Lame 3.95 vs 3.90.3, ABC/HR test results here only |
  |
Lame 3.95 vs 3.90.3, ABC/HR test results here only |
 Jan 17 2004, 22:25
Post
#51
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 913 Joined: 15-December 01 From: Germany Member No.: 662  |
Tried one of my own samples at preset standard: "Cirillo - Cristallo" from the "Eye Trance 04" sampler. It has a relatively quiet section with sharp attacks which are slightly reverbed.
I blindly ranked 3951 lower but I later tried abxing it against 3903 without getting any significant results (I also felt like I was guessing). I stopped at 3/8. 3903.mp3 ... 635079 bytes 3951.mp3 ... 626224 bytes CODE ABC/HR Version 0.9b, 30 August 2002 Testname: cirillo lame aps test 1R = G:\NewMP3s\lame-aps\cirillo\3951_dec.wav 2L = G:\NewMP3s\lame-aps\cirillo\3903_dec.wav --------------------------------------- General Comments: --------------------------------------- 1R File: G:\NewMP3s\lame-aps\cirillo\3951_dec.wav 1R Rating: 3.0 1R Comment: pre-echo worse than the other sample --------------------------------------- 2L File: G:\NewMP3s\lame-aps\cirillo\3903_dec.wav 2L Rating: 4.0 2L Comment: pre-echo --------------------------------------- ABX Results: Original vs G:\NewMP3s\lame-aps\cirillo\3951_dec.wav 8 out of 8, pval = 0.004 Original vs G:\NewMP3s\lame-aps\cirillo\3903_dec.wav 8 out of 8, pval = 0.004 edit: was missing an "r" This post has been edited by Gecko: Jan 24 2004, 14:37 |
 |
 
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 00:19
Post
#52
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 715 Joined: 22-April 03 From: /dev/null Member No.: 6130 |
QUOTE (ViPER1313 @ Jan 17 2004, 10:49 PM) Testname: BeautySlept --preset standard Where can I get the sample? -------------------- ruxvilti'a
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 19 2004, 00:39
Post
#53
|
|
 Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 3474 Joined: 7-November 01 From: Strasbourg (France) Member No.: 420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 19:45 |
