ALC889 RMAA results at 24/44.1 |
![]() ![]() |
ALC889 RMAA results at 24/44.1 |
Dec 30 2011, 11:23
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 22-December 03 From: Malmö, Sweden Member No.: 10615 |
Motherboard is a Gigabyte Z68XP-UD4.
Line out to line in: http://nerdmoments.byethost7.com/24_44_1.htm Output set at "50", input at "100", assumed to be nominal levels(?). Headphone out at max output, unloaded, to line in. (Input reduced to "25"): http://nerdmoments.byethost7.com/24_44_1_HP.htm I can do some loaded test of the headphone pre-amp if anyone's interested. I have Ety HF5, Beyer DT250-80, Senn PX-100, Koss KTXPro1, Senn HD201 and Creative EP-630 at hand. I assume I need a 3,5 mm Y splitter with one male and one female connector at the split ends? Note that while output is 24-bit capable input is 16-bit(oddly, both are 24-bit according to datasheet). This post has been edited by markanini: Dec 30 2011, 12:04 |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2011, 12:02
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 304 Joined: 29-April 11 From: Austria Member No.: 90198 |
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2011, 12:15
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 22-December 03 From: Malmö, Sweden Member No.: 10615 |
I assume I need a 3,5 mm Y splitter with one male and one female connector at the split ends? Or a normal Y splitter (2 female ends) and a loopback cable. I'd be interested how measurements change with ~30 ohm headphones as load. That would be the PX100(32Ohms). I'm picking up a splitter today. |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2011, 15:31
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 304 Joined: 29-April 11 From: Austria Member No.: 90198 |
Alright. The audio chip is a Realtek ALC889 right? (typo in the thread title)
|
|
|
|
Dec 30 2011, 17:10
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 22-December 03 From: Malmö, Sweden Member No.: 10615 |
Yes.
|
|
|
|
Dec 31 2011, 07:44
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 22-December 03 From: Malmö, Sweden Member No.: 10615 |
Results for PX100:
http://nerdmoments.byethost7.com/24_44_1_PX_100_66.htm http://nerdmoments.byethost7.com/24_44_1_PX_100_61.htm http://nerdmoments.byethost7.com/24_44_1_PX_100_43.htm http://nerdmoments.byethost7.com/24_44_1_PX_100_32.htm Would love to hear your comments, xnor. |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2011, 07:53
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4132 Joined: 2-September 02 Member No.: 3264 |
Those look really bad. I'm assuming thats the headphone out and not line out?
|
|
|
|
Dec 31 2011, 09:32
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 22-December 03 From: Malmö, Sweden Member No.: 10615 |
Some sort of best case result with Etymotic HF5: http://nerdmoments.byethost7.com/24_44_1_HF5.htm
I guess the conclusion one could draw is that the line-out is clean, no less clean than pro-audio interfaces I've used(!), but better to use a separate headphone amp if signal quality is a concern. |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2011, 11:01
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 9 Joined: 10-October 10 Member No.: 84494 |
Make sure you change in realtek software "speaker configuration" from speakers --> headphone.
Here is my RMAA measurements of ALC888. I did a loopback with a y-splitter cable and AKG K530 attached. The order is: ALC888 + AKG K530 + headphone option in realtek software "speaker configuration" ALC888 + AKG K530 ALC888 |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2011, 12:33
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 22-December 03 From: Malmö, Sweden Member No.: 10615 |
For the sake of comparison split loopback driving Etymotic HF5 through a dedicated heaphone amp built by a guy named Knut: http://nerdmoments.byethost7.com/ALC889+headphone%20amp.htm
This post has been edited by markanini: Dec 31 2011, 12:34 |
|
|
|
Jan 1 2012, 06:03
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 22-December 03 From: Malmö, Sweden Member No.: 10615 |
Again for comparison, Sansa Fuze. Totally beats previous results for frequency responce THD and IMD:
http://nerdmoments.byethost7.com/Fuze -6dB.htm (Driving Etymotic HF5) I think with something like a Fiio E5+ALC889 should be able to produce very high quality sound to headphones. One certainly doesn't need to spend big $$$. This post has been edited by markanini: Jan 1 2012, 06:10 |
|
|
|
Jan 1 2012, 12:01
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 304 Joined: 29-April 11 From: Austria Member No.: 90198 |
Indeed, the problems seem to be output impedance (-> deviations from flat FR depending on impedance curve of the headphones) and IMD + noise when driving a load. As a source it should work pretty well.
