: Apr 24 2007, 20:18


--------------------
http://foosion.foobar2000.org/ - my components for foobar2000
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gnerma
post Apr 24 2007, 20:23
Post #67





Group: Members (Donating)
Posts: 89
Joined: 6-August 03
From: Bakersfield, CA
Member No.: 8203



QUOTE (foosion @ Apr 24 2007, 12:17) *
Embedded or external cue sheet?

I'm at work right now so I can't double check but I'm 95% sure it was embedded.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
yerma
post May 7 2007, 13:36
Post #68





Group: Members
Posts: 61
Joined: 21-February 07
From: Graz, Austria
Member No.: 40824



I guess I found another bug, this time in foo_input_tak. An album contained 5 tracks of pure silence, one is 20sec long, the others are 30sec long. When trying to convert from FLAC to TAK I get the error message:
CODE
Error flushing file (TAK decoder is in error state) : file://D:\Temp\1996_Distance_14.tak

All conversions (on a multicore-CPU) stop immediately, leaving more broken TAK files behind.

Then I converted the FLAC file to WAV and used TAK's GUI. Conversion went fine. Then I tried to add tags:
CODE
Could not write info (TAK decoder is in error state) to: "D:\Temp\1996_Distance_14.tak"

Adding tags with MP3Tag went fine... crying.gif

Edit: typo

This post has been edited by yerma: May 7 2007, 13:39
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TBeck
post May 7 2007, 22:03
Post #69


TAK Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 1072
Joined: 1-April 06
Member No.: 29051



QUOTE (yerma @ May 7 2007, 13:36) *
...
Then I converted the FLAC file to WAV and used TAK's GUI. Conversion went fine. Then I tried to add tags:
CODE
Could not write info (TAK decoder is in error state) to: "D:\Temp\1996_Distance_14.tak"

Adding tags with MP3Tag went fine... crying.gif

Can you please send me this file (in the form which generates the error: compressed as TAK, without tags) via email? I want to check, if my decoding library is responsible for this error.

Thomas
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
yerma
post May 8 2007, 09:07
Post #70





Group: Members
Posts: 61
Joined: 21-February 07
From: Graz, Austria
Member No.: 40824



QUOTE (TBeck @ May 7 2007, 23:03) *
Can you please send me this file (in the form which generates the error: compressed as TAK, without tags) via email? I want to check, if my decoding library is responsible for this error.
Done. I have sent it to the address on your homepage...
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TBeck
post May 8 2007, 21:13
Post #71


TAK Developer


Group: Developer
Posts: 1072
Joined: 1-April 06
Member No.: 29051



QUOTE (yerma @ May 8 2007, 09:07) *
QUOTE (TBeck @ May 7 2007, 23:03) *

Can you please send me this file (in the form which generates the error: compressed as TAK, without tags) via email? I want to check, if my decoding library is responsible for this error.
Done. I have sent it to the address on your homepage...

Thanks for the file. I have sent it through my decoding library test suite and could find no errors. Probably it's a foo_input_tak issue.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
yerma
post May 9 2007, 11:44
Post #72





Group: Members
Posts: 61
Joined: 21-February 07
From: Graz, Austria
Member No.: 40824



I did some experiments and the error is replicable. The problem arises only when you try to add any kind of tags to a TAK file which contains nothing but silence. Duration seems to be irrelevant, the error occurs with 20, 40, 60 and 80 seconds of silence.

Foosion? Could you look into this?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
foosion
post May 10 2007, 12:34
Post #73





Group: FB2K Moderator (Donating)
Posts: 4224
Joined: 24-February 03
Member No.: 5153



QUOTE (yerma @ May 9 2007, 12:44) *
I did some experiments and the error is replicable. The problem arises only when you try to add any kind of tags to a TAK file which contains nothing but silence. Duration seems to be irrelevant, the error occurs with 20, 40, 60 and 80 seconds of silence.

Foosion? Could you look into this?

That sounds pretty weird. I don't have much time at the moment, but I'll put it on my to-do list.


--------------------
http://foosion.foobar2000.org/ - my components for foobar2000
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GeSomeone
post May 10 2007, 19:10
Post #74





Group: Members
Posts: 915
Joined: 22-October 01
From: the Netherlands
Member No.: 335



An error I noticed, but can not reproduce at the moment. (not sure if it's the plugin or foobar2000)

- wav's to tak (OK)
- tag with foobar2000 0.9.4.3 (still OK)
- replaygain with foobar2000 0.9.4.3 (not OK)

What happened is that the tracks were reported (properties tab foobar) between 14 to 20 samples longer than before. Of course they weren't really longer, so the extra information resulted in a sharp click at the very end of each track.
When I tried to reproduce this later again, it didn't happen. But before that I had 5 albums with clicks (finding out much later). Anyway, I hope this helps to give a clue what's going on.


--------------------
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
aeroman
post May 12 2007, 19:06
Post #75





Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 9-August 06
From: France
Member No.: 33869



Excellent, no problems to report with Rip, Tag and ReplayGain, thanks foosion. smile.gif

If someone looks for an information about this good encoder + a mini How To,

Go there : How To TAK. wink.gif

This post has been edited by aeroman: May 12 2007, 19:37
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 10:57