Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Request for test: Lame cbr 128 (Read 11585 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Request for test: Lame cbr 128

Reply #25 –
Quote
It would be helpfull if those sensitive to high freq problems

That's why i posted here my subjective opinion about this issue.
I have believed that you would need some tests to resolve this issue. If i'm not wrong psycoacustics problems are better noticeable with CBR because with VBR the bitrate increment can mask them. So... i think your request for CBR testing is a such case: maybe you think to resolve the problem with CBR and apply later the same tunings for ABR/VBR. If not i can understand the reason of a so little partecipation by the community: here at HA most people don't use CBR.

Regarding "Skipping" artifact, it seems to be another problem reported later by viper.
In these quick tests i've focused my attention ONLY on HF problems.
Quote
Ok, it seems that I mixed 2 problems

No problems
WavPack 4.3 -mfx5
LAME 3.97 -V5 --vbr-new --athaa-sensitivity 1