IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Final Settings Prior To Encoding Collection, [moved from CD Hardware/Software]
essentialjpm
post Jul 12 2013, 20:09
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 12-July 13
Member No.: 109083



I have an old account but I haven't posted in a long time, can't remember the email I registered with so I started this account. Anyway, I've ripped my CD collection several times (once at 128kbps, then again at 192kbps, then again at v0) each time with Easy CD-DA Extractor. Didn't always rip all at once, but the settings were pretty much the same till I changed so many CDs could have been ripped with different LAME versions as well.

Anyway, I'm sticking with v0 and I'm ready to re-do the entire collection at the same time with the same LAME version and settings. I don't want to be kicking myself again in a few years so I wouldn't mind a few opinions before I do everything and realize I did something incorrectly again in a few years.

After reading this forum a lot, the Exact Audio Copy wiki, and general Google searches, this is my final:

Software: Exact Audio Copy (0.99 Prebeta 4)

LAME: 3.98.4-vc6

Command Line: -V 0 --id3v2-only --ta "%a" --tl "%g" --tn "%n" --tt "%t" --ty "%y" --tg "%m" --tc "rbm (eac secure mode)" %s %d

I'm looking for the highest quality v0, rip time doesn't matter. From my reading this is the best command line I can get, am I missing anything?

Also, it seems like LAME 3.98.4 is highly recommended, is there a different version I should be using?

Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
spoon
post Sep 12 2013, 14:49
Post #2


dBpowerAMP developer


Group: Developer (Donating)
Posts: 2723
Joined: 24-March 02
Member No.: 1615



We let people decide on their own, I keep an open mind. A segment of the market had a need for an uncompressed lossless codec without tagging limitations, we gave people what they were asking for.

Here is a typical reply we give about its virtues:

http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php...ll=1#post136096

QUOTE
Some people are sure they can hear a difference, others are sure they cannot. Lossless is lossless, that is all the modes decode to the exact same audio, however the difference is the amount of CPU time required for each, depending on player (such as modern PC) it could be very little cpu for both, or more significant for embedded players.




--------------------
Spoon http://www.dbpoweramp.com
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
db1989
post Sep 12 2013, 16:11
Post #3





Group: Super Moderator
Posts: 5141
Joined: 23-June 06
Member No.: 32180



QUOTE (spoon @ Sep 12 2013, 14:49) *
Here is a typical reply we give about its virtues:

http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php...ll=1#post136096

QUOTE
Some people are sure they can hear a difference, others are sure they cannot. Lossless is lossless, that is all the modes decode to the exact same audio, however the difference is the amount of CPU time required for each, depending on player (such as modern PC) it could be very little cpu for both, or more significant for embedded players.

