Error while encoding MP3 using LAME 3.97b2, The error log doesn't tell me much... |
  |
Error while encoding MP3 using LAME 3.97b2, The error log doesn't tell me much... |
 Dec 11 2005, 01:04
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 11-December 05 Member No.: 26343  |
Anytime I try to use LAME 3.97b2 to encode a WAV file, I get this error:
QUOTE Command: C:\Programs\RazorLame\lame3.97b2\lame.exe --preset fast standard "D:\Our Lady Peace - Clumsy - 01 - Superman's Dead.wav" "D:\Our Lady Peace - Clumsy - 01 - Superman's Dead.mp3" LAME 3.97 (beta 2, Nov 29 2005) 32bits (http://www.mp3dev.org/) CPU features: MMX (ASM used), SSE (ASM used) Using polyphase lowpass filter, transition band: 18671 Hz - 19205 Hz Encoding D:\Our Lady Peace - Clumsy - 01 - Superman's Dead.wav to D:\Our Lady Peace - Clumsy - 01 - Superman's Dead.mp3 Encoding as 44.1 kHz VBR(q=2) j-stereo MPEG-1 Layer III (ca. 7.3x) qval=3 RazorLame encountered an unknown message from LAME while trying to encode "D:\Our Lady Peace - Clumsy - 01 - Superman's Dead.wav"! Encoded 0 files in 0:00:45 There was an unexpected LAME message for one file, please check log for error messages. I use "--preset fast standard" to encode What's wrong? |
 |
 
|
|
Dec 11 2005, 01:33
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 92 Joined: 19-July 03 Member No.: 7866 |
recommend going here and reading:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=28124 new encoders have new settings, razor lame is an old frontend. use the new command lines. ex: -V 2 --vbr-new hope this helps. cheers, h -------------------- cast out...
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 11 2005, 05:39
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 2-October 04 Member No.: 17436 |
Maybe, just maybe, the Wiki on LAME should be added something like 'newer versions of LAME isn't compatible w/ old frontends such as RazorLame'...?
Or probably add it somewhere on the 'recommended setting' thread... Seems most problem w/ LAME encoding stems from the use of RazorLame lately... This post has been edited by sh1leshk4: Dec 11 2005, 05:40 |
|
|
|
|
Dec 11 2005, 09:51
Post
#4
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 344 Joined: 8-December 01 From: Indiana, U.S.A. Member No.: 608 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 11 2005, 09:56
Post
#5
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 3353 Joined: 6-July 03 From: Sachsen (DE) Member No.: 7609 |
Use the search function - this has been asked at least 5 times in the last 30days.
-------------------- I am arrogant and I can afford it because I deliver.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 11 2005, 12:10
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 2-October 04 Member No.: 17436 |
QUOTE (Lyx @ Dec 11 2005, 03:56 PM) Use the search function - this has been asked at least 5 times in the last 30days.  Yes, but which one from those posts whose poster is a frequent visitor to the site? Most of them just login and fire away. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 11 2005, 12:27
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3353 Joined: 6-July 03 From: Sachsen (DE) Member No.: 7609 |
QUOTE (sh1leshk4 @ Dec 11 2005, 12:10 PM) QUOTE (Lyx @ Dec 11 2005, 03:56 PM) Use the search function - this has been asked at least 5 times in the last 30days. Yes, but which one from those posts whose poster is a frequent visitor to the site? Most of them just login and fire away. And are unnecessary time-sinks. The time spent with such unnecessary support-requests could better be spent on real needs. edit: Maybe the idea of fighting spammers with a register-delay instead of banning of free mail-services, isn't that bad at all - it would also possibly cause new people to look around a bit before posting. - Lyx This post has been edited by Lyx: Dec 11 2005, 12:29 -------------------- I am arrogant and I can afford it because I deliver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th June 2013 - 06:26 |
