AAC settings comparable to mp3 --r3mix? |
  |
AAC settings comparable to mp3 --r3mix? |
 Oct 5 2003, 22:26
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 5-October 03 Member No.: 9168  |
Hi All,
I've been using lame --r3mix for all my ripping needs, but I've recently been experimenting with Nero's AAC format, and it looks good. However before I take it up as my new format of choice, I'd like to get some opinion from others. I've been happy with r3mix's quality/size tradeoff (i.e. I can't notice the difference between it and a CD), so what do people think are comparible settings for VBR AAC encoded with Nero? Regards Dave R This post has been edited by AmunRa: Oct 5 2003, 22:27 |
 |
 
|
|
Oct 5 2003, 22:32
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 478 Joined: 22-November 01 From: United Kingdom Member No.: 519 |
Nero's -normal preset will probably suit your needs. It will surely perform even better than --r3mix at comparable filesize.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2003, 22:40
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 10-September 03 Member No.: 8787 |
QUOTE (dologan @ Oct 5 2003, 01:32 PM) Nero's -normal preset will probably suit your needs. It will surely perform even better than --r3mix at comparable filesize. Hey dologan, with "Nero -normal preset" do you mean the "transparent profile"? -------------------- XviD
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2003, 00:42
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members (Donating) Posts: 478 Joined: 22-November 01 From: United Kingdom Member No.: 519 |
QUOTE (maddivx @ Oct 5 2003, 03:40 PM) Hey dologan, with "Nero -normal preset" do you mean the "transparent profile"? Precisely. 
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2003, 00:31
Post
#5
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 391 Joined: 24-December 02 From: Eugene, OR Member No.: 4224 |
Deleted
This post has been edited by torok: Oct 8 2003, 00:32 -------------------- http://www.pkulak.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 13:43 |