|
|
|
|
Jan 1 2012, 16:02
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 22-December 03 From: Malmö, Sweden Member No.: 10615 |
Yeah, high output impedance.
For fun here's the most ambitious looking on-board I've seen:
|
|
|
|
Jan 1 2012, 16:47
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 22-December 03 From: Malmö, Sweden Member No.: 10615 |
I googled and couldnt find a straight answer to this one: Is there an easy and accurate way to measure output impedance on and headphone output with a multimeter? Depending on where I place the prods at the TRS I get 8, 16, and 32 Ohm on my dedicated amp.
This post has been edited by markanini: Jan 1 2012, 16:47 |
|
|
|
Jan 1 2012, 19:34
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 304 Joined: 29-April 11 From: Austria Member No.: 90198 |
Hmm, from 1.5 kHz to 70 Hz there's a difference of about 4 dB with the PX100 (impedance ranges from about 34 to 60 ohm) so the output impedance seems to be a lot higher. Could be as high as 100 to 200 ohms?
I think you could play some 50-60 Hz sine wave (e.g. use Audacity to generate them) and measure ac voltage without and with load (e.g. 30 ohm resistor). Then calculate Zout = (Rload * (Vnoload - Vload)) / Vload. Not the most accurate way however. This post has been edited by xnor: Jan 2 2012, 13:33 |
|
|
|
Jan 2 2012, 18:03
Post
#16
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4132 Joined: 2-September 02 Member No.: 3264 |
I googled and couldnt find a straight answer to this one: Is there an easy and accurate way to measure output impedance on and headphone output with a multimeter? Depending on where I place the prods at the TRS I get 8, 16, and 32 Ohm on my dedicated amp. You have to measure the voltage with 2 known resistances and then solve for the output impedance. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Source_a...d_circuit_Z.png You would control ZL, measure VL, and then solve for ZS. |
|
|
|
Mar 15 2013, 09:52
Post
#17
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 9 Joined: 10-October 10 Member No.: 84494 |
I forgot about this topic.
Yeah, high output impedance. According to the spec sheet the amplified output impedance for ALC889 is 2Ohms. Line out is 200Ohms. |
|
|
|
Mar 15 2013, 10:06
Post
#18
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1062 Joined: 4-May 04 From: France Member No.: 13875 |
The output impedance isn't just tied to the DAC chip, it will depend on the implementation on your PC / laptop.
An easier way to measure output impedance is to play and record a sine wave at 1 kHz, without a load, and with a load of known impedance (like headphones with a stereo splitter). Determine the RMS value of both recordings (e.g. with "sox file.wav -n stat -rms"), then use the following formula: Zout = (Zhp * (RMShigh - RMSlow)) / RMSlow You can adjust that value by taking into account your ADC's input impedance, if you know it: Zout = 1 / ((1 / Zout) - (1 / Zin)) I've managed to make reliable measurements that way (verified by comparing my results to other results available online). Don't ask me about the math, I got it from stv014, but I know it works. -------------------- Save my friend from going homeless: http://outpost.fr/url/308w
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2013, 18:22
Post
#19
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 26-February 13 Member No.: 106902 |
According to the spec sheet the amplified output impedance for ALC889 is 2Ohms. Line out is 200Ohms. The datasheet also recommends (in the "Application Circuits" section) 75 Ω serial resistors (and also 100 uF capacitors) on the headphone output, so an implementation that follows the reference design would have an output impedance of 77 Ω. |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2013, 19:45
Post
#20
|
|
![]() Group: Developer Posts: 304 Joined: 29-April 11 From: Austria Member No.: 90198 |
Z77 Extreme 4 motherboard - I measured about 80 ohms for the front panel headphone output and 200 ohms for the line out in the back.