Some people think lots of things. A lot of them are wrong. I feel you give too much credence to the idea that anyone can hear a difference with losslessly compressed audio decoded by a computer thatís not hopelessly broken. Your choice of phrasing, perhaps unintentionally, is nonetheless open to people reading it to mean that CPU time consumed might induce differences in quality, something thatís false for all such computers. But maybe you donít want to state anything so conclusive about quality and thus alienate the particular proportion of your paying userbase who believe such myths.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- essentialjpm   Final Settings Prior To Encoding Collection   Jul 12 2013, 20:09
- - db1989   QUOTE (essentialjpm @ Jul 12 2013, 20:09)...   Jul 12 2013, 20:16
|- - essentialjpm   QUOTE (db1989 @ Jul 12 2013, 15:16) QUOTE...   Jul 12 2013, 21:18
|- - themanintheshadows_2451   QUOTE (db1989 @ Jul 12 2013, 21:16) QUOTE...   Sep 14 2013, 05:28
|- - Mach-X   QUOTE (themanintheshadows_2451 @ Sep 14 2013,...   Sep 14 2013, 05:35
- - Apesbrain   You're ripping your CD collection for the 4th ...   Jul 12 2013, 23:14
- - Eli   I would echo the recommendation for FLAC. Its loss...   Jul 13 2013, 00:23
- - slks   Rip to FLAC first, then encode with any version of...   Jul 13 2013, 10:54
- - Aleron Ives   LAME 3.100k is the current version of halb27's...   Jul 13 2013, 21:29
- - db1989   QUOTE (Aleron Ives @ Jul 13 2013, 21:29) ...   Jul 14 2013, 11:02
- - essentialjpm   After several recommending it in this topic, I bou...   Sep 12 2013, 02:36
|- - eahm   Why why why are you converting to MP3 if you have ...   Sep 12 2013, 02:43
|- - db1989   QUOTE (essentialjpm @ Sep 12 2013, 02:36)...   Sep 12 2013, 02:43
|- - rick.hughes   QUOTE (essentialjpm @ Sep 11 2013, 20:36)...   Sep 12 2013, 15:03
- - tpijag   2. Lossless is lossless so what level of compressi...   Sep 12 2013, 02:44
- - essentialjpm   QUOTE (db1989 @ Sep 11 2013, 21:43) No, n...   Sep 12 2013, 03:03
|- - gib   QUOTE (essentialjpm @ Sep 11 2013, 16:03)...   Sep 12 2013, 06:07
- - eahm   FLAC -0 in uncompressed. Again, why won't you ...   Sep 12 2013, 03:06
|- - greynol   QUOTE (eahm @ Sep 11 2013, 19:06) FLAC -0...   Sep 12 2013, 06:33
- - eahm   Wow, I totally confused level 0 with uncompressed ...   Sep 12 2013, 06:51
- - Mach-X   There is no such thing as 'uncompressed' f...   Sep 12 2013, 07:12
|- - marc2003   QUOTE (Mach-X @ Sep 12 2013, 07:12) ...   Sep 12 2013, 08:07
- - eahm   Mach-X, thanks for the lesson about lossless compr...   Sep 12 2013, 07:24
- - Mach-X   Any idea what commandline switch that is? Never he...   Sep 12 2013, 07:45
|- - JJZolx   --disable-constant-subframes --disable-fixed-subfr...   Sep 12 2013, 08:04
- - db1989   Uncompressed FLAC is a dubious extension pioneered...   Sep 12 2013, 13:13
- - spoon   We let people decide on their own, I keep an open ...   Sep 12 2013, 14:49
|- - db1989   QUOTE (spoon @ Sep 12 2013, 14:49) Here i...   Sep 12 2013, 16:11
- - spoon   There is also the [multi-encoder] encoder which al...   Sep 12 2013, 15:11
- - Wombat   This is business. In that case it is good service ...   Sep 12 2013, 16:31
- - spoon   I not talk about normal computers, rather networke...   Sep 12 2013, 16:38
- - essentialjpm   QUOTE (eahm @ Sep 11 2013, 22:06) FLAC -0...   Sep 12 2013, 18:22
|- - eahm   Please read here http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/foru...   Sep 12 2013, 19:22
- - greynol   Please don't confuse uncompressed with lossles...   Sep 12 2013, 18:31
- - JJZolx   I also keep both FLAC and MP3 copies of everything...   Sep 12 2013, 18:55
- - greynol   ...or a lossy library in a different format (vorbi...   Sep 12 2013, 18:59
- - phofman   For those using linux e.g. on their NAS - the grea...   Sep 12 2013, 20:39
- - Mach-X   I support the mp3 choice as well because if you de...   Sep 13 2013, 00:13
- - Alexey Lukin   RE: Final Settings Prior To Encoding Collection   Sep 13 2013, 21:58
- - Wombat   WoW! 64bit! I hope you didn't got m...   Sep 13 2013, 22:10
- - Mach-X   Correction for my "no such thing as uncompres...   Sep 14 2013, 04:43
- - JJZolx   There may be more than just the following thread. ...   Sep 14 2013, 08:40
- - greynol   FWIW, I chose not to upgrade to 3.99.5 because 3.9...   Sep 14 2013, 15:46
- - essentialjpm   I've been happy with dbpoweramp, (v0 and FLAC ...   Sep 20 2013, 21:28
- - spoon   If you install dBpoweramp R14.2 (archive.org looki...   Sep 20 2013, 21:36
- - essentialjpm   QUOTE (spoon @ Sep 20 2013, 16:36) If you...   Sep 21 2013, 02:29


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2014 - 04:32