New to LAME.exe with Windows 7, a Little Help? |
![]() ![]() |
New to LAME.exe with Windows 7, a Little Help? |
Dec 30 2010, 19:59
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 8-September 02 Member No.: 3324 |
I've been using EAC, and Razor LAME for years under XP to take CDs and FLAC files (w/ FLAC Front End) to LAME encoded MP3s without issue.
The problem is under 7 the LAME encoder always returns an error when trying to do the encode. I'm passing the same command line to the LAME.exe as I was under XP so I'm not sure what exactly the issue is? Dose it have something to do with UAC? |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2010, 20:05
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2019 Joined: 8-April 05 From: Cincinnati, OH Member No.: 21277 |
What command line are you using?
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2010, 20:19
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 29-December 10 Member No.: 86913 |
What's the invocation you're using on the command line?
What's the error you're seeing? Powershell or Cmd? |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2010, 07:38
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 8-September 02 Member No.: 3324 |
"--alt-preset extreme %s %d -c -o" is the command I'm trying to use. As it is I don't even get a reply from the LAME exe, just an error from Razor Lame, "unkown error".
Also, to clarify I'm not using this directly via the command line but within Razor Lame and EAC. Honestly its been so long since I set it up I'm not even exactly sure what the all the switches mean anymore Though I'm fairly sure thats the string I used under XP, I just did test encode with some the built in settings in Razor lame and it encoded fine so LAME is functioning properly. Maybe my command string is no longer valid with newer versions of LAME? This post has been edited by Operandi: Dec 31 2010, 07:39 |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2010, 11:34
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 3620 Joined: 14-May 03 From: Bad Herrenalb Member No.: 6613 |
-c and -o are only some flags in the MP3 file, you can even leave them out. --alt-preset extreme I think can be replaced by a -V setting, but the presets are still supported though. %s and %d are Razor Lame variables that represent the source and destination files because Razor Lame does not pipe data to LAME. Why it doesn't work, I don't know. Maybe you have to start Razor Lame with administrative rights?
This post has been edited by Sebastian Mares: Dec 31 2010, 11:35 -------------------- http://listening-tests.hydrogenaudio.org/sebastian/
|
|
|
|
Dec 31 2010, 14:32
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4352 Joined: 23-June 06 Member No.: 32180 |
--alt-preset extreme I think can be replaced by a -V setting, but the presets are still supported though. It’s equivalent to -V0 --vbr-new. Also, LAME versions since 3.98b1 have the latter parameter as default, in which case it can be omitted.
This post has been edited by dv1989: Dec 31 2010, 14:45 |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2010, 19:22
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 83 Joined: 19-November 04 From: Jacksonville, Fl Member No.: 18229 |
I don't know if this will be of much help, but I had a similar problem using AudioGrabber. It would rip the first song, then stop with a memory error. The solution was to uncheck the box, (under Options), that said; "Rip as much as possible to ram."
I'm guessing that Win7 wouldn't allow the program to manage memory. Your problem may be completely different, but the symptom is similar. |
|
|
|
Jan 1 2011, 06:05
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 141 Joined: 22-March 10 From: California Member No.: 79208 |
Razor Lame does not pipe data to LAME. Why it doesn't work, I don't know. Maybe you have to start Razor Lame with administrative rights? Last I checked, Razor Lame hasn't been updated in a long time, and it has become partially incompatible with newer LAME versions. I remember that the histogram doesn't work anymore, unless you use an unofficial hack to bring it back (which simultaneously breaks some other feature, as I recall). Perhaps with the latest LAME and Windows 7, the level of incompatibility has finally reached a tipping point? If you can't find a solution to the problem, you might have better luck with ALL2LAME, for what it's worth. |
|
|
|
Jan 3 2011, 05:34
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 8-September 02 Member No.: 3324 |
Well I took out the "%s" and "%d" and its now working fine.
As long as I still have this thread going is there anything else I should add the string to give me the highest quality VBR MP3 or is "preset extreme" all I need? |
|
|
|
Jan 3 2011, 06:26
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2340 Joined: 28-August 02 Member No.: 3218 |
Well, I'd say: Go lossless as a base and use v2 - v0 für your target devices, which for sure will be transparent for you. So: Everything is fine, yes.
|
|
|
|
Jan 3 2011, 06:47
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 143 Joined: 29-December 05 Member No.: 26719 |
The wiki is always the best place to spend some time reading before posting basic questions. You've never stated which version of LAME you are using, but assuming you are using 3.98 or later
CODE -V 0 would give you the best possible VBR quality, and CODE --preset fast extreme would apply the same algorithm.FWIW, I use VBR quality level 4 with LAME 3.98.4. I can ABX level 5 on some well-known, difficult to encode samples, so I went up to the next number. You can use decimal values as well. |
|
|
|
Jan 3 2011, 15:35
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 3620 Joined: 14-May 03 From: Bad Herrenalb Member No.: 6613 |
Well I took out the "%s" and "%d" and its now working fine. And it's actually encoding?! -------------------- http://listening-tests.hydrogenaudio.org/sebastian/
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2011, 05:35
Post
#13
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 8-September 02 Member No.: 3324 |
Well I took out the "%s" and "%d" and its now working fine. And it's actually encoding?! Its encoding fine. I have RazorLame setup to use the source directory as the output, that may be why. The wiki is always the best place to spend some time reading before posting basic questions. You've never stated which version of LAME you are using, but assuming you are using 3.98 or later CODE -V 0 would give you the best possible VBR quality, and CODE --preset fast extreme would apply the same algorithm.FWIW, I use VBR quality level 4 with LAME 3.98.4. I can ABX level 5 on some well-known, difficult to encode samples, so I went up to the next number. You can use decimal values as well. Yeah, I kinda forgot about all the resources. Its been awhile since I had to setup my encoding programs from scratch, yay for new hardware and Windows 7! By looking at the wiki are "V0", "--preset fast extreme", and "--preset extreme" all the same thing? "V0" and "--preset fast extreme" seem to be but "--preset extreme" doesn’t seem to be mentioned anywhere (which is what I"m using). Oh, and I'm using 3.98.4 x64. This post has been edited by Operandi: Jan 10 2011, 05:36 |
|
|
|
Jan 10 2011, 06:02
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 9265 Joined: 1-April 04 Member No.: 13167 |
With Lame 3.98(.x):
"--preset fast extreme" is "-V0" "--preset extreme" is "-V0 --vbr-old" This post has been edited by greynol: Jan 10 2011, 06:07 -------------------- Everything sounds the same until it is proven otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2011, 19:19
Post
#15
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 8-September 02 Member No.: 3324 |
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2011, 20:03
Post
#16
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderator Posts: 9265 Joined: 1-April 04 Member No.: 13167 |
That has been the consensus of this forum for a while now.
-------------------- Everything sounds the same until it is proven otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Jan 11 2011, 07:34
Post
#17
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 8-September 02 Member No.: 3324 |
Alright then, I believe I have it all sorted out.
Thanks for the help everyone. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 09:51 |