Some semi-pro/home recording audio interfaces have similar output impedance for the headphone out, or lower (down to about 20 ohms). This post has been edited by xnor: Mar 25 2013, 19:49 |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2013, 20:02
Post
#21
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 3212 Joined: 29-October 08 From: USA, 48236 Member No.: 61311 |
Motherboard is a Gigabyte Z68XP-UD4. Line out to line in: http://nerdmoments.byethost7.com/24_44_1.htm Output set at "50", input at "100", assumed to be nominal levels(?). In other measurements I've found that a lot of chips used for on board audio interfaces have asymmetrical performance. IOW their ADCs aren't up to the quality levels of their DACs. I recently did some testing of an ALC 887 chip on a Gigabyte system board and when looping it back through itself, found results similar to those posted above. I then redid the tests looping the ALC 887 output through an M-Audio AP 24192 input - knowing that this interface has native performance with up to 110 dB dynamic range. I obtained the following results: Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB: +0.01, -0.08 Excellent Noise level, dB (A): -92.4 Very good Dynamic range, dB (A): 92.4 Very good THD, %: 0.0028 Excellent IMD + Noise, %: 0.030 Good Stereo crosstalk, dB: -89.8 Excellent IMD at 10 kHz, %: 0.0093 Very good While I'm at it, I discovered a way to circumvent a problem that sometimes arises while testing different audio interfaces mixed and matched. In this test I was never able to get a recording level of greater than -12 dB, which the Rightmark program had problems with. I simply had the Rightmark program save the wave file that it recorded, normalized it with Audacity, and then analyzed it. Since the noise level of the AP 24192 card is about 110 db below its normal FS input, the test was run under a condition where this was effectively 98 dB below the tests, and so errors due to the circumvention were still well below the dynnamic range that was observed. This post has been edited by Arnold B. Krueger: Mar 25 2013, 20:13 |
|
|
|
Mar 25 2013, 22:19
Post
#22
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 22-December 03 From: Malmö, Sweden Member No.: 10615 |
Try setting the main output to headphone mode. I remember gettting more volume and better rightmark results in loopbaack mode that way.
This post has been edited by db1989: Mar 27 2013, 14:54
Reason for edit: deleting pointless full quote of above post
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2013, 14:52
Post
#23
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 3212 Joined: 29-October 08 From: USA, 48236 Member No.: 61311 |
Tried setting output to headphones instead of speakers and obtained:
Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB: +0.01, -0.07 Excellent Noise level, dB (A): -92.5 Very good Dynamic range, dB (A): 92.6 Very good THD, %: 0.0028 Excellent IMD + Noise, %: 0.029 Good Stereo crosstalk, dB: -90.1 Excellent IMD at 10 kHz, %: 0.0092 Very good This post has been edited by db1989: Mar 27 2013, 14:55
Reason for edit: deleting pointless full quote of post containing pointless full quote
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2013, 14:58
Post
#24
|
|
|
Group: Super Moderator Posts: 4345 Joined: 23-June 06 Member No.: 32180 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2013, 16:52
Post
#25
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 26-February 13 Member No.: 106902 |
ALC887 line output (rear jack) on an ASUS motherboard. The front panel is not connected, because it is used by a sound card, so I cannot test the headphone output, but I measured it earlier to have an output impedance of slightly more than 75 Ω.
Output impedance Output impedance phase The output impedance of ~200 Ω is consistent with the datasheet. There are apparently also 10 uF capacitors on the output (calculated from the output impedance and the frequency at which the phase is -45 degrees). THD vs. level at 3 kHz unloaded and with 220 Ω load With the low impedance load, the line output clips at high level. This probably would not happen on the headphone output. This post has been edited by stv014: Mar 27 2013, 17:02 |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 16:22 |