Alternatives to subjective listening tests? |
  |
Alternatives to subjective listening tests? |
 May 22 2011, 04:44
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 33 Joined: 2-February 11 Member No.: 87871  |
I know, I know. It's not a good idea. :-)
However, I am working at an audio encoder and I can't test hundreds of files for every minimal change I make. And besides that, I am partially deaf, so it would be pointless anyway. Any suggestion on some software that can help a bit? Open source/publicly available obviously preferred. Thanks |
 |
 
|
|
May 22 2011, 06:54
Post
#2
|
|
 WavPack Developer Group: Developer (Donating) Posts: 1219 Joined: 3-January 02 From: San Francisco CA Member No.: 900 |
This might be what you are looking for.
|
|
|
|
|
May 22 2011, 09:36
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Developer Posts: 618 Joined: 6-December 08 From: Erlangen Germany Member No.: 64012 |
Or google for PQevalAudio. Note that the PEAQ standard which these tools implement have problems with transients and parametric (non-waveform-preserving) audio codecs, so if an ODG gets worse due to an encoder change, it doesn't mean the file actually sounds worse.
Chris -------------------- If I don't reply to your reply, it means I agree with you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 12:58 |
