Lame and surround |
Lame and surround |
Aug 6 2003, 12:45
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 30-June 03 From: Venice (yeah, city of the gondola!!) Member No.: 7470 |
Hi guys. I've read many past threads about Lame and encoding movies soundtracks from AC3 to Dolby Surround1/2. While many people claim that Lame preserves the phase informations thanks to its safe joint stereo mode, in this thread http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....t=0entry47454 it's stated that only at very high bitrates (for e.g. --alt-preset extreme or insane(!!)) Lame can conserve surround infos in a decent way.
Anyway i've encoded lots of movie soundtracks with Lame, and the --alt-preset standard setting seems quite good to me for surround1/2 tracks. Thanks for any answer! Fr4nz |
|
|
|
![]() |
Aug 7 2003, 11:19
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 30-June 03 From: Venice (yeah, city of the gondola!!) Member No.: 7470 |
QUOTE (TrNSZ @ Aug 6 2003, 08:56 AM) II guess an interesting test would be to listen to the output of the surround from aps and aps nssafejoint. If this can be ABX'd, then I think it would be smart to ABX alt-preset extreme vs. alt-preset standard + nssafejoint. The bitrates will probably be very similar; the real test is to increase the quality of the "surround" channel without degrading the rest of the signal below the level of audible transparency. Maybe someone else can define a better test methodology -- I've been up for two days now and might not be thinking straight. =) I encoded an AC3 sample from matrix with --aps --nsmsfix 1.0 and --ape --aps --nsmsfix 1.0 gave me ~198kbps --ape gave me 242kbps!!! So there's a great difference in terms of kbits between these 2 modes. It would be nice to have a preset optimized for surround tracks like 2BDecided suggests |
|
|
|
Fr4nz Lame and surround Aug 6 2003, 12:45
sld Pardon me, but did you ask a question? Aug 6 2003, 13:17
Fr4nz Yes, sorry for my english
The question would be... Aug 6 2003, 13:21
TrNSZ What do you mean by Dolby Surround? If you are sp... Aug 6 2003, 14:20
Fr4nz QUOTE (TrNSZ @ Aug 6 2003, 05:20 AM)What do y... Aug 6 2003, 14:32
smok3 i remember the thread on HA where someone was test... Aug 6 2003, 14:37
2Bdecided I've always wondered about these two threads:
... Aug 6 2003, 14:43
Fr4nz Lol you're post is a little fucked up but I un... Aug 6 2003, 15:00
Lev QUOTE EDIT: sorry this is so long - there have bee... Aug 6 2003, 15:10
Gabriel David, your post would probably be more understand... Aug 6 2003, 15:23
CiTay QUOTE (Gabriel @ Aug 6 2003, 04:23 PM)David, ... Aug 6 2003, 15:37
TrNSZ Yeah, it's the board formatting causing the er... Aug 6 2003, 16:02
2Bdecided QUOTE (TrNSZ @ Aug 6 2003, 03:02 PM)Yeah, it... Aug 6 2003, 17:08
Fr4nz If I remember well --alt-presets uses nssafejoint ... Aug 6 2003, 17:51
TrNSZ I recall having a similar discussion on the r3mix ... Aug 6 2003, 17:56
kxy QUOTE (Fr4nz @ Aug 6 2003, 08:00 AM)Lol you... Aug 6 2003, 18:41
Fr4nz QUOTE (kxy @ Aug 6 2003, 09:41 AM)QUOTE (Fr4n... Aug 6 2003, 18:54
Fr4nz So guys --nsmsfix 1.0 is the way to go for encodin... Aug 7 2003, 09:05
2Bdecided QUOTE (Fr4nz @ Aug 7 2003, 08:05 AM)So guys -... Aug 7 2003, 10:42
2Bdecided I've had an email from Frank. He asked 6 sensi... Aug 8 2003, 13:33
Fr4nz David you're totally right. If I put my ears n... Aug 8 2003, 13:45
Fr4nz David are you alive?? I'm waiting for a PM rep... Aug 10 2003, 11:04![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th June 2013 - 05:33 |