AccurateRip question, understanding results |
  |
AccurateRip question, understanding results |
 Aug 1 2012, 22:13
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 49 Joined: 13-July 12 From: California Member No.: 101393  |
CODE AccurateRip URL http://www.accuraterip.com/accuraterip/5/f/4/dBAR-009-000f14f5-006c8f37-6409b909.bin 18 AccurateRip reponses found Track 0: unknown (not tracked) Track 1: rip accurate (confidence 51 of 191) [f5562466], DB [f5562466] Track 2: rip accurate (confidence 50 of 189) [c2913230], DB [c2913230] Track 3: rip accurate (confidence 50 of 188) [bfddbede], DB [bfddbede] Track 4: rip accurate (confidence 51 of 187) [5173a8dd], DB [5173a8dd] Track 5: rip accurate (confidence 50 of 190) [2e31e9f4], DB [2e31e9f4] Track 6: rip accurate (confidence 50 of 190) [3f0562f7], DB [3f0562f7] Track 7: rip accurate (confidence 50 of 188) [da8829ce], DB [da8829ce] Track 8: rip accurate (confidence 50 of 188) [1b85d89e], DB [1b85d89e] Track 9: rip accurate (confidence 44 of 180) [3f13c1a2], DB [3f13c1a2] Am I to understand that the reason why the rip is accurate when the confidence is ~ < 25% on each track is because there are large number with same checksum and there are probably more than one CD with same identification? IE maybe a different pressing of same CD? |
 |
 
|
|
Aug 1 2012, 22:14
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Super Moderator Posts: 9268 Joined: 1-April 04 Member No.: 13167 |
Bingo!
-------------------- Everything sounds the same until it is proven otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 2 2012, 00:43
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 358 Joined: 3-April 05 Member No.: 21165 |
Yes and yes. The number on the left is the amount of matching checksums that have been reported to accurate rip.
There is usually a much lower amount of reported checksums to compare on most releases. A confidence of 1 of 1 or 1 of 2 is usually enough for me to feel confident with its accuracy. JXL This post has been edited by JunkieXL: Aug 2 2012, 00:44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 13:12 |
