Well now that Lame 3.93 has been released... |
  |
Well now that Lame 3.93 has been released... |
 Nov 18 2002, 20:47
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 11 Joined: 8-August 02 Member No.: 2984  |
I keep hearing bad things about lame 3.93 and the --alt-presets , now that it's released should I upgrade from 3.92? I encode using --alt-preset cbr 192 . Will using lame 3.93 downgrade the quality at all?
Thx for the replies. 
|
 |
 
|
|
Nov 18 2002, 21:09
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Developer Posts: 2797 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 6 |
Well, I can't say for sure, but I don't think cbr should be any lower quality than before.
It's just that the quality has not been checked. I tried --alt-preset fast standard a little bit, and in some cases the quality was actually higher than before, although the bitrate is also clearly higher. Anyway, it has not been troughly tested. Dibrom has some interesting ideas for the future for mp3. -------------------- Juha Laaksonheimo
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 18 2002, 22:40
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 31 Joined: 12-November 02 Member No.: 3759 |
"Dibrom has some interesting ideas for the future for mp3."
Like what? 
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 18 2002, 22:50
Post
#4
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 933 Joined: 3-June 02 From: USA Member No.: 2204 |
I see that --alt-preset medium is now an option. 3.93 encodes much faster than 3.92, I was used to .7x to .8x speed now it hums along at 1.1 to 1.2x.
-------------------- Complexity of incoherent design.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 18 2002, 22:53
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Developer Posts: 2797 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 6 |
QUOTE (FinCoder @ Nov 18 2002 - 11:40 PM) "Dibrom has some interesting ideas for the future for mp3." Like what? Too early to tell.. Maybe he will tell soon, if there's a possibility for the plans to happen. -------------------- Juha Laaksonheimo
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 19 2002, 00:07
Post
#6
|
|
|
Founder Group: Admin Posts: 2958 Joined: 26-August 02 From: Nottingham, UK Member No.: 1 |
QUOTE (Andavari @ Nov 18 2002 - 02:50 PM) I see that --alt-preset medium is now an option. 3.93 encodes much faster than 3.92, I was used to .7x to .8x speed now it hums along at 1.1 to 1.2x. Just for the record, --alt-preset medium is not something that I created (not to say that it's necessarily bad.. it is also at least based very largely on aps). I haven't tested it on any of the normal test samples or anything that. I believe this is Gabriels creation, and I don't know anything about how he does his testing (ie. What samples he uses, does he do double blind tests, does he get feedback from other people, etc.). Just want to say that, because I think there's going to be some confusion from people about this. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 19 2002, 00:22
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 206 Joined: 16-October 01 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 301 |
What kinds of changes can we expect between 3.93 & 3.94? With all the hub-ub going on over these two releases it isn't quite clear what's going into 3.94 that isn't in 3.93.
-Jeff |
|
|
|
|
Nov 19 2002, 01:22
Post
#8
|
|
|
Founder Group: Admin Posts: 2958 Joined: 26-August 02 From: Nottingham, UK Member No.: 1 |
QUOTE (frozenspeed @ Nov 18 2002 - 04:22 PM) What kinds of changes can we expect between 3.93 & 3.94? With all the hub-ub going on over these two releases it isn't quite clear what's going into 3.94 that isn't in 3.93. -Jeff I have no idea. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 19 2002, 03:09
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Developer Posts: 2797 Joined: 22-September 01 Member No.: 6 |
QUOTE (frozenspeed @ Nov 19 2002 - 01:22 AM) What kinds of changes can we expect between 3.93 & 3.94? With all the hub-ub going on over these two releases it isn't quite clear what's going into 3.94 that isn't in 3.93. -Jeff Well.. you can get somekind of idea if you check this and see what was done for Tak's branch and what was done for the main branch: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs...l.c?sortby=date http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs...e.c?sortby=date http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs...e.c?sortby=date Of course not everything is necessarely going for 3.94.. -------------------- Juha Laaksonheimo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 18:48 |